Joined May 2021
1,717 Photos and videos
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
“Seeing a beautiful young woman gives pleasure to anyone. But seeing a mature woman of 27-28 years, with one child in her lap and a healthy 5 year old child walking while holding her finger, gives me greater pleasure. I would consider that woman more fortunate.” ~ Veer Savarkar
Which way Hindu man?
6
93
944
24,298
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
"Not a matter of religion, but your stomach. What is best for your body should be the determinant and not tradition." These words are not of Savarkar but taken from Arun Shorie's book and are Arun Shorie's words. Try harder next time and bring primary sources.
Savarkar's views on Beef eating. *Not a matter of religion, but your stomach. What is best for your body should be the determinant and not tradition. *Life of all - cows, dogs, horses, parrots, donkeys - is equally precious. *Cows and Bulls of our country may be precious, but no harm in eating those of other countries like in the west. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was one such beef eater who ate Beef provided it was not *Indian Cow*. Gandhi otoh was very clear that the Cow is worthy of veneration. Which side are you on? Gandhi or Savarkar?
4
41
249
5,461
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
Savarkar: I believe that cow should be protected. Do armed struggle against cow slaughter. Inside the slaughterhouse a cow does not bleed but every Hindu's heart bleeds. Gandhi: How can I force anyone not to slaughter cows. No law can be made against it. Which side are you on?
Savarkar's views on Beef eating. *Not a matter of religion, but your stomach. What is best for your body should be the determinant and not tradition. *Life of all - cows, dogs, horses, parrots, donkeys - is equally precious. *Cows and Bulls of our country may be precious, but no harm in eating those of other countries like in the west. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was one such beef eater who ate Beef provided it was not *Indian Cow*. Gandhi otoh was very clear that the Cow is worthy of veneration. Which side are you on? Gandhi or Savarkar?
3
36
119
2,399
Imagine saying two lies with such confidence. Neither was he childless, nor homosexual.
Savarkar saying this while being a childless homosexual is a bit ironic
21
255
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
Post WW1, Only British Jinnah Savarkar Has clarity about future Hence both Jinnah & Savarkar changed tracks from “Independence “ to post Independence power equations Unfortunately, Jinnah got M support Hs didn’t rally behind Savarkar as much & rest as they say is history
2
21
140
2,457
"Not a matter of religion, but your stomach. What is best for your body should be the determinant and not tradition." These words are not of Savarkar but taken from Arun Shorie's book and are Arun Shorie's words. Try harder next time and bring primary sources.
Savarkar's views on Beef eating. *Not a matter of religion, but your stomach. What is best for your body should be the determinant and not tradition. *Life of all - cows, dogs, horses, parrots, donkeys - is equally precious. *Cows and Bulls of our country may be precious, but no harm in eating those of other countries like in the west. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was one such beef eater who ate Beef provided it was not *Indian Cow*. Gandhi otoh was very clear that the Cow is worthy of veneration. Which side are you on? Gandhi or Savarkar?
4
41
249
5,461
Further comparison of Savarkar and Gandhi's views.
Savarkar: I believe that cow should be protected. Do armed struggle against cow slaughter. Inside the slaughterhouse a cow does not bleed but every Hindu's heart bleeds. Gandhi: How can I force anyone not to slaughter cows. No law can be made against it. Which side are you on?
1
19
501
I am yet to understand how the guy was wrong according to feminist morality. Feminists ran the entire movement to normalise casual sex and one night stands. According to feminist morality, where consent = morality how is the guy wrong? He had the consent of the girl.
"A far worse joke than him" This world class chuttad @venom1s thinks mocking dead is worse than sexually assaulting woman. No wonder these incels are have negative braincells
3
18
459
Top 4 gems of @ThePrintIndia according to me. Which one is your favourite?
The Print is publishing anything. Not like it had been any better earlier but this is low for even its own standards. In the name of casteist attacks it quotes three tweets which criticise reservation and Sejal getting admission at 406 marks. And the article is over. That's it🤣
1
3
15
352
No it wouldn't have solved anything as spending Zakat on other than Islamic causes is not allowed. The only way to spend it on non-Muslims is if you are trying to convert them. Don't try to portray a 7th century desert cult as an egalitarian solution.
If he was a muslim 2.5% Zakat from him would had been solved world hunger crisis
10
166
The Print is publishing anything. Not like it had been any better earlier but this is low for even its own standards. In the name of casteist attacks it quotes three tweets which criticise reservation and Sejal getting admission at 406 marks. And the article is over. That's it🤣
Tribal MBBS student Sejal Pawar is facing casteist attack over ‘male corpse’ remark Manisha Mondal @manishamondal25 reports #ThePrintFeature theprint.in/feature/tribal-m…
1
6
36
1,245
The amount of performative bakchodi these DINKtards do is irritating. Every other reel they are dancing on a beach as if that is the ultimate objective of life.
DINK(Double income No Kids) couples ka aadha life doosre ko ye dikhaane me jaata hai ki they are happy and doing good without kids ,while being jealous of people who are actually happy
4
7
163
3,626
Mine was 3 idiots if I remember correctly.
My first movie in the theatre was Partner( banger). What was yours??
1
139
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
No & she shouldn't. If she did, societal stigma & shame should make her uncomfortable to the core that she has to leave the country in order to be degenerate pile of sh!t.
Can an average girl wear something like this in Indian streets? When will we get real freedom?
2
6
84
2,191
Savarkar's criticism of Marxist philosophy that sees everything as a class struggle and believes every problem can be solved through an economic program.
2
4
33
577
Definition of Hindu as a believer of Shruti-Smriti has some problems to it I feel which I will try to explain using a very dumb example. Counters on this one are really appreciated. Let's suppose I say I am a firm believer of Vedas, Shruti, Smriti and scriptures but I also
श्रुतिस्मृत्यादिशास्त्रेषु प्रामाण्यबुद्धिमवलम्ब्य श्रुत्यादिप्रोक्ते धर्मे विश्वासं निष्ठां च यः करोति स एव वास्तव हिन्दुपदवाच्यः। - स्वामी श्रीहरिहरानन्दसरस्वती 'करपात्रीजी' A Hindu, according to Karpatri Ji, the Gurudev of Puri Shankaracharya Ji, is someone who accepts the authority of the Vedic scriptures (Shruti and Smriti) as valid knowledge (pramāṇa) and has firm faith and commitment in the Dharma taught by them. Since nāstikas do not accept Shruti and Smriti as valid authority, can they fall under this definition of Hindu as given in that statement? There are, however, many definitions of Hindu. What Puri Shankaracharya Ji said is in the context of Civilizational Unity. Period.
2
3
11
494
Believe that the Purusha in Purusha Sukta is Batman. Will I qualify as a Hindu? I believe you will answer as no. But why? I am believing in Vedas and all scriptures. But I am wrong because my interpretation is not correct. I have to not only believe in Scriptures but also
1
1
7
234
Interpret them correctly to be a Hindu according to your definition. Now when interpretation comes into play then Shaivas will believe the Vaishnava interpretation is wrong and vice versa. Both will not be able to consider each other Hindu. I have summarised my argument also
2
2
10
222