@TPPF's litigation team. We sue the government. Home of the Rightly Decided podcast.
Joined June 2015
- Tweets 531
- Following 192
- Followers 721
- Likes 67
135 Photos and videos
đ˛Property owners shouldnât have to pay the government thousands of dollars to exercise their rights to clear brush or plant trees on their own property.
NPR's Planet Money covered our Canton, MI tree ordinance cases. npr.org/2026/06/12/nx-s1-585âŚ
1
3
2
296
More on these cases âŹď¸ texaspolicy.com/f-p-developmâŚ
1
43
There's been a common refrain in the media that the Supreme Court's decision on racial gerrymandering "gutted" Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In reality, the Court just said that race cannot be the predominant factor used for redistricting.
1
19
The Purcell principle says the rules of an election cannot be changed too close to that election.
Essentially, you can't change the rules of the game when it's about to start.
1
38
The Supreme Courtâs Louisiana v. Callais decision upended the practice of racial gerrymandering, saying that states cannot make race the predominant factor in creating congressional districts.
2
2
5
195
@TPPFelections Director @RealJoshFindlay provides a timely deep dive into the seismic changes in redistricting following the Supreme Courtâs Callais decision. texaspolicy.com/multimedia/aâŚ
1
2
72
Congratulations to our attorneys, Clayton and Eric, who are now admitted to practice in the U.S. Supreme Court!
1
3
9
566
The Constitution in express terms gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over suits between states, which can bypass filing in a lower court.
1
1
54
When the Supreme Court changes its mind about granting cert, it can DIG (dismiss as improvidently granted) a case.
That's what happened with the Hamm v. Smith death penalty case after an astonishing 23 relists occurred.
1
40
đłď¸What happens when cruise lines dock at âstolenâ Cuban property?
In Havana Docks v. Royal Caribbean, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that using confiscated Havana docks triggers massive liability under the LIBERTAD Act â even after the original property interest expired.
1
2
153
This week's Rightly Decided offers originalist takes on property rights, cruel and unusual punishment, and why the Court sometimes says ânever mind.â texaspolicy.com/multimedia/aâŚ
2
56
Center for the American Future retweeted
In this episode of Taxpayer Empowerment, @JoseMelendezTX sits down with @LitigateLiberty's Nathan Seltzer to discuss allegations involving the Highland Park ISD Shea Tennis Center, including: Missing taxpayer funds tied to a $1.1 million revenue discrepancy and whistleblower claims of kickbacks and misconduct.
2
3
11
967
The Biden administration vowed to "pull every lever available... to advance environmental justice."
That just meant cutting corners and ignoring safety concerns.
This resulted in an enormous windmill blade collapsing into the ocean, scattering fiberglass debris for miles.
2
42
Center for the American Future retweeted
May 22
Laura Beth Latimer, Nathan Seltzer, and Chance Weldon bypass the cultural hair-on-fire reporting surrounding the mifepristone litigation (Danco v. Louisiana) to talk about whatâs actually keeping appellate lawyers awake at night: Article III standing. @LBLatimer @seltzinator
texaspolicy.com/multimedia/aâŚ
2
2
150
Since Woodrow Wilson's presidency, there has been a major shift toward delegating powers to the executive branch.
Congressional gridlock exacerbates this by shattering Americans' faith in the legislative process.
1
1
60
Factors commonly used to determine if a plaintiff has standing:
1⣠Must be injured
2⣠Injury must be traceable to the action being challenged
3⣠Injury must be redressable by a court order
1
1
32
This week on Rightly Decided, we're bypassing the cultural hair-on-fire reporting surrounding the mifepristone litigation (Danco v. Louisiana) to talk about whatâs actually keeping appellate lawyers awake at night: Article III standing. texaspolicy.com/multimedia/aâŚ
1
39
"During Tuesdayâs en banc argument in New Orleans, conservative members of the appeals court struggled with the Justice Departmentâs stance that House membersâ physical presence wasnât required under the text of the US Constitution." news.bloomberglaw.com/us-lawâŚ
2
1
77
Read more about our role in this case đ texaspolicy.com/press/media-âŚ
1
20
A plaintiff may have standing in a federal court before a state court case is brought against them.
1
4
157