Our latest piece of research is out! š
We found that -hectare for hectare- solar farms managed with nature in mind can support a greater number of bird species & individuals than surrounding intensively managed arable land š¦
@RSPBScience @CLR_Cambridge
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.ā¦
1/6 #BOUasm24#SESH3 | Modelling the impact of onshore renewable expansion on nature, food, and carbon
We assess the area of land needed for onshore renewable energy generation and explore co-benefits and trade-offs. Full details in our latest paper:
cell.com/cell-reports-sustaiā¦
5/6 #BOUasm24#SESH3 | Results
Onshore wind and solar had a small impact on bird habitat availability at the national scale because the footprint of infrastructure is small and the increases in habitat availability from NbS far outweigh the impact from renewable energy deployment
ALT Plots showing impacts of renewables on four bird groups. NbS has greatest impact with renewables accounting for around 1.8% lower habitat availability compared to scenarios without new renewables
6/6 #BOUasm24#SESH3 | Conclusions
⢠Ambitious renewable deployment uses only a small fraction of land
⢠Little cost to food production, GHG sequestration & most terrestrial birds
⢠We could deploy more renewables without substantially contributing to future land challenges
ALT Image of wind turbines and solar panels at sunset. Source: greensync.com
There has been a rapid expansion in growing crops to produce biomethane as cleaner alternative to fossil fuels to help reach #NetZero
But cultivating maize on drained peat emits 3x more #CO2 than it avoids by not using natural #gas says new @UK_CEH study:
ceh.ac.uk/press/growing-key-ā¦
ICYMI, we mapped opportunities for onshore renewables across the UK, and found that there's easily enough space to meet net zero energy targets without compromising other objectives from land: cell.com/cell-reports-sustai⦠Eagerly awaiting the government's Strategic Spatial Energy Plan
Great to Josh's hard work pay off with a publication. We reckon there is ample space for onshore renewables to be deployed without meaningfully impact food or nature. So, no excuse for development in silly places. As with all land-use decisions, we need to be strategic.
Iām pleased to share our newest paper: āAmbitious onshore renewable energy deployment does not exacerbate future UK land-use challengesā. cell.com/cell-reports-sustai⦠1/8
Iām pleased to share our newest paper: āAmbitious onshore renewable energy deployment does not exacerbate future UK land-use challengesā. cell.com/cell-reports-sustai⦠1/8
So, what does this mean? The relatively small percentage of land required for renewables means we can steer the deployment of onshore renewables towards lower-grade agricultural land and away from sensitive wildlife areas and national parks. 7/8
In doing so, nature can be given suitable space to play a crucial role in our overall efforts to tackle climate change, underpin our food security through nature-friendly farming, and reach net zero emissions by 2050. 8/8