2021 Syria UAP Video: Proof of Alien Technology of Something Prosaic? After combining my original analysis of the video that was released in February of this year from @JeremyCorbell (has me blocked), along with verifying information through AI, and a recent interview with a former USAF RPA Sensor Operator, I published my second article on Medium that breaks down the technical information that explains why the object doesn’t actually exhibit “instantaneous acceleration”. Check it out and let me know what you think. medium.com/@paranormalchris6…

Analyzed simply as a movie, “Disclosure Day” was a failure. Will go into more details in a later “Missive from Babylon,” but here is my summary: —Acting: not good (a few moments excepted) —Music score: shockingly unmemorable, given that it was written by John Williams —Story: uninteresting; countless missed opportunities; explained almost nothing; it didn’t dive into any fascinating lore, or present a compelling narrative —Writing: often bad; dialogue didn’t work in many places; came off forced/contrived —Theology/Philosophy: utterly shallow; felt like “New Atheist” level of “thinking”: clearly intended to subvert the Catholic Faith at every turn, given its ubiquitous use of Catholic imagery and themes It had some good/funny moments here and there. But overall, a massive failure. It felt like it was put together super fast and haphazardly. Even its use of CGI was bad. I went to “Disclosure Day” quite literally for research purposes—to study what kind of messages powerful forces in our society want to put out there. I’ll definitely have more thoughts on that, but what I experienced was simply a bad film. The worst Spielberg I’ve ever seen.

Disclosure Day is getting ripped apart by critics. Clearly, I’m with the majority that was severely disappointed in the film.

This is EXACTLY how my movie review would go for Disclosure Day if I did movie reviews in podcast form. I feel your pain @WeWatchedAMovie

This is appalling and disgusting behavior by a supposed “grown man”. Here’s the deal: Nobody should be saying “I’m glad your kid isn’t here” and it is evil, disgusting rhetoric. Kids are prone to being influenced and naive. They make mistakes but they’re all supposed to be able to live to learn from it. No matter who’s wrong or right, every kid should be able to be alive to learn from their mistakes and grow to be better. This message is disgusting, honestly. If you think kids are better off being in the ground, then you are just as appalling and disgusting as the act itself and I hope this guy never adds to the population. Imagine being so caught up in a case that has no relevance to you in the slightest that you post a video to the world to see where you claim you’re glad a kid is dead in the ground. Social media really does bring out the absolute worst in people. x.com/therobbieharvey/status…

Masters of the Universe > Disclosure Day…and it’s not even close.

The movie is just as bad as your takes on the UFO topic. You might actually enjoy it @TimothyAlberino

Disclosure Day was like if Spielberg just read the captions for all of Jesse Michels (@AlchemyAmerican) posts of his goofy podcast episodes of whistleblowers, UFOs, unrealistic technology, combined them, asked ChatGPT to make a script using key talking points, edit in some atrocious CGI VFX, and said “make me a movie about Disclosure”. It’s THAT bad and unbelievable.

It really is THAT bad. I was texting/messaging people during the movie and found myself looking around watching other people’s reaction. I did see two people walk out of my theater.

Disclosure Day is the worst movie of the decade 🍿

Disclosure Day was was a let down. Character development and depth was nonexistent. The dialogue sounded like they ran 8 years of ufo podcasts into ChatGPT and asked it to write a script. CGI was cheesy. No explanation of NHI origin or intents.

Take Steven Spielberg's name off Disclosure Day and slap M Night Shyamalan's name on it and its a 12% Rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. Guaranteed.

“Listen” #DisclosureDay

In regard to the newest UFO video over a pond that was dropped today, it appears that there is some evidence that a fire was videoed that night. According to the information below, there was a fire pit near the water but after some time after the incident in November, the investigators inspected the area in December and stated that “there did not appear to be any evidence of recent burns as the ground was blanketed with leaves”. It does not state that they removed the leaves in the area to inspect if there were burn marks underneath. Leaves can fall and pile up real quick in a short amount of time, especially if there is heavy winds or rains/storms. Could very well have been a campfire that also reflected in the water from the angle of the video was taken. I also still think boat on the water night fishing could still be a possibility as well.

First impression: Chinese Lanterns?

So, apparently this is a new UFO video from “October 2024 at approximately 1851 local time in the northeastern United States” released per the White House, vetted by the FBI, but the information and video is terrible. Supposedly the object is: - below the horizon - hovering 2,700 ft above a pond - supposedly changing shape and “luminosity” - supposedly separates into another light source - apparently hovers for “45 minutes” above the water but doesn’t show a reflection - taken from someone “highly credible” with an iPhone and only altered to protect the person’s identify. You really can’t make anything out from this video. Parallax playing an issue as the camera is so far zoomed in and the person recording moving the phone but the software in the phone is trying to stabilize the object. Idk but it looks like someone might be videoing a fisherman doing a little night fishing with a weird angle from the cameraman and some parallax making it appear the object is hovering. @MickWest @flarkey @kyle_ferriter x.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/…

Here’s a clip of the recent speech by UFO “whistleblower” David Grusch with what I feel are important details in regards to Grusch’s claims of: - An investigation into a potential unauthorized disclosure after his 2023 Congressional testimony - His medical retirement somehow being adversely effected by that investigation - Illegal “slush funds” into programs He (allegedly) has an active TS clearance, so the claim of the investigation into an unauthorized disclosure is actually just common. It most likely was just triggered to ensure it didn’t happen. Since he still has a minimum of a TS clearance, either the investigation is ongoing (not likely) or the investigation was completed without issue. He should know this is standard practice when you make claims to the national media and Congress that could have contained sensitive information. That triggers an investigation. They’re just working with agencies to ensure he didn’t. The medical retirement claim is most likely false. Grusch separated from the Air Force reserves, he didn’t retire. If he separated and was medically retired, his benefits (payments) would have started almost immediately. His whistleblower claims would not have effected a medical retirement or payments unless he was found guilty of treason or something punishable by prison time. If he’s fighting with the VA to get disability ratings for a high payout, that process could take months to years, depending on if he had proper paperwork documenting service-related injuries. And the VA is not very fast when it comes to that process…but they will backpay you if you are entitled to the benefit. It’s unclear what his actual issue is but his whistleblower claims and issues shouldn’t stop medical compensation or benefits. The slush fund claim is Grusch’s golden ticket. It’s the only claim he has made that might actually have legs only in reference to widely reported and historically documented issues with spending within the defense sector over the last decade. Just because someone can prove a program might have had some funding outside of oversight doesn’t mean it validates one’s claims that it is also a UAP-related “Legacy” program having to do with aliens. But I’m assuming that Grusch thinks if he can get that investigated, it will out the program and justify his claims? Again, it’s his golden ticket, especially given everything else he’s claimed hasn’t been substantiated other than his reprisal claims which was found to be FALSE. He wasn’t reprised against; he had previous security violations and behavioral issues that flagged in the system that hindered him access when he needed it for work. But Grusch was informed of that and still kept that from the public, claiming “it’s a conspiracy against me and my knowledge of UFOs!”