Return to Mainnet

Joined September 2020
1,187 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
5 Aug 2024
New 📌
21 Jun 2024
Replying to @loomdart
If Capo is on your side it's extremely late into the cycle and only an actual supercycle can save you He's done this for 2-3 cycles now It's his thing, you get most engagement at the extremes so you just gotta bull/bear post at those extremes and ignore all else
1
15
5,244
The $ZEC shillers really sent their followers to slaughter
1
1
33
Just received the same letter in my mailbox. Careful guys.
This is terrifying @Ledger. I just received a physical scam letter at my home address in Italy 🇮🇹 How the hell do scammers have access to the addresses of Ledger users? This goes way beyond phishing emails now. People’s safety is literally at risk.
96
Drift's hack was an insider job. Source: Instinct
1
7
238
Malaysian cuisine. Best in the world😉
Singaporean cuisine. Best in the world 😉
3
3
13
450
Yes, a money-launderer would love for the abundant onchain analysts to bring more eyes into this transaction. Income tax department and intelligence offices would be blindsided by the swap theatrics and ignore the origin of the 50m from a CEX with KYC.
nobody accidentally swaps $50M into a pool with $36K of liquidity lol. fresh wallet, $50.4M from Binance, zero slippage protection, routed through the jankiest Sushiswap path possible. and then an MEV bot just happens to flash borrow $29M from Morpho in the same block and pocket $9.9M? cmon. 0xngmi called this exact play a year ago - construct a deliberately terrible swap, let a friendly bot extract the value, dirty money comes out the other side as "legit MEV profit." $154K per AAVE isn't a fat finger. it's a laundering fee
1
1
6
307
The right way of thinking is that AML agencies are the stupid ones. x.com/waleswoosh/status/2032…

The problem with CT is that most people here are stupid, so they assume other people are stupid too. There is not a chance on God'd green earth that someone just accidentally swaps $50M USD into $36K USD. Very similar to the "fat-finger" NFT sales back in the day, when someone listed an NFT for 0.1 ETH instead of 100 ETH. Or a lot of the "wallet hacks". Most of these things are tax scams or money laundering. Some more, some less sophisticated
2
188
Bro went back to shitcoining 🥲
As real as they come ATBR4i19gcQ31Rfr7ymA2XvkCQEAkNFGBtVKTmdqpump $MACHI
157
DonAlt is secretly a Malaysian
Feb 16
Replying to @inversebrah
your mom is green (as a lil shit)
2
3
602
Vitalik had this in mind when he wrote this troll post
There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pre… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-c… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
1
2
160
"Wen crypto is down, be cockroach." - Bruce Lee, probably
3
126
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned
2
120
Pumpfun walked so XAG could run
52
Absolutely no one saw this coming /s
Jan 29
Some personal news: I’ll be stepping down as Director of Growth at the Monad Foundation. I've been working on Monad over the last 3 years. I’ve spent the last 9 years in crypto and been full time in the industry since joining the VC team at CMS in 2020. After fielding 1,000 startup pitches, I came across Monad and knew it was the opportunity of a lifetime. I went all in to help bring it to market. Building Monad from the ground up alongside Keone, James, Eunice, and the broader team has been the most rewarding experience of my career. We set out to build a decentralized, EVM-compatible L1 that truly scales. After years of work, it’s incredible to see that vision come to life. The tech is best-in-class and the ecosystem has 100 teams full of builders ready for the next wave of users. I’m proud we built this with integrity, no shortcuts, and a long-term mindset. Monad is now in a position to succeed and in great hands, with exciting initiatives coming in 2026 from both the Monad Foundation and Category Labs. I’ll be transitioning into an advisor role and will remain actively involved in supporting Monad and the broader ecosystem. Excited for what's ahead - updates to come.
2
140
Neubee retweeted
Jan 28
𐔌՞.Lib lief gib all expect nothang… ๓lp coded .՞𐦯 ⋆˚☆˖°⋆。° ✮˖ ࣪ ⊹⋆. apply now expect nothang ⋆˚☆˖°⋆。° ✮˖ ࣪ ⊹⋆. ╰┈➤ miladylineprint.xyz/whitelis… Ი𐑼 ⁴⁰⁴ only 尺etards allowed…⁴⁰⁴ ✌︎㋡ ✌︎㋡ share you 尺etard score in the cs⟢ •✌︎㋡
1,307
516
1,018
33,985
Neubee retweeted
Hehe CertiK wants a $2B valuation for its IPO. But somehow everyone forgets that the same CertiK launched token CTK on Binance Launchpool back in 2020. That token, unsurprisingly, speedran its way to near-zero… and then magically rebranded into @ShentuChain 😅 (almost all of the previous information was deleted). Hopefully the IPO valuation will be more grounded, because as an auditor CertiK is, objectively, pretty weak — there were plenty of incidents a few years ago. And the argument that “$2B is fair because they raised at that valuation at the peak cycle 4 years ago” doesn’t survive even the lightest scrutiny.
NEW: CERTIK EYES IPO AT $2 BILLION VALUATION AS IT TARGETS ‘FIRST PUBLIC WEB3 CYBERSECURITY’ LISTING - THEBLOCK SOURCE: theblock.co/post/386882/cert…
5
3
43
9,102
unbothered. moisturized. happy. in my lane. focused. flourishing. moemoe
✮ 🎀 萌萌 🎀 ✮ ANNOUNCEMENT ✮ 🎀 萌萌 🎀 ✮ moemoe.llc virtual desktop and NFT builder is online! WLs spots are open ⸜(◝ ⩊ ◜)⸝ 我永远爱你 ✰ More information below ↓↓↓
2
78
Neubee retweeted
Cool, I get to talk about Certik again. I've spent the last few years pretty aggressively calling this company out for egregious and malicious behavior. Certik IPOing is a massive net negative to our industry. Here's a refresher for you: 1. Certik black hat exploited kraken and washed funds through Tornado Cash (dlnews.com/articles/defi/cer…) 2. Certik was soliciting security vulnerability reports on their platform to then use to front run researchers and submit themselves on bounty platforms. (rekt.news/whitehat-grayarea & x.com/PopPunkOnChain/status/…) 3. Certik tried scrubbing all evidence that they were behind the above platform when called out. (x.com/PopPunkOnChain/status/…) 4. Certik gives platforms bogus security scores just because they don't work with Certik. This happened to my previous company. We were maliciously and manually added to their website with an unreasonably low security score on our protocol THAT WAS NOT EVEN RELEASED YET. It was only removed after I threatened them with a defamation lawsuit. (x.com/PopPunkOnChain/status/…) This is just a SMALL handful of things I was able to quickly pull up. They're a horrible company and an embarrassment to blockchain security and our industry as a whole.
NEW: CERTIK EYES IPO AT $2 BILLION VALUATION AS IT TARGETS ‘FIRST PUBLIC WEB3 CYBERSECURITY’ LISTING - THEBLOCK SOURCE: theblock.co/post/386882/cert…
84
61
774
104,493
Some of you will learn a very painful lesson
6 Different Vaults can currently earn you over 400% APR in iBGT on Infrared, and some of them even have actual liquidity in the underlying too 😅
3
3
280
i got life sentence 😭💀 moving into @Jaileddotfun soon
2
54
It's almost like the founder of Ethos and Publius have negative IQ or something
1
68