IUL: On 'costs twice' —
LTC: Post a quote and I'll prove to you that the IUL with chronic illness rider costs TWICE as much as a comparable LTCi policy.
IUL: On lapse rates — standalone LTC clients absorb 50-70% mid-policy rate hikes.
LTC: That's also false.
41 states have the Rate Stability Regulation. Policies sold under the Rate Stability Regulation canNOT have planned "mid policy" rate hikes of 50% to 70%. The policies under the RSR have to have actuarial certification that there is enough of a "cushion" in the pricing that there are no anticipated rate increases for the life of the policy.
IUL: On declining benefit — carrier-specific. The right policy locks the percentage at issue.
LTC: I was not referring to the percentage of the death benefit that is accelerated. I was referring to the fact that the "chronic illness" benefits are not guaranteed to grow. In fact, the "chronic illness" benefit, with most IUL's, is unknown until the time of claim.
IUL: On inflation — standalone LTC erodes the same way you're flagging. The inflation rider runs 30-50% extra premium. We're back to comparable cost.
LTC: You're saying that the IUL without guaranteed inflation growth is comparable in cost to an LTCi policy with guaranteed inflation. You're right.
IUL: Partnership Program asset protection is the one real gap. For most clients it doesn't move the decision. For some it does. Structural conversation, not a 'most of this is false' headline.
LTC: Since the IUL's cost of insurance goes up every year and goes up A LOT as they approach 70's, 80's, IUL's are a horrible way to plan for long-term care.
IUL: On 'costs twice' —
LTC: Post a quote and I'll prove to you that the IUL with chronic illness rider costs TWICE as much as a comparable LTCi policy.
IUL: On lapse rates — standalone LTC clients absorb 50-70% mid-policy rate hikes.
LTC: That's also false.
41 states have the Rate Stability Regulation. Policies sold under the Rate Stability Regulation canNOT have planned "mid policy" rate hikes of 50% to 70%. The policies under the RSR have to have actuarial certification that there is enough of a "cushion" in the pricing that there are no anticipated rate increases for the life of the policy.
IUL: On declining benefit — carrier-specific. The right policy locks the percentage at issue.
LTC: I was not referring to the percentage of the death benefit that is accelerated. I was referring to the fact that the "chronic illness" benefits are not guaranteed to grow. In fact, the "chronic illness" benefit, with most IUL's, is unknown until the time of claim.
IUL: On inflation — standalone LTC erodes the same way you're flagging. The inflation rider runs 30-50% extra premium. We're back to comparable cost.
LTC: You're saying that the IUL without guaranteed inflation growth is comparable in cost to an LTCi policy with guaranteed inflation. You're right.
IUL: Partnership Program asset protection is the one real gap. For most clients it doesn't move the decision. For some it does. Structural conversation, not a 'most of this is false' headline.
LTC: Since the IUL's cost of insurance goes up every year and goes up A LOT as they approach 70's, 80's, IUL's are a horrible way to plan for long-term care.