a monkey with a dremel tool and a dream

Joined May 2021
5,508 Photos and videos
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
Hot new Fuddblaster is out now! The gun no one knows how it works, where dozen of Youtubers have just made shit up about it! Don't miss it!
We are doing a video tonight, OK?
9
7
82
2,621
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
The AR-15 was designed and created specifically for the US military as a full auto assault rifle. Many AR-15s are assault rifles.
39
4
54
7,446
Show and tell time
I have an idea to make things right… For everyone. You show me. You can’t. You Can’t Do It. And have a great day.
16
19
397
16,631
I like gun
It’s Friday! Post gun!
1
126
3,197
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
"modern sporting rifle" is just a euphemism for "assault weapon"
41
9
146
7,181
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
Replying to @r_u_thinking
Josh Sugarman was 5 years old when gun reviewer Bob Zwirz used "assault weapon" to describe the Colt AR-15 Sporter in 1965. x.com/556timeline/status/178…

Replying to @ARtweaker
Ironically, the opening photo of Zwirz and his twenty round target was reused.
2
2
33
1,711
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
Reducing the combat effectiveness of a firearm simply to what projectile is fired is a gross oversimplification that betrays either ignorance or insincerity.
1
1
72
2,685
A semiauto AR15 is a far more capable firearm than the Thompson Submachinegun (which was "the" machinegun that the NFA meant to ban). The machinegun "dangerous" counterfactual is silly, especially in the era of FRTs and the like.
There's no good argument for why semiautos should be protected and machine guns shouldn't.
4
12
177
4,983
And to be clear, when I say "capable," I mean "really good at killing people quickly and easily," which is the entire point of self defense in the first place. There's no chivalry in bringing a knife to a gunfight. Self defense should be decisive and unfair.
3
2
81
1,244
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
The Army used semiauto AR-15s as designated marksman rifles throughout GWOT. They were built using M16A2/A4 lowers but had commercial semiauto match triggers installed: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squad_…
6
3
100
2,551
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
There are a hundred different things in the average person’s day that we teach children how to safely navigate around. Open flames, electrical outlets, stoves, cars, knives, and more. It is only with firearms, tools that exist in the millions across the United States, that there is such a concentrated effort to ensure children remain completely ignorant of basic safety around them.
It's not about safety.
14
73
594
12,907
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
It was added due to extensive Army testing some 7 years before we officially entered Vietnam. XM16E1 with the forward assist began production in early 1964, deployment to Vietnam was 1965.
1
3
45
4,636
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
you've clearly never read the manual you're talking about
6
6
175
7,030
Navi of Boomhandia retweeted
Replying to @NaviGoBoom
Forward assist hate is an excellent Midwit detector
4
36
2,785
There's documentary evidence of AR-15s in Vietnam jamming, with the bolt failing to fully close due to friction between the bolt carrier and upper. This is the exact jam the forward assist solves, yet people still choose to believe Stoner (who never used any rifle in combat).
Eugene talks about this. The FA in fact did not come from any soldier input, but instead brass that knew little to none about the rifle. Born from ignorance, essentially.
56
37
789
77,669
This jam was observed all the way back in 1958 when the Army first tested the AR-15. Much like with the AR-10 and FAL (both of which had forward assists added), sealed rifle systems can get dirty enough for the bolt to end up sluggish. You can't call a time-out to clean it.
3
2
204
6,198
The whole "the Army is so stupid about guns" thing is just idiotic. In particular about the AR15, where the Army identified practically every issue it had before 1963. Yet they were ignored, DOD forced adoption, then somehow people now blame the Army for the rifle's issues.
8
3
201
5,888
Perhaps Stoner would have been taken seriously if the AR-15 hadn't been so poorly designed initially. Perhaps people would have listened to him if he didn't insist that the AR-15 was perfect in 1959. Stoner got a lot more wrong than he did right with "his" AR-15.
Still amazing that Eugene Stoner outright told the Marine Corps all the problems of the M16A2, but got hand waved away because the target shooters who made the changes felt "it was their baby". He was right about every criticism too.
20
7
246
22,126
At any rate, the M16A2 was an excellent rifle and I suspect Stoner's ire with it stems mostly from the fact that other engineers continued to make something better out of a design that he started (and left in a rather incomplete state). That, and his royalties were running out.
3
74
2,231
Again, this isn't to say he wasn't brilliant. He certainly was. But he was a long way from faultless. And that's ok. But the veneration of Stoner like he's incapable of making bad decisions ends up obscuring (and contradicting) the history of the AR-15.
3
78
2,059