TTHE HOAX OF PURGATORY! THE HOAX OF PURGATORY! THE BLOOD OF JESUS HAS 2 FUNCTION: 1. as cleansing agent of mortal sins 2. as purchase money for jesus to buy the church from god im not qualified to be cleansed by blood bec i have never sinned any mortal sin, all i have were sins by ignorance which is not a valid sin. so im happy to say, THE BLOOD OF JESUS NEVER CLEANSED ME BEC I WAS CLEAN. lets read: 1 John 1:7-8 [7]But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. [8]If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. THINGS TO CONSIDER> 1. blood cleanse us from all sin 2. we have sins NOTE. BOTH IN PRESENT TENSE meaning, while blood cleanse our mortal sins we retain our venial sins therefore, blood is for mortal sins only, we still have venial sins. i have never any mortal sins thus im not relative to sin offering or blood offering, never a recipient nor not in a single instance, did blood cleansed me bec im already clean, just some venial sins which of course in the sight of god is not a valid sin as he sees us as inoccent people. lets read: Romans 3:24 [24]Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: JUSTIFIED in greek: Greek: δικαιόω Transliteration: dikaioō Pronunciation: dik-ah-yo'-o Definition: From G1342; to render (that is show or regard as) just or innocent: - free justify (-ier) be righteous. THEREFORE, WE ARE INNOCENT, THOUGH WE HAVE VENIAL SINS< ITS NOT A VALID SIN AS WE ARE INNOCENT OR PURE. MEANING, GOD DONT SEE US AS SINNERS BUT CLEAN SHEEP. so why must an innocent person goes to purgatory? just saying.

Thanks and God bless... I am endorsing this Book for every religious-minded people to analyze it with logical approach and see how it fosters the reality of divinity wherein YHWH is the true god and ALLAH is Satan. I laid-out the scientific and prophetic and numerical miracles of both Bible and Quran as comparative to how it is and to who is the real source: YHWH and not ALLAH. Have an in-depth understanding through its pages, where truth is exalted after the manner of logic and context beyond mere scripture, we look into science and history too as confirmatory to its nature, as supernatural miracles all in all abound to be discovered by merits of inspiration, we learn YHWH is a polytheist and Allah a monotheist therefore they cannot be the same God. READ 0R DOWNLOAD FREE IN THIS LINK BELOW:ALLAH IS SATAN! scribd.com/document/77570020… Views2:09 PM · May 14, 2026·20

IS JESUS GOD? i can use just a single verse and its sufficient enough to destroy the illusion of an absolute one god. its HEB 1:8-13 that says: "unto the son he saith, THY throne the god is forever and ever...THOU loved righteousness and hated iniquity...GOD, THY god hath anointed THEE...THOU o lord hath laid the foundation of the world and THINE hands made the heavens..." note on the capitalized words THY, THOU, THEE, THINE all referring to the son thus it follows, he is the creator of the universe as per aspect of grammar: "THOU o lord hath laid the foundation of the world and THINE hands made the heavens..." that kind of presupposition is conclusive to say the son of god created the universe that it follows, he is a divine god, even reiterated in JOHN 1:1 that says: "THE WORD WAS GOD..." that cannot be neglected thus any verse in the bible that says, there is only one god, then you must ask yourselves, is it a conclusion bec if it is, then it contradicts HEB 1:8-13 that says, the son is the creator of the universe. and if you read ISAIAH 44:24 that says, god the father is the only creator then ask yourselves, is it a conclusion? bec if it is, then it contradicts HEB 1:8-13 that says, the son is the creator of the universe. but if in any case you cannot find an answer and insist on cherrypicking and persist to say, there is an absolute one creator and an absolute one god, then you contradicts HEB 1:8-13 thus as preliminary, we know your faith is in error and even as ultimate, we know your faith is in error. why? you are contradicting the bible itself. now, tell us, how could you be the true church? #ProudMCGI

REPOSTING: @VividProwess No, Itamar Ben-Gvir didn't "ruin" Israel's reputation. Hamas literally filmed themselves with GoPros slaughtering Jews on October 7, and still many people around the world blame Israel for this war and take the terrorists' side. You can't convince low-moral people to be moral.

TO: CONG. CHUNGALAO Sir, i would like to suggest something as i see fit as a moralist and Christian, a proposition if given a chance to be heard. Will you propose a bill cancelling all pornography sites in the Philippine internet as we know the implication of android phones free use and even, internet is open even for elementary kids. I admit of sometimes watching pornhub as a defective, imperfect christian but even my grade school nephew has chances of having a casual peek, and that age is too premature on things like this. I am worried on the harsh reality of cause and effect and such sexual stimulus is quite not propriety to be even at the helm of kids. HELP US. Truly Yours, Denn

Was there a local court confirming the warrant of arrest for Bato dela Rosa? No, there has not been any local court (such as a Regional Trial Court or the Supreme Court) that has issued or confirmed a separate warrant of arrest for Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa in relation to the ICC case. Current Status (as of mid-May 2026) The International Criminal Court (ICC) unsealed and confirmed its arrest warrant against dela Rosa on May 11, 2026 (originally issued under seal on November 6, 2025). It charges him with crimes against humanity (murder) as an indirect co-perpetrator during the drug war period (2016–2018). Philippine authorities (NBI) attempted to serve the ICC warrant directly at the Senate on May 11, but dela Rosa evaded arrest and later left the premises. No local judicial warrant was involved in that attempt. Key Points on Local Court Involvement No local warrant exists — Multiple reports confirm that law enforcement (PNP, NBI) has stated they do not have a Philippine court-issued warrant. The PNP has indicated it would only act through Interpol coordination and a local court order. Ongoing legal debate: Some experts and officials (e.g., Leila de Lima, DOJ under RA 9851, OSG) argue that no additional local warrant is needed because RA 9851 allows direct enforcement/surrender for ICC cases involving crimes against humanity. Dela Rosa’s allies and some senators insist a Philippine court warrant is constitutionally required before arrest. Supreme Court petitions — Dela Rosa has filed petitions asking the SC to block the ICC warrant (e.g., for a TRO). As of the latest updates, the SC has not issued a TRO or confirmed/enforced the arrest. It has ordered comments from the government but has not ruled in a way that creates a local warrant. In summary, the arrest efforts so far rely on the ICC warrant transmitted to Philippine authorities, without a confirming local court order. The situation remains fluid, with political and legal debates continuing. THE DILEMMA WHERE LAWYERS WOULD ARGUE IS THE INADEQUACY OF THE LAW TO BE DEFINITE AND CERTAIN> THERE ARE HOLES IN THE NARRATIVE> ONE OF SUCH STRONG IMPEDIMENT IS THIS: "...no additional local warrant is needed because RA 9851 allows direct enforcement/surrender for ICC cases involving crimes against humanity..." TELL US< HOW COULD YOU CERTIFY A LEGALITY THAT HAS HOLES TO ITS MAXIM? IT WOULD RESORT TO INDIVIDUAL INTERPRETATION THUS BATO AND DUTERTE BEING KIDNAPPED AS ALLEGED IS QUITE DELIRIOUS AS THE LEGAL BATTLE IS ON THE VERGE OF BEING ETERNAL. IT WOULD ALWAYS BE A DISPUTE IN THE LEGAL CIRCLE THAT DIVERSIFIES IN INTERPRETATION>

he would come in power, the universe would shake and tremble at his coming, so why would IDF kill such?

JESUS IS POLYTHEIST JOHN 10:34-35 HOW CAN HE BE A MUSLIM?

FLAT EARTH_A CLAY TO THE SEAL! (refer to photo below) the verse isnt talking about earth per se as flat, but it talks about "ends of the earth", lets read: Job 38:13-14 [13]That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? [14]It is turned as clay to the seal; and they stand as a garment. what are ends of the earth? IT IS WHERE VAPOR COMES FROM. Jeremiah 10:13 [13]When he uttereth his voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and he causeth the vapours to ascend from the ends of the earth; he maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of his treasures. ends of the earth obviously are bodies of water bec vapors ascend from it, so what bodies of water are like clay to the seal? here is an example: at·oll /ˈatˌôl,ˈatˌäl/ noun plural noun: atolls a ring-shaped reef, island, or chain of islands formed of coral. Moreover, An atoll ( /ˈæt.ɒl,–ɔːl,–oʊl,əˈtɒl,–ˈtɔːl,–ˈtoʊl/),[1][2]sometimes known as a coral atoll, is a ring-shaped coral reef, including a coral rim that encircles a lagoon partially or completely. There may be coral islands or cays on the rim.[3] : 60 [4] Atolls are located in warm tropical or subtropical oceans and seas where corals can grow. Most of the approximately 440 atolls in the world are in the Pacific Ocean. TO SAY EARTH IS FLAT BEC OF THIS VERSE IS A MISUSE AS IT ISNT SPEAKING OF EARTH PER SE BUT ENDS OF THE EARTH WHICH ARE BODIES OF WATER. See less

THIS IS COGNITIVE DISSONANCE OF THE ACCUSER. Lets check on the verse: John 19:17 [17]And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha: clearly the verse is limited in information, it didnt confirm if he reached GOLGOTHA while carrying the cross, so its an inclusive narrative, inadequate to even conclude, its not conclusive but basically, a premise. A fill-out on the case is MARK 15:21 telling us that Jesus carried the cross in a few distance then it was redirected to another cross-bearer by the name of Symon. Its not a contradiction but merely the inadequacy of the 1st verse to be even conclusive bec its merely an incomplete narrative that needs filling-up. thanks and good morning.

ETO DAW NASA BIBLE (photo below): ETO SAGOT KO: "...compare it to science with pictures of penis and vagina and with literal description of sexual intercourse, ejaculation and sperm and everything? is that bad?..." ETO SAGOT NI GROK: "No, using accurate scientific diagrams of human anatomy (including the penis and vagina) along with literal, clinical descriptions of sexual intercourse, ejaculation, sperm production/motility, fertilization, and related biology is not bad—it is standard, evidence-based science education..." SO WHY INSINUATE THAT THE BIBLE IMAGERY IS QUITE NEGATIVE, YOU CALLED IT PORNOGRAPHY BUT HOW IS SCIENCE AS COLLATERAL? think.

compare it to science with pictures of penis and vagina and with literal description of sexual intercourse, ejaculation and sperm and everything? is that bad?

DEBUNKING "ONENESS" IN 3 SECONDS. ONENESS BELIEF states that father, son and holy spirit are not 3 persons or 3 gods but rather the same absolute being. One verse debunked it. The "individuality" verse between father and son. It says: John 6:38 [38]For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. NOT TO DO MY OWN WILL BUT THE WILL OF THE FATHER. Clearly a statement indicating the individual persons of father and son having their own and different will. It's a clear determinant that the oneness belief is wrong. This is even evident whenever Jesus prayed "our father which is in heaven..." A delineating factor to 2 separate persons, one in heaven the other on earth. Lastly, the separate persons is evident in this: 1 Peter 1:3 [3]Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, OUR LORD JESUS HAS A FATHER, logically he cannot be the father of himself. The clear statement is a corroboration that father and son having 2 different will are also distinct and separate persons. John 6:38 [38]For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. Now, is that clear?

for me, a punishment for evil and sin is justice. the thing is, punishment in hell is temporary as per Jesus parable "he cannot come out thence until he paid the uttermost farthing..." its divine justice and mercy.

CAN GOD REGROW THE FEET OF AN AMPUTEE? of course he can, he is an all-powerful god, he is powerful over all, his jurisdiction over all mankind. Jeremiah 32:27 [27]Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me? the thing is, atheists are saying where can we see an amputee with miraculously regrown feet or arms? of course, nothing spectacular phenomenon is seen as per public records but it doesnt mean there is none, the intellectuals is saying: "the absence of evidence isnt an evidence of its absence..." the possibility is wide and open, we may have not witnessed one as personally or by media etc... but its possible, there could be in some unrevealed places. why not? GOD IS OVER ALL FLESH< HIS POWER ENCAPSULATE ON ALL MEN, Isaiah 46:10 "My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure...? and that, "Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me?" something is wrong with critics, they havent seen the bigger picture yet they keep judging god like they are all-knowing, right? think.

i disagree. those included in christ rapture will not die but be changed from physical to spirit.