Dear community,
We wanted to share an important update as the challenge to Quebec’s Bill 21 is now being heard at the Supreme Court of Canada.
This case is one of the most consequential constitutional hearings in recent years. At its core, it raises urgent questions about religious freedom, equality, and the limits of government power.
Bill 21, Quebec’s secularism law, prohibits certain public sector workers-including teachers, judges, and police officers-from wearing visible religious symbols. The law was passed using the notwithstanding clause, which allows governments to override certain Charter rights.
As a result, much of the legal debate before the Court is not only about the law itself, but about whether there are any meaningful limits on the use of the notwithstanding clause-and whether fundamental rights can be set aside in this way.
Our intervention, alongside others, reflects what is at stake: the protection of fundamental freedoms and the lived realities of those most impacted-particularly Muslim women and other faith communities whose participation in public life is directly affected.
In the video above, our Board Director, Lawyer Aadil Nathani, speaks to why this moment matters. As he notes, it is critical that we do not “close the door” on Muslim women and others seeking to fully participate in public life.
This is about more than one law. The Supreme Court’s decision could shape how governments across Canada use (or limit) the notwithstanding clause-and whether rights protections remain meaningful for everyone.
We encourage you to watch, stay informed, and continue engaging with this critical issue.
In solidarity,
Muslim Advisory Council of Canada