The US government spends nearly 5 trillion a year. Can you imagine how many problems they could solve if they seized Elons 1 trillion?

The foundation of the trans ideology is that sex and gender are different, but the goal of the ideology, to gain access to spaces meant for the opposite sex, requires them to conflate sex and gender thus contradicting their own foundation.

40 year old man tries to enrol in an actual Middle School. Gets told they can't be admitted because of their age. The 40 year old is enraged, claims they hate him for his age, cries agism. He then goes on BlueSky and posts "This is exactly what the gays went through"

"Capitalism demands you work or you starve" That ain't Capitalism retard, that's the second law of thermodynamics.

The people who claim @spencerpratt is too inexperienced to run the second largest city in the US don't seem to have a problem with someone with the same level of experience running the largest city in the US...

The left: "Could somebody please 'do something' about Trump so we can celebrate while smearing you as a right winger because we would never admit to engaging in political violence even though we constantly advocate for it?"

Me on my way to rid the wasteland of its king.

The IOC when they finally listen to trans activists and create a policy so changing your gender doesn't let you compete with the opposite sex because sex and gender are different then the trans activists get mad at you.

It's makes no sense why the trans community are upset with the new IOC policy because it aligns with what they have been saying for years. They told us sex and gender are different, yet before this policy a person who changed their gender could compete with the opposite sex. By allowing this, the IOC was conflating sex and gender. This new policy means changing your gender doesn't allow you to compete with the opposite sex, which aligns with the beliefs of the trans community, that sex and gender are different.

"Why do you care if society crumbles around you? It's none of your business"

It's hilarious how the left pretend left wing governments of the past cared dearly about the environment.

It's hilarious how the people who still clutch their pearls over January 6th are basically in open warfare with the government.

Using the left definition of bootlicker they are bootlickers because they opposed the rioters on January 6th.

BREAKING: The fascist Trump government just arrested Raul Gutierrez for protesting ICE while being latino. So much for the first amendment...

In the next few days the people who stole weapons and documents from federal vehicles will be arrested and the left will claim they got arrested for protesting ICE. Not a single one of them will mention what actually happened.

The student walk out to protest ICE is a great way to teach them to oppose democracy. If your side doesn't win then throw a fit, get angry, impede the federal government etc. If your side does win and your opposition acts the same way you do them call them terrorists.

It's wild how many groups and organisations exist for the sole purpose of impeding the federal government from carrying out basic government functions. Countless governors openly demanding immigration control to stay away from their cities so illegal immigrants can just stay.

Jacob Frey, the Mayor of Minneapolis, is pretty based. He took down his Somalian challenger by invoking ancient blood feuds. He took a page out of the colonialism playbook and it paid off.

Had to use an image from the past because this is the real difference today

This post is economic illiteracy on full display. It confuses valuation with cash, wealth with money, and production with redistribution, which is the basic economic error behind almost every grievance like this. Musk’s “money” exists as ownership stakes in capital goods that coordinate labor, technology, risk, and time across millions of voluntary exchanges. You cannot “pay Social Security” with factories, code, satellites, or future expectations without liquidating them, collapsing the very structures that generate income and wages in the first place. Even if you could vaporize that equity into spendable dollars, you would fund a fraction of an actuarially bankrupt program for a brief moment while destroying the productive engine that sustains it. Wealth is created through entrepreneurial coordination under uncertainty, not hoarded as a static pile waiting to be reassigned. Social Security’s problem is not a shortage of billionaires to harvest but a political design that ignores time preference, demographics, and capital accumulation. Calling this “taken” is a refusal to understand value creation, price signals, and economic calculation. The claim sounds moral because it avoids thinking, and it persists because it treats prosperity as loot rather than as a fragile process that collapses the moment you start eating the machinery. No one is poor because someone else is rich. That framing assumes a fixed pie that never grows, which is the opposite of how markets work. If Musk were actually sitting on a giant pile of idle cash, which he is not, that would signal enormous voluntary demand for what he produces and it would be deflationary. Idle money lowers prices because it is not competing for resources. You cannot eat money or build with it. You can only exchange it, and exchange happens when value is offered and accepted. The federal government spends in a single year an amount in the same range as the combined net worth of all US billionaires. Confiscate every dollar, pretend you could convert equity into cash without market collapse, and the state is funded for one year. Just one. The next year there is nothing left to tax and far less productive capacity to draw from. This is why the state is the worst possible steward of capital. It faces no profit and loss discipline, operates on political incentives, rewards compliance over competence, spends other people’s money, and optimizes for short electoral horizons rather than long-term coordination. People default to this zero-sum thinking because it feels intuitive and morally satisfying. It offers a villain, absolves personal responsibility, and replaces economic reasoning with resentment dressed up as justice. It persists because it flatters the believer while demanding no understanding of how value is actually created. It is a huge problem and they should be rebuked accordingly.