🚨 The
$SIGNALS Playbook: Why Tonight's ICMM Sale Is a Red Flag
BREAKING:
@BaseICCM presale tonight (21:30 CET) despite Signals disaster 3 days ago. Let me show you the pattern.
2025: Building Trust
@districtxyz launched several projects.
@Nemesisdottraderaise 105 ETH and added 15 ETH LP.
@TitaniumFi raised 50 ETH, added 25 ETH LP, and gave investors 2x.
@houseproto did the same - 50 ETH raise, 20 ETH LP, 2x gains.
Same team every time:
@rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz
Community loved it. "These guys deliver." Trust was maximum.
Jan 19: The Exit
$SIGNALS launches as TheAgency's "flagship product." 130K users, all the winners as partners. 50 ETH raised in HOURS.
Then things got weird. They posted the Uniswap trading link BEFORE the raise even finished. People saw it and bought thinking it's live. Then that tweet disappeared. Chart dumped -69% in 24 hours. People couldn't sell - liquidity too thin.
On-chain shows only 10 ETH in the LP. Wait - Titanium got 25 ETH, House got 20 ETH, even Nemesis got 15 ETH. Why did the "flagship" get only 10?
50 ETH raised minus 10 ETH LP = where's the other 40 ETH?
The Response
Community exploded with questions.
@rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz @enterSIGNALS response? Complete silence. Not even "we're looking into it." Just crickets 🦗
Tonight
@BaseICCM presale launches. Same launchpad, same advisor network. No Signals resolution, no answers, just the next launch.
So let me ask: Why did you post the Uniswap link early then delete it? Why give Signals 10 ETH LP when you did 20-25 ETH for others? Where's the 40 ETH? And why launch ICMM 3 days later with zero Signals answers?
The pattern is clear: Build trust → Execute exit → Move to next
To
@BaseICCM @districtxyz @TheAgencyVC:
You proved you CAN execute properly with Titanium and House. But your "flagship" got half the LP and a premature trading link that got deleted? That's not incompetence. That's intentional.
Cancel tonight. Fix Signals first - add proper LP like you did before, explain the deleted tweet, show where 40 ETH went. THEN launch ICMM. Your backers (a16z, Initialized) invested in transparency. Is this it?
To the community:
They know how to do this right. They proved it 3 times. They chose NOT to for Signals. Now they're asking for more ETH 72 hours later?
If you're in ICMM WL - would you trust someone who took your money, went silent, then asked for more?
RT if Signals needs fixing before any new launch.
cc:
@rskagy @TheAgencyVC @districtxyz @BaseICCM @enterSIGNALS
⏰ 8 hours. Community is watching.
#SIGNALS #ICMM #Base #CryptoAlert