In NY, a homeowner building a garage, a farmer expanding a barn, or a small business improving their property can spend years navigating environmental reviews, permits, hearings, and litigation.
But when a politically favored solar developer wants to industrialize thousands of acres, Albany suddenly finds a shortcut.
The Fort Edward Solar project exposes the double standard.
This isn’t an abandoned industrial site. It’s a grassland habitat recognized for its environmental significance and home to vulnerable species.
For most New Yorkers, impacts like these would trigger intense scrutiny and could easily result in denial.
Yet through ORES, state policy starts with a different assumption: the project moves forward, and the impacts are ignored.
Albany tells us farmland must be preserved. Habitat must be protected. Local voices must be heard.
But when those priorities collide with state energy mandates, the rules change.
That’s what frustrates so many New Yorkers: The sheer hypocrisy.
If these lands are worth protecting, protect them. If environmental standards matter, apply them consistently. And if local communities are expected to live with the consequences, their voices should matter before—not after—the decision is made.
Albany cannot claim to be protecting farmland, habitat, and local control while using ORES to override all three. Local voices matter. ORES should be disbanded.
Thank you
@NassauExec! He’s referencing Fort Edward Solar, the industrial complex I am fighting for by my farm.
This grassland carries numerous environmental designations, including being a DEC-designated grassland habitat that’s home to 10 of the 11 top species of concern in the entire STATE!
They cannot build this 100MW complex, owned by Canada, in the middle of American ecological excellence.
It stops with Fort Edward.