Not quite accurate but I understand the sentiment. The people who should have the most grievances with the high tax climate of Canadian industry is high income wage earners, who are often found in cities. However, this class is obfuscated by many of their peers who are employed by government and paid in taxpayer dollars. Any money they make is money taken elsewhere, and thus the high income private sector employee is drowned out at the ballot box and cultural forum and the Party platforms. If you are a high earning private sector employee, I’m sorry, and thank you for your productive services.
Agriculture has always been administered as a unique sector in Canada, though they’re still basically private corporations in relation to the State. The ‘Subsidies’ granted to farmers are typically tied to ideological goals and demands towards productive output. Digging a dugout for live stock? Govt grants available. Installing solar panels on your farm property? Govt grants available. Then there is the artificially low cost credit available, cash advances, etc meant to help front expense costs for operational inputs with repayment demanded upon sale of the goods. Not to mention the Province administered insurance programs. You could consider it a Corporatist framework, for the most part it is meant to ensure the continuance of productive agriculture in Canada. Some of that is for securing domestic consumption, but more and more it is a means to expand exports and thus return hard currency to help stabilize the National Account Balance. Cash crops like Canola are a big part of this.
There are a limited means in which the Canadian economy can attain the necessary inputs for an advanced technological society, most of these key products are built abroad. In order to purchase said goods, we need to sell something, anything, to the rest of the world or else no one would have any need for our currency. We are not the US, we have no ledger to create reserve currency on.
Oil is the clear and present driver of these exports which bring in foreign currency, then other more broad resource extraction activities with precious metals, fertilizer, electricity, agriculture, forestry, etc. There is very limited manufacturing we can sell to the world, and that world is mostly the United States, and that is mostly dependent upon their willingness to establish industry with American capital here and use Canadian labour and currency arbitrage to cheapen particular supply lines and undercut others. Or more specialized manufacturing sectors that have similar or more egregious subsidy schemes than agriculture.
But still, our Canadian cities are dependent upon these export industries in the hinterlands to maintain their own economies, which often revolve around the large banks which finance those endeavours, and more tertiary industries servicing those employed there as well as the plethora of govt institutions. Much of the small manufacturing still in Canadian cities are not export oriented, but sell specialized goods to our export oriented industries.
About the tax breaks and the trucks.. The tax regime currently in Canada, for industry, is to maximally re-invest profits (turning money made in to expenses) to grow the productive capacity of the business. Make a profit on a good year? Lose 50% to govt. Make a bunch of money and spend it all on equipment? Now you made no profit, and paid far less tax, and have more (theoretically productive) assets. Congrats. Ironically, the solution may be to lower tax on high income earners all around to incentivize profiting, thus diversifying where the wealth generated by these business owners is being spent. Then they may buy less trucks, and more localized recreational activities or cultural products.
Ya the farmers are exploiting the taxpayers in the city via subsidies and tax breaks for F150s. Apologiyto my chud allies