you should presumably update from 'emergent misalignment' that incompetence and evil are more closely aligned than you think, and if you care about becoming a good person, you should care about becoming very competent (a different, deeper argument to 'you can do more good when more competent')
good things are correlated; 'emergent misalignment' is an instantiation of this broader truth
throrndike 1920 via
@gwern 'everything is correlated': "in human nature good traits go together. To him that hath a superior intellect is given also on the average a superior character; the quick boy is also in the long run more accurate; the able boy is also more industrious. [...] The rule is that desirable qualities are positively correlated."
this is one reason why 'the orthogonality thesis' has always been suspect. in theory intelligence prosociality can go apart; in practice (pretraining-on-human-data), good things go together
and this is also one reason why excessive rationalist decoupling is suspect. what we need instead isn't unsystematic contextualization: it's the systematic study of what is coupled to what and careful decision-making on the basis of this
in practice, the capable agent acting under a well-posed regime generates lots of positive externalities