A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891 - 1924, by Orlando Figes,
@PenguinBooks
Orlando Figes tells the story of the Russian Revolution, emphasizing the things that support his belief that the Soviet Union was created for Russian reasons, rather than being the result of the importation of a philosophy from Western Europe (Marxism).
The book begins after the emancipation of the serfs, at which time most Russians are peasants. Even many urban workers are former peasants with ongoing ties to peasant culture, which Figes describes as xenophobic, provincial, violent, traditionalist, patriarchal, illiterate, & innumerate.
Many peasants lived & worked on community-owned land. This wasn’t a system of communal labor, with people working together on large farms; rather, a rotating roster of individual families was temporarily allowed to farm small strips of land, often in separate locations. This was inefficient compared with Western European farming systems but was resistant to reform, due to community hostility, & because vital infrastructure, such as roads & grazing grounds, were also communally owned. Unable to modernize their way out of poverty, peasants eyed the large estates owned by the aristocracy.
Meanwhile, nationalism was growing in Europe, leading non-Russian ethnic groups to increasingly demand autonomy or
#independence from the Russian empire. Additionally, Slavic and Germanic ethnonationalism was growing, along with the expectation of a showdown between these groups. The tsar hoped to galvanize the empire’s Slavs by joining the Great War in defense of fellow Slavs. But the opposite happened, as the war became increasingly costly and painful.
At this point, Figes suggests, land seizure by peasants was inevitable, Russia could no longer fight in the world war, & the struggle for power in Russia needed to be settled by military violence. Of the various political parties, only the Bolsheviks combined these three policies; so they were the winners.
Figes ends this book – published in *1996* – by warning against post-Cold War Western triumphalism: since the Soviet Union was formed for Russian reasons, there was no reason to believe that the Soviet successor would be a Western-style liberal democracy.