10 points where Palestinian propaganda has gone too far and damaged its own credibility
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Often attributed to Abraham Lincoln
👉 Snow in Gaza
Those AI generated videos showing children crying in heavy snow were a mistake. People are not stupid. They have phones and can check. Gaza is a coastal city with a desert climate. There has never been anything close to a meter of snow there in recorded history. When people catch an obvious lie, they immediately ask themselves, if they’re lying about this, what else are they lying about.
👉 “Starvation”
You can’t use images of children with congenital or genetic conditions that make them appear severely emaciated and claim mass starvation, while at the same time showing healthy mothers sitting next to them. You can’t interview overweight Gazans about hunger. You can’t allow videos of markets full of food to circulate. These contradictions punch holes in the story.
👉 “The kids suffering”
If you stage fake food distribution scenes, bring children to cry on camera, film them screaming and begging, and claim there is nothing left, you can’t then show videos of the same kids smiling and laughing moments later. You can’t show photographers with professional equipment standing next to “starving” children. You can’t show a child crying while girls behind him are laughing. I’ve even seen a video of a boy crying and eating sand. Sand. This emotional overreach costs credibility.
👉 The billions
You need to hide this better. You can’t have leaders of the resistance sitting on generational wealth while your audience openly hates capitalism and wealth. Anyone can Google the net worth of the leaders of the Palestinian cause. More credibility lost.
👉 Beautiful before, or open air prison?
When you want to emphasize war damage, Gaza was beautiful before the war. When you want to argue that it didn’t start on October 7th, Gaza was an open air prison. These two narratives directly contradict each other. Inconsistency erodes trust.
👉 Hostages
You claimed to treat hostages well, then released videos of emaciated hostages digging what looked like their own graves. If credibility was the goal, you would show them healthy and strong. The staged goodie bags and forced affection scenes only made things worse. Are we really expected to believe this after those same “freedom fighters” murdered their families?
👉 The flotilla stunts
These were poorly executed PR stunts. Too big. Too theatrical. They lacked authenticity. One small flotilla, a few civilians, soldiers intercepting them, strong images for international media, and you’re done. Going big exposed it as performance.
👉 The $7,000 claim
You can’t seriously expect people to believe that every pro Israel voice online is paid $7,000 per post. This talking point insults the intelligence of the public.
👉 American podcasters
The podcasters cooperating with you are too aggressive and too openly anti Israel. The coordination is obvious. They need to offer something beyond anti Israel rhetoric. When it’s that transparent, people stop listening.
👉 Bots
Bot farms exist. In countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, one person can run, let’s say, 200 phones, managing fake profiles with a few friends each. These accounts flood pro Israel posts with the same memes, comments, and emojis. The problem is repetition. Khazars. Poland. Hasbara. Over and over. This frequency doesn’t build credibility, it destroys it.
There are more examples, but you get the point.
This campaign is overdosing on emotion at the expense of credibility. It may feel effective in the short term, but it damages the long term game. If I were you, I’d dial it down significantly to remain believable.
🇮🇱 The Nation of Israel Lives❤️