If you follow me for Canadian digital policy, copyright, and AI regulation, the deeper analysis lives on my Substack - including every Law Bytes podcast episode embedded in full. Free to subscribe: mgeist.substack.com/

Well past midnight and the votes continue on Bill C-22 amendments. Just amendment numbers with no discussion, no debate, and no way for the public to even know what is being voted on.

The government has pushed through its motion to end debate on Bill C-22, forcing the committee into a late night hearing going on right now that no one will watch or can follow to pass the bill and send to the House. An absolute democratic embarrassment. parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en…

🚨 BREAKING - The government just called a vote on their motion to end debate on Bill C-22. Clause by clause could wrap tonight with the government's amendments effectively rammed through.

You're gutting the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and mandating metadata retention and backdoors to data C'mon man

With the government cutting off Bill C-22 debate, reports say they will make a few modest changes to lawful access bill, including mandatory metadata retention for 6 months (vs. 1 year), encryption clarification, and two year expiry of ministerial orders. thestar.com/politics/federal…

With Minister @gary_srp invoking "you're with us or with the criminals" language as the government seeks to shut down debate on Bill C-22, he would do well to remember how Liberal MPs reacted to that approach years ago on a different lawful access bill. x.com/mgeist/status/20672320…

CCLA joined over 35 leading civil society groups and experts today in calling the federal government out for failing to apply privacy rules and oversight to federal political parties. The risks here are real--just last month, a political party-enabled data breach exposed personal information of 2.9 million Albertans. Federal political parties have gone to great lengths to avoid subjecting themselves to any meaningful privacy restrictions, even as political campaigning relies on more and more of our sensitive data. In fact, the federal government just tabled a bill updating our privacy laws earlier this week, yet failed once again to apply these rules to political parties. Join us in calling on the government to apply effective privacy rules to federal political parties by signing this parliamentary petition: ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/P… Read the letter: ccla.org/press-release/civil…

“The new commission is still on the drawing board, but it is being overloaded with so many responsibilities that you have to wonder whether it will be crushed under its own weight before it can be stood up.” theglobeandmail.com/politics…

Excellent masthead editorial on the flawed Online Streaming Act: “the government would take money from web giants and give the money to struggling creators of Canadian stories and music. Unfortunately, like the tale of Robin Hood, it was mostly fictional.” theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…

In 2012, Liberals condemned Vic Toews for telling lawful access critics they could “stand with us or with the child pornographers." Now @gary_srp, shutting down Bill C-22 debate, tells critics to "choose" between police and victims. Same shameful playbook. michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/gary…

That expert would be me. To see a Liberal cabinet minister adopt the Vic Toews’ “you’re with us or with the criminals” style language on lawful access should be the signal that the government has lost its way on Bill C-22.

Professor Geist is being polite. I'm watching the SECU hearings in real time and the Bill C-22 is exactly the same deeply problematic Bill that was tabled by the Minister. Not one word has changed. The spokesperson is full of shit.

In the last 24 hours, government has announced plans to eviscerate the Privacy Commissioner’s office, cut off debate on a lawful access bill that includes metadata retention, and reversed age verification privacy safeguards 5 days after introducing them. x.com/mgeist/status/20666607…

Gaslighting in the extreme: the government is literally cutting off debate on amendments to actually change in the bill, yet “a spokesperson for Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, said the bill has undergone changes to address concerns.” theglobeandmail.com/politics…

The Privacy Commissioner is a professional who would never publicly say otherwise on the day a bill is introduced, but the government’s plan to eviscerate his Office and remove responsibility for private sector privacy regulation is hardly to be welcomed. x.com/EvanLSolomon/status/20…

Great breakdown of the government’s plan to ram through Bill C-22 from @mgeist michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/gove…

Bill C-22 is 72 pages long: parl.ca/Content/Bills/451/Go… It raises serious privacy and civil rights issues. No worry: the government is going to give #SECU Committee 30 minutes to review it, and then each party gets 20 minutes to raise concerns in @OurCommons. What could go wrong?

Here’s the basic question for the government: how does eliminating the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s role in regulating private-sector privacy and replacing it with a super-regulator with less independence and less expertise improve Canadians’ privacy? x.com/mgeist/status/20666607…