AI Product Leader | Enterprise AI governance & portfolio strategy | Former IBM | Writing a series on building AI tools that are useful — and survive governance
Hidden knowledge-work taxes look small alone: context rebuilds, task switches, re-explaining, re-deciding.
Add them up: ~90 min/day. A full workday each week. Nine workweeks a year.
Gone — on an invoice no one totals.
Today’s piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/adding-up… via @LinkedIn
1/ Most AI productivity advice stops at “build the system.”
The harder question is:
Can you trust it?
I just posted Part 2 of my series recap: Articles 16–20, where the system starts proving its value.
🧵
9/ The next stretch is where the series gets more opinionated:
security, data boundaries, verifiable compliance, and human-in-the-loop design.
Not just what AI can do.
What it can’t.
10/ Full Part 2 carousel is here:
linkedin.com/posts/marcusmay…
Question:
For an AI tool you’d actually trust, what matters more — what it can do, or what it can’t?
Complex decisions usually aren’t hard because of the judgment.
They’re hard because the context is scattered.
When the full picture is already assembled, the decision gets easier — and faster.
That’s decision readiness.
Today’s piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/decision-… via @LinkedIn
A question most productivity tools avoid:
Does this make your mind quieter or busier?
Capability is easy to judge. It’s the wrong measure.
A system that adds mental load hasn’t helped — it just renamed the burden.
Today’s piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/real-meas… via @LinkedIn
Most people hold work as a flat to-do list.
A portfolio is different: workstreams with state — stage, status, blockers, ownership, and priority.
A list tells you what’s next. A portfolio shows the state of everything.
Today’s piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/portfolio… via @LinkedIn
A personal system is still a filing system if you’re the one doing the connecting.
The shift: one AI engine reading across every component and returning one answer to a question no single component can answer.
Today’s piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/synthesis… via @LinkedIn
Every tool treats people as contacts. Almost none treat them as relationships.
A contact tells you how to reach someone — not how to work with them: what they care about now, what you last discussed.
That state is operational.
linkedin.com/pulse/stakehold… via @LinkedIn
Most commitments don't fail because someone forgot them. They fail because the context around them got lost.
A commitment without its context is inert — you defer it again.
The fix isn't "remember harder." It's an action register.
linkedin.com/pulse/action-re… via @LinkedIn
Almost every productivity tool tells you the current state of things. Almost none tell you how they got there.
State overwrites itself. History doesn't.
A few structured lines a day is the temporal memory most systems skip.
Today's piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/daily-log… via @LinkedIn
Most people treat notes as a place to put things down.
It's also why most people's notes are useless three weeks later. The note captured the words; the meaning lived in your head.
Today's piece: notes as operating memory, not a pile.
linkedin.com/pulse/structure… via @LinkedIn
The first version of my system was embarrassingly simple. Plain text files. No automation. Updated by hand.
That wasn't a limitation. It was the design.
Automate before you understand it and you encode untested assumptions.
Today's piece:
linkedin.com/pulse/why-i-sta… via @LinkedIn