Joined September 2017
287 Photos and videos
Dr. Jeremy Levine, PhD of city council meetings retweeted
State housing laws are unlocking housing in places that long blocked them: Beverly Hills, Palo Alto, and even Marin County. @JeremyELevine argues state and local tools work best together, not as rivals.
1
5
39
1,369
16-story project proposed in Woodside, CA—median home value $5 million. Would be first multi-family in Woodside history Most amazing about this proposal: City staff kept it a secret for more than TWO YEARS since 2024. Just did not tell anyone, including their own council
19
22
160
20,147
Reporting courtesy @angelaswartz I’m not sure this project is buildable or even desirable. Alas, this is the natural consequence when cities fail to plan for housing on their own. sfgate.com/local/article/bay…
4
15
2,697
Dr. Jeremy Levine, PhD of city council meetings retweeted
NIMBY lawyers are trying to end around the AB130 CEQA exemption by arguing that the Subdivision Map Act permits disapproval if the infill project creates environmental impacts. This = a higher hurdle for for-sale than rental projects. Pointless obstacle. Need a legislative fix
4
5
37
4,340
The City of San Mateo is considering designating a historic gas station The “historic” property in question below. Things like this delegitimize the entire historic preservation process
9
12
246
64,293
“We don’t need protected bike lanes, nobody bikes here anyway!” The existing bike lanes:
5
2
59
1,060
NIMBYs have been using this 18-story 260-home proposal in downtown Santa Cruz as scare tactics about new state housing laws and I honestly hope they continue to do so because it is extremely based
25
24
492
103,644
The hero LA needs
Let’s lower the rent! As mayor, I will triple housing production by cutting red tape, lowering costs, and eliminating pointless bureaucracy.
4
195
Dr. Jeremy Levine, PhD of city council meetings retweeted
Let’s lower the rent! As mayor, I will triple housing production by cutting red tape, lowering costs, and eliminating pointless bureaucracy.
452
180
1,464
387,201
Not to brag but up here in the Bay Area, San Mateo charged $20k per apartment in parks fees; Palo Alto charges avg $40k; RWC $43k; Sunnyvale $70k PER APARTMENT LA can only dream of loving parks like we do
LA charges park fees between 8 and 18 grand for each new unit of housing built. I guess now we know where it’s going. If you live in LA go enjoy those restrooms, because they’re built into your rent.
2
3
1,590
I do it all for the haters, shout out Carl Cole 🫡 jeremyl.substack.com/p/nimby…
132
1899 New York Times take on the “automobile” holds up well
69
Spicy title for a mild take: Recalls and ballot measures are often used by very wealthy people with a ton of free time to subvert decisions by legitimately elected officials and block housing Representative democracy is better! open.substack.com/pub/jeremy…
2
141
In crazy political times, good things are still happening in local governments across America! As we head into 2026, I’m excited about all the communities that are ending single-family zoning once and for all. Cambridge leading the way! open.substack.com/pub/jeremy…
2
80
I want to make it easier to build childcare for families who need it Other people can’t stand the sound of children playing Enjoy some of their hate mail! jeremyl.substack.com/p/nimby…
74
”Inclusionary Zoning” doesn’t actually make zoning inclusionary. In fact, it’s not zoning at all! Though it’s very smart branding jeremyl.substack.com/p/inclu…
1
125
A recent working paper estimates federal “planning assistance caused municipalities to build 20% fewer housing units per decade over the 50 years that followed” from the 1960s Shocking if remotely true that adding planners directly causes lower housing production
1
1
68
Amazing that this suggests “community benefits” to reduce opposition to housing have no impact at all. Maybe bribing people to support housing actually doesn’t work?
Replying to @zoningwonk
(We found basically the same effect if we told them the tall building would provide half a million in community benefits for a park.)
166