Breaking big in the election fraud arena, big things going to happen. Multiple fronts, its coming Patriots.🔥
Big article out today by
@idontexistTore , but wait till you see how it ties into Dominion Voting and the source code and Jill Stein and Wisconsin and Colorado and Hillary Clinton and the nation and the world. 🧨
As best I can in one tweet, perhaps this is Part One, its deep people:
First, this all shows how utterly useless and clueless
@ScottPresler is, as well as much more about his father being deep state (others already published it).
Presler has done much to hurt the quest for honest elections. It has been proven now that he has NOT been helping conservatives win elections. I digress...but Presler is wrong about promoting mail in ballots, and he always avoids talking about the machines. I guess he is more interested in holes in one than winning the overall game.
“HUMA – and Tsinghua Stole Your Elections 军民融合 Style” by Tore Maras. [link below to her article]
Core Message of the Article: modern elections, especially in the United States, have been cryptographically captured by a globalized, dual-use academic and intelligence apparatus involving:
American mathematicians and institutions (like Harvard and HUMA),
Voting system technologists (notably Ronald Rivest),
Chinese military-aligned research entities (especially Tsinghua University),
And Western intelligence agencies (particularly the CIA).
Tore states that the trust model underpinning digital elections has been hijacked, not necessarily through overt fraud, but through cryptographic obfuscation, foreign intellectual exchange, and infiltration via elite student programs and academic collaboration.
Not in every single county in the USA, but enough.
Its a Cryptographic War, Not Cyberwar
Tore redefines “election interference” as a cryptographic control issue, not just hacking or ballot tampering.
She says the real battlefield is encryption, algorithmic trust, and black-box systems—a war of trust, not visible weapons.
Enter Ronald Rivest PhD computer science Stanford, now at MIT: Architect of the Control System. Remember his name.
Rivest was the co-creator of RSA encryption and voting systems like Scantegrity and ThreeBallot, he is painted as the most pivotal figure.
While his work appears to promote transparency, Tore claims it laid the groundwork for an opaque, cryptographer-dominated election infrastructure.
He served on the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), shaping federal voting standards post-HAVA.
Rivest testified in the Jill Stein case of 2016, in Wisconsin, about Dominion Voting. I have the documents of that case. There were 2 cases.
HUMA (Harvard Undergraduate Mathematics Association) – The Signal Before Power
Tore portrays it as a recruitment pipeline into the NSA, CIA, DARPA, MITRE, and private defense contractors.
She describes it as a grooming node for future technocrats who will control AI, encryption, surveillance, and elections. Also allegedly linked indirectly to China through academic exchanges with Tsinghua.
Noting I have Tore's affidavit (one of them) and never found anything in it to be incorrect).
Tsinghua University – CCP's Intellectual Warfare Arm:
Tsinghua is framed as the CCP’s version of MIT, fully integrated with military-civil fusion (军民融合) strategy.
It has allegedly absorbed U.S.-developed cryptographic protocols (like those from Rivest) and weaponized them for state control, particularly in voting systems.
Specific tools mentioned: zero-knowledge proofs, mixnets, homomorphic encryption.
Election Systems and Mixnets:
Systems like Dominion Voting’s “mixing phase” are cited as using cryptographic logic developed by American researchers but mirrored by Tsinghua for opaque control.
The claim is that no one—on the left or right—talks about Rivest or cryptographic underpinnings, which the author interprets as intentional deception or ignorance.
The CIA and Controlled Surrender:
Suggests that the CIA may have intentionally allowed Chinese adoption of American cryptographic tools, seeded with backdoors or kill switches.
Describes a potential “cryptographic nullification event” or sovereign reset, where the U.S. could pull the plug on China’s digital infrastructure if necessary.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) as the Holy Grail:
The article treats FHE as the true weapon of modern digital warfare—enabling encrypted computation without exposing data.
Rivest coined the idea (“privacy homomorphisms”); Gentry later operationalized it. Tore argues whoever controls FHE, controls the digital future—elections, finance, AI, and data privacy.
Academic Collaboration as Trojan Horse:
The danger is not espionage but naïve academic openness, allowing adversaries to absorb American intellectual innovations.
Examples cited: Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (TBSI), Harvard-Tsinghua AI papers, Scantegrity-like systems mirrored in China. Key People Identified:
Ronald L. Rivest -MIT professor, co-creator of RSA encryption. Creator of Scantegrity and ThreeBallot.
Chaired a federal committee shaping U.S. election systems.
Allegedly both a reformer and the architect of opaque, federally codified cryptographic voting systems.
Tore Maras (Author)
Claims insider knowledge from prior work as a contractor (PMC) in foreign elections (Afghanistan, Ukraine). Submitted an affidavit in 2020 with evidence regarding ballot stuffing, CIA involvement, and foreign ballot movement.
Tore helped flip the Ukraine elections for the corrupt USA federal govt back in 2014, as a sub-contractor for or part of the CIA.
TJ Schaffer: mentioned as someone who publicized a truck driver involved in ballot transport without presenting real evidence (DOT truck logs, GPS, etc.)
John Brennan: former CIA director, accused of spreading disinformation about Ukraine vote counting in 2014.
My words: Brennan will end up in prison, or a worse fate. Suzanne Spaulding, Victoria Nuland, Susan Rice not far behind.
How This Relates to Elections: global elections have been cryptographically captured, not just manipulated. Think Ukraine, think Philippines.
Tore claims a long-term infiltration or co-option of voting systems by adversarial actors (China, intelligence agencies, compromised insiders).
She warns of a shared intellectual DNA between U.S. voting system cryptography and Chinese systems now weaponized against democratic principles.
Election integrity has allegedly moved from transparent and local to opaque and cryptographically centralized, controlled by a “cryptographic class.”
The article implies two potential realities:
The U.S. retains hidden control over Chinese digital infrastructure via embedded logic flaws.
The CCP has gained full dominance, and U.S. politicians have been complicit or captured.
🧠 What the Author is Trying to Say
The battle for election integrity is not about voter fraud—it’s about who controls the cryptographic infrastructure.
The CIA and CCP are co-authors, not necessarily enemies. Cryptographers like Rivest created a mathematical language of trust, but it was co-opted to remove real transparency.
Elite academic programs like HUMA and exchanges with Tsinghua are feeding talent into a global machine of control, not democracy.
The public has been locked out of elections not by cheating at the ballot box, but by mathematical opacity and institutional capture.
📘 Final Thoughts
The piece is not conventional journalism, but a highly detailed insider-toned analysis that merges:
Cryptography, Academic policy, Military-civil fusion (军民融合), And geopolitical power structures.
It suggests a much deeper system of control than election day fraud, focusing on who owns the protocols, who defines trust, and who builds the math that governs modern democratic processes.
From Peter: this is why it is so difficult to get to the bottom of it all. But, 9:02pmEST happened, on Nov 5th 2024. 🙂 Listen to President Trump's speech the night before Jan 20th.
The voting systems run Rivest's algorithms, or they did if since replaced with new ones. I can confirm this, because of the Dominion source code from Colorado that I have and other verification. John Ratcliffe knew back in 2019, he did nothing. He is head of the CIA currently.
Rivest testified in Wisconsin court(s). The WI court(s) relied on that testimony to do the Jill Stein recount. And one of her attorneys? Current WI State Attorney General Josh Kaul, former Perkin Coies, former Hillary Clinton attorney.
Stein wanted a hand recount, but the Wis Election Commission wanted the machines to do it. Rivest stated a hand recount would be best. So did the 2nd professor who testified here in Wisconsin: Prof Halderman. Yep, he is in the court documents I have.
Didn't someone a week ago high up speak about computerized voting machines? Oh yeah, Tulsi Gabbard Director of National Intelligence. "Tulsi Gabbard wants paper ballots like Trump, found 'vulnerabilities' in electronic voting systems" on national TV while speaking directly to President Trump.
Still think this is still all a conspiracy theory about the voting machines?
@charliekirk11 @Bannons_WarRoom
The Wisconsin Election Commission, after an appeal court ruling, gave the Dominion source code to Jill Stein's campaign....and....Hillary Clinton got ahold of it.
Private companies owned by Wall St firms - and worse - run our elections, we can't see in their many back boxes. The strangest part ever to me is the election clerks' can't either.
The evidence of election theft is all over, but in particular in a certain SCIF President Trump has complete control of. Judgment day is coming for the election cheaters.
@ParikhClay @FSociety_1942 @DrazhaS @canncon @EmeraldRobinson @hoopes_leah @RegJoeShow @KevinMoncla @theprofsrecord @GAballots @EFFE4USA @KanekoaTheGreat @Rasmussen_Poll @honestpollster @RealAlexJones
Tore's article:
toresays.com/2025/04/21/huma…