Inventor & Founder, Baur Research.
Joined January 2011
- Tweets 91,345
- Following 2,927
- Followers 416
- Likes 244
Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Jan 20
@NASA @NASAArtemis @JimFree @SciGuySpace
Artemis II has a math problem. On Feb 10, watch for a 145–180 kg propellant surplus that NASA's models can't explain. I am timestamping this prediction 17 days before launch. Telemetry will confirm. (1/2)
3
4
7,047
Jun 4
Nope, to get 1200 comes naturally from any normal pulling speed, and can only be altered at extremes.
1
136
Jun 1
Nope, that is a delusion.
It is terrible failure rate and we are so incompetent that it is literally dangerous to send people up.
1
161
May 31
If there is a scientist on this planet who is not a low life lying piece of trash fraud then can you please address my paper logically and support publication because it cannot be faulted and stop the mass psychosis cover up that is happening and make a difference to the world?
2
180
May 21
Quantum physics is bullshit and anyone who imagines that reality could possibly behave like Quantum mechanics fantasise, is weird.
Nothing personal.
I just think physicists have gone totally insane in a group think mentally deficient, opposite of science, evade evidence manner.
8
1
2,132
May 19
Every other mathematical physics paper in history is dealt with by faulting the maths or conceding.
But mine can just be neglected because people do not like the conclusion.
Is that mentally retarded?
2
333
May 19
I have a group of scientists literally stalking me and slandering me to anyone who engages with me in order to prevent that my discovery is listened to because they can't fault my maths.
And they are successful.
I have a very simple discovery and they succeed with coverup.
1
293
May 10
The fact that I am allowed to communicate either with an ai pretending to be a human and going in circles, or not at all with anyone on X, makes it obvious what is going on here, but If I have to state it, it makes me sound insane.
1
262
May 6
Why do scientists literally lie about what the textbook says or implies, and then accuse me of lying about what the textbook says when I point out what the textbook says?
It says that there is no torque in example 10 and scientists are telling me that I am lying???????
3
655
May 6
Why is my twitter feed filled only with stupid content about victims of narcissism when my focus has never been that and I am only here to discuss the fact that angular momentum is not conserved?
Is my feed being manipulated by people who are afraid of my discovery?
2
1
2
247
Apr 23
Why are people afraid to face the fact that angular momentum is not conserved?
Is their life's worth dependent upon being wrong?
1
2
405
John Mandlbaur retweeted
Feb 22
The sine of 5° is around 0.1. so 10% of the force is acting on the direction of motion. That's not a small amount. The force increases as the radius reduces. You say "no component", yet the maths says 10%. That's why you're getting nowhere.
3
1
3
1,198
Feb 7
Why is modern science about making excuses for bad predictions instead of about trying to make accurate predictions by rejecting theory which makes bad predictions?
1
4
399
Jan 29
If conservation of angular momentum has never been violated then why is it not possible to present a single valid and genuine example where it has been confirmed convincingly?
1
5
602
Jan 20
@NASA @NASAArtemis @JimFree @SciGuySpace
Artemis II has a math problem. On Feb 10, watch for a 145–180 kg propellant surplus that NASA's models can't explain. I am timestamping this prediction 17 days before launch. Telemetry will confirm. (1/2)
3
4
7,047
Jan 20
This surplus is caused by the invariance of tangential velocity (W=0). NASA is over-fueling due to a vis-viva calculation error.
Full predictive audit and DOI timestamp here: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18309…
#Artemis #Physics #ArtemisII (2/2)
2
2
382
Jan 15
Can orbital mechanics survive the Work-Energy Theorem? Identifying a critical velocity residual in the SEDS-2 radar logs that proves radial forces perform zero work (W=0). The 6.57 kg discrepancy is now public: space.stackexchange.com/q/70…
#Physics #NASA #OrbitalMechanics
1
222
Jan 5
If science is a process then why do scientists have a closed mind to the possibility that an established theory may have been misinterpreted qualitatively and accept that quantification falsifies it?
1
2
406
Jan 1
Science cannot explain why an ice skater spins faster when they pull in their arms.
They think they can but no peer reviewed paper confirms the predictions of the theory. So scientists are incompetent. And insulting me instead of recognizing their incompetence. How do i proceed?
1
3
275
29 Dec 2025
When did the theory become more important than the scientific method?
2
247