Since my knowledge of Spengler’s work is being criticised by some Portuguese political commentator I am going to have to defend myself adequately.
Spengler was an adherent of the prussian socialist ethos for the earlier years of his time as an author, yes, later he was a proponent of capitalism, not that that matters to you, or that you where aware of that, but simply because he believed in a political ethos does not mean he was of the opinion that this was the morphological necessity for our next civilizational stage, in the contrary: Spengler pointed out in Hour of Decision that there would be internal wars (ww1, ww2, in a sense also the cold war, though less so) fought over the future of the West. The side Spengler associates with Prussianism and his brand of socialism, ie, Germany, lost those wars. The ethos along which the West will be streamlined in the future is that of the Anglo, capitalist, robber baron, akin to some resemblance to Cecil Rhodes.
Yes, Caesarism will ‘destroy money’ because Caesarism is a representative of the dimensions Blood and Time within the Spenglerian system.
But simply saying that Caesarism is ‘socialist’, anti-money and a dictatorship, is a very shallow understanding of Spengler, and in fact detrimental to the matter at hand, ie.: ‘teaching people Spengler’s work’, because it dumbs it down to a level where it just sounds like he is arguing for national socialism, which is not at all what Caesarism nor what Spengler is doing.
Caesarism is formlessness, pure power, no rules, no system of conduct, the masses live from the hand to the mouth, the powerful rule with the sword in their hand, dealing out death and destruction on the fields where their forefathers sowed corn.
To explain Spengler in such a manner as Guilermo did is as if I explained Nietzsche like this:
‘Nietzsche is basically the philosopher who said ‘God is dead,’ so he just means people should stop believing in religion and instead become strong individuals who do whatever they want. His Übermensch is like a superhero who makes his own rules, and his whole philosophy is just about saying yes to life.’
Possibly correct on a surface level but incredibly shallow.
O cidadão acusa o
@guilherme94jose de não ter lido Spengler ou de tê-lo distorcido, mas pelos comentários no tópico é ele quem claramente nunca leu o autor.
Sim, Spengler era socialista e sim, Spengler literalmente coloca o cesarismo nos termos de uma ditadura que rompe o domínio do espírito burguês e reestrutura a política segundo outra escala de valores.