New HIGH OCTANE theory focused video on how Collectivists deny reality. youtube.com/watch?v=srdLfJbX…

You know how the DNC will say they will implement more socialist policies and muh free stuff, then they don't and just maintain the status quo? The GOP does the same thing with libertarianism. Promises libright experiments, then doesn't follow up, and maintains the status quo.

Trump is a failure on policy for deciding to go full boomer neocon, but culturally he has always been far more grounded. Not that the previous administration left a high bar or anything.

Trans ideology is intrinsically connected to subjectivism and care/harm morality, which concludes that people are to be enslaved to others feelings.

MMORPGs that don't have PvP are automatically bad.

Sometimes the x algo just picks the perfect first post.

"Muh no Blacks Jury" seems to be the standard redditoid cope with the Karmelo Anthony case. This never comes with a refutation of why it happens: vetting for bias and competence often reveals that a Black will refuse to return a guilty verdict regardless of evidence.

I have come to the irrefutable conclusion that Gigafly is a gem.

THE HOUR OF REDPILLS RETURNS: The latest Quarterly Questions/Answers video is out, with a nice mix of some libertarian theory, general philosophy, and some good ol' memes. youtube.com/watch?v=bJLgCdED…

It’s so funny how you only see leftists saying this. Almost like it’s a strawman that they conjured out of thin air.

Random reminder that the default assumption should always be that a socialist is lying about the numbers they cite.

I kind of genuinely feel sorry for any above average IQ Blacks right now, who are fully aware that they are going to be wrongfully blamed for this third world style ape behavior.

>Pronouns in bio >Brainrot opinion These days it's always either this or an Indian engagement bait grifter.

Years of idpol for everyone but White people and trashlibs are confused why the shaming isn't working anymore.

"Waaaaah she swaid swomething offwensive waaaaah. I shall now use my clout to try and ruin her life."

Logical conclusions:

It will never stop being funny that the lower IQ members of the left unironically believe that emotional outbursts count as rebuttal.

This is a very important nuance that will immediately expose a midwit. Oftentimes definitions and classifications as put forth by the Cathedral will just be varying degrees of doublespeak for the sake of political correctness. For example, the idea that transgenderism is not a mental illness. This was entirely by an arbitrary reclassification by the WHO and the APA. They reframed it from "Gender Identity Disorder" to "Gender Dysphoria" to remove it from "disorder / MI" lists. This was not the result of any new research or groundbreaking empirical study. No new evidence about the etiology of transgenderism or its psychological disposition was taken into consideration with this decision. It was entirely done just to reduce "stigma", and they even admit this. In other words, it no longer being considered a "mental illness" was done to make trans people feel better about themselves. But objectively, nothing had actually changed. Midwits will often self expose by showing that they don't understand this. They will cite "cutting edge" updates to academic consensus as proof that they are correct while completely missing the reasons for why the shift in consensus happened. Sometimes changes are due to legitimate discoveries in the evidence. But sometimes it's all nonsense. The whole "Muh advanced biology" cope is an example of when it's very much 100% nonsense.

Aside from the inherent corruption that comes with the non-productive nature of politicians, the big problem with them is that they don't even criticize each other properly. Anyone can look up the full quote from Trump here and see that he isn't actually saying he believes inflation is good. He is saying the inflation numbers aren't bad for wartime inflation, and will thus look good when the war is over. Which is technically true, but stupid to say for other reasons, such as: -We shouldn't even be in this war in the first place. -Trumps admin engages in as much inflationary spending as Biden did and has all but betrayed DOGE. -The fed budget deficits have been as bad as Biden's as well ( $1.5~2 Trillion dollar range ). -Before the War Trump was doing better on inflation than the Biden admin did, but still had yet to bring the rate down to the level of his previous term. -Trump floats "ideas" for reducing spending and taxes and reducing the crony regulations that cause housing and healthcare to be artificially scarcer than they ordinarily would be, but then never follows up, and so costs for these two crucial resources remains high. -The structure of the system has not changed. Newsom could have chosen to criticize Trump's full statement using any one of the above as a basis for an accurate and correct attack on what Trump is doing. But of course, because his party is just as guilty of most of these problems ( and likely would make them worse ), he instead chooses to deliberately take the quote out of context and pander to low IQ votercattle who won't bother to understand the nuances. In other words, he intentionally fails here because he knows voters remaining ignorant is good for his grift. That's why he makes a disingenuous political jab, instead of saying anything of real value.