The first trillionaire in human history - Elon Musk - Born in South Africa - Bullied relentlessly as a kid - Immigrated to North America - Arrived with a backpack and a dream - Built Zip2 with his brother - Sold it 4 years later for $300 million - Co-founded PayPal with the profits - Revolutionised digital payments - Sold PayPal to eBay for $1.5 billion - Bet everything on Tesla and SpaceX - Got mocked for electric cars - Got laughed at for reusable rockets - Nearly went bankrupt in 2008 - Kept building anyway - Turned Tesla into the world’s most valuable automaker - Made EVs mainstream and transformed the automotive industry - Made reusable rockets a reality - Reduced the cost of reaching space by 95% - Sparked the modern commercial space race - Built Starlink and connected millions around the world to high-speed internet - Turned SpaceX into the most valuable private company in history - Bought Twitter for $44 billion - The world said he overpaid - He was called reckless, stupid & crazy - Advertisers fled, media declared it dead - Critics called it the worst acquisition in tech history - Renamed it 𝕏 - Rebuilt the platform anyway - Turned it into one of the most influential platforms on Earth - Launched xAI and accelerated the global AI race - Sent astronauts to space - Is trying to get humans to mars - Created millions of jobs - Generated hundreds of billions in value - Inspired an entire generation of builders Before: - Failed repeatedly - Worked insane hours - Slept in factories and offices - Got bullied, laughed at and mocked - Constantly told “it’s impossible” - Kept building anyway - Made it possible Today: - Richest person on Earth - First trillionaire in human history - Largest IPO in history $1.77 trillion Most people quit when the world laughs at them. Elon Musk built the future instead. Love him or hate him… Nobody has changed more industries in a single lifetime. Payments. Cars. Energy. Space. Social Media. Communications. AI. History won’t remember the people who said it couldn’t be done. It will remember the people who did it anyway. Congratulations Elon. The first trillionaire. 🚀

New Study Reveals Even Low Alcohol Intake Increases Risk of Cancer, Heart Disease, and Early Death—Findings Absent from Current Dietary Guidelines | ScienMag A groundbreaking study recently published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs has delivered a sobering reassessment of what society typically considers “moderate” drinking. Conducted under the auspices of Rutgers University with contributions from leading researchers in Canada and the United States, this exhaustive analysis challenges long-standing beliefs about the safety and potential benefits of alcohol consumption. By synthesizing data from over 7,200 scientific articles on alcohol-related health outcomes, the researchers reveal a stark reality: even consumption levels once deemed moderate or low can significantly increase the risk of mortality and chronic disease. The study, titled the Alcohol Intake and Health Study, was commissioned by the U.S. federal government to provide clear, evidence-based guidance for the 2025–2030 U.S. Dietary Guidelines. Unlike previous dietary recommendations, which advised men to limit themselves to two alcoholic drinks per day and women to one, the new findings indicate that such thresholds might considerably understate the associated health risks. In fact, researchers estimate that consuming an average of 14 alcoholic drinks per week correlates with a 1 in 25 mortality risk attributed directly to alcohol-related causes, a sobering statistic that calls for urgent reconsideration of acceptable drinking limits. Dr. Kevin Shield, the study’s lead author and an associate professor at the University of Toronto, underscores an unsettling paradigm: “Even low levels of alcohol use come with health risks. And that risk continues to increase the more someone drinks.” His statement encapsulates the primary takeaway of the study, emphasizing the cumulative and progressive nature of alcohol’s harm to human health. The research not only quantifies the risks but also dissects the broad spectrum of alcohol-induced illnesses, ranging from cancers to cardiovascular diseases and acute injuries. A meticulous medical review of thousands of studies allowed the team to categorize health conditions causally linked to alcohol consumption. These conditions include but are not limited to esophageal, oral, and breast cancers, various cardiovascular diseases, as well as liver conditions and injury-related outcomes. By applying these risk coefficients to large-scale national health datasets, the researchers employed sophisticated statistical modeling to estimate the long-term impacts of varying levels of alcohol intake across populations. One of the most striking revelations of this endeavor is the lack of evidence supporting the commonly held belief that alcohol offers protective health benefits. Earlier observational studies often suggested that moderate drinking could reduce risks of ischemic heart disease and stroke. However, when situating such findings within the entire array of alcohol-related health consequences, Shield et al. found that these minimal protective effects are overwhelmed by the increased risks imposed by cancer and other chronic diseases even at seven drinks per week — a threshold significantly lower than previously recommended consumption limits. Timothy Naimi, an adjunct professor at Boston University and co-author of the study, elaborates on the social and scientific mismatch that has obscured public health messaging: “While society has often framed two drinks per day as socially moderate and relatively safe, our data reveal this level of consumption is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of premature death due to alcohol.” This discrepancy highlights the chasm between cultural acceptance and scientific evidence, emphasizing the need for updated guidelines that more accurately reflect health consequences. Importantly, the study underscores that health outcomes from alcohol consumption are not uniform across individuals. Factors such as genetics, lifestyle, and drinking patterns play crucial roles in modulating individual risk. Nevertheless, the aggregated national-level data provide an indispensable benchmark for informing public health policy and personal decision-making. This quantitative framework, absent in current dietary guidelines, offers clarity on the gradient of risk that escalates with increasing alcohol intake. Moreover, the researchers acknowledge that ongoing scientific inquiry is essential to fully characterize alcohol’s impact on diseases not yet conclusively linked to consumption, such as pancreatic cancer. As the scientific landscape evolves, updated risk assessments will be necessary to refine and potentially lower safe drinking thresholds. Shield points out that uncovering these dimensions remains a vital future research frontier to better understand alcohol’s comprehensive health effects. The significance of this study extends beyond its data and conclusions, touching on the political and policy environment that driven alcohol guidelines. In a contemporaneous editorial, Robert M. Vincent, formerly of the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, critiques the sidelining of this research in policy discussions despite its explicit purpose to inform national guidance. This commentary underscores the tension between scientific evidence and regulatory frameworks, highlighting challenges in translating rigorous research into actionable public health recommendations. Ultimately, the Alcohol Intake and Health Study provides a vital recalibration of alcohol-related health risks, underscoring that no level of alcohol consumption can be considered completely safe. This study dismantles myths of protective effects and offers an evidence-based threshold to help individuals make informed choices. It also reinvigorates discussions on alcohol regulation and public health messaging, advocating for transparency and precision in communicating risks to the public. As alcohol remains a pervasive and socially entrenched substance worldwide, these findings carry profound implications for global health, disease prevention, and education. They challenge policymakers, health professionals, and society at large to reassess cultural norms around drinking and prioritize evidence-driven strategies to mitigate alcohol-related harm. This research is a landmark in addiction and public health sciences, signaling that the risks associated with alcohol intake are both real and quantifiable, calling for urgent public awareness and reconsideration of what constitutes “moderate” consumption in light of longevity and chronic disease prevention. Read more: scienmag.com/new-study-revea…

The LA Election Steal | Daniel Greenfield The most incredibly impossible election ever In 2022, with over $100 million spent on a heavily contested mayoral election in Los Angeles, 646,058 votes were cast in the first round of voting In 2026, with hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on an election most people were ignoring, the current totals for the first round is at a staggering 723,472 votes. And the election isn’t even done yet. There had been suspicions about an influx of late arriving ballots that put Karen Bass over the top in 2022 and allowed Los Angeles to burn considering that primary turnout in the previous mayoral elections in 2017 and 2013 had been around 400,000. 2026 looks to double that. It was already pretty impressive when the voter totals rose around 50% in 2022 even as the population increased by less than 3%, but in a truly miraculous event, they’re now about to rise 100% even as the population shrank and even during expected low voter turnout. All the reporting indicated low early voting in the LA area only to somehow achieve an unprecedented record turnout on behalf of Mayor Karen Bass who, after letting parts of the city burn and then lying about it, enjoyed a 56% unfavorable rating and only a 31% approval rating. In 2022, Bass had gotten 278,511 votes in the primary. Now, after burning down the city and having the approval rating of a rotten fish, she’s set to blow past her 2022 primary totals. How does a politician with a 31% approval rating turn out more voters than she did in 2022? This was already pretty amazing, but then the miraculous really happened when Councilwoman. Nithya Raman, who spent less time in the city than I did, who had come in third place on Election Day and lost her own district, somehow surged and won majorities of late ballot drops. Raman began by picking up 40% of late arriving ballots. Sure, we’ve always been told that Democrats benefit from late-arriving ballots because they just can’t be bothered to vote in person or on time, but this was a unique example of the late-arriving ballots benefiting the losing Dem in such a strategic way as to lock out Spencer Pratt: the non-establishment candidate. The leftist councilwoman doubled her polling numbers in late arriving ballots, she performed better with those late arriving ballots than the Democrat front runner, and outperformed Pratt even while Bass performed just well enough to loosely keep her roughly 35% front slot. That’s not the kind of outcome that happens organically in a normal election. The ‘surge’ of late-arriving ballots, which usually boosts the Democrat front runner, instead boosted the Democrat third runner, while making the general election a battle between two leftist Democrats, one of whom supported Communist Cuba, and an even more radical newcomer. More significantly it shuts down Pratt’s critiques of the same broken system. LA’s last mayoral election in 2022 had a similar enough twist with Rick Caruso, a successful developer, winning both the primary and the general election on Election Day, before more ‘late arriving ballots’ conveniently put Bass over the top. Caruso went from winning the primary by 5% to losing it by 7% once those ‘late arriving ballots’ showed up. Then he won the general 51% to 49% only to lose it from those same ballots. While Bass lost on Election Day, taking in less than 49%, she picked up around 60% of every subsequent late arriving ballot drop. That was suspicious enough, especially with turnout somehow up around 50%, but we were told that late-arriving ballots (naturally) favor Democrats, but how does one explain turnout rising by 100% and the late-arriving ballots favoring not just Democrats, but one specific Democrat. Why would late-arriving ballots behave so differently from all the previous votes that had been cast? Some have tried to find excuses. They’ve pointed to the one poll that favored Raman. They’ve claimed that she did better with younger voters who voted late. They’ve argued that Democrats were voting ‘strategically’ to box out Pratt. But none of those excuses makes sense. Polls can be wrong, but the poll numbers were reasonably predictive. There was no sign of a surge for Raman anywhere, especially online, where younger voters are more active and reactive. And while the party establishment may have strategic intentions, voters do not cast their ballots ‘strategically’ by voting for a losing candidate on the theory that she would end up in second place out of fear that the candidate they really support might end up losing the election. The only people who can direct votes ‘strategically’ are the ones who command not individual ballots, but tens of thousands of them, and that is what happened in the mayoral election. Late voter dumps consisting of harvested ballots and other dubious schemes can be used to make a mockery of elections and representative government, but when ballots are added in such numbers, they distort the overall totals leading to absurdities like voter turnout continuing to increase for Democrat candidates even as the public grows less enthused with them. Electing Bass in 2022 required faking a massive turnout surge and 2026 has an even bigger surge. As public discontent with the political machine grows, increasingly bigger surges will have to be faked until there will be more voters than there are people living in Los Angeles. And as the city’s population shows signs of shrinking due to miserable mismanagement by the same political machine rigging elections, that is becoming a very realistic prospect. Meanwhile with the mayoral race now a contest between two leftists, it will be interesting to see what the turnout numbers for the general look like, and whether one or both sides will perform ballot dumps to change the outcome, and that potential civil war between election riggers will tell us a good deal about who’s rigging elections and how they’re going about doing it. The lack of any meaningful election integrity means that worthless ballots with no valid signatures can be dumped and counted as long as they put the right people over the top. The ballot dumps for Raman locked out Pratt, but if the Left is serious about replacing Bass with Raman the following months will see an ugly showdown between the city’s top political crooks. And that may be the only way the machine exposes itself. danielgreenfield.org/p/the-l…

At 17, Dawn Loggins came home from a summer program and discovered her family was gone. No note. No warning. No home. Months later, she received an acceptance letter from Harvard. This is her story. Dawn grew up in rural North Carolina in a house without electricity or running water. When the family needed water, she and her brother walked to a public park and filled jugs from the bathroom faucets. Showers were rare. Classmates called her dirty. She kept showing up to school. Her parents moved constantly. Eviction after eviction. New town. New school. By age 17, Dawn had attended four different high schools and missed nearly an entire year of education. Most students would have fallen behind. Dawn excelled. When she arrived at Burns High School in 2010, guidance counselor Robyn Putnam immediately saw something special. Dawn enrolled in makeup courses. Studied before sunset because there were no lights at home. Took AP classes. Earned straight A's. Joined clubs. Then led them. Photography Club. Rock Climbing Club. Spanish Club. President of all three. That summer she earned a place at the prestigious Governor's School of North Carolina. Teachers helped buy her clothes. Putnam drove her 200 miles to the program. Nobody knew where Dawn would be living when it ended. The concern turned out to be justified. Near the end of the program, Dawn tried calling home. The number was disconnected. When she returned, the house was empty. Her parents had moved away. She was 17 years old. Homeless. Alone. Most people would have stopped there. Dawn didn't. She couch-surfed. Carried toiletries in her backpack because she never knew where her next shower would come from. And every morning at 6 a.m., she went to work. As a school custodian. She swept hallways. Cleaned classrooms. Scrubbed desks. Then sat down and earned straight A's. By graduation year, she had: • Straight A grades • AP courses • Leadership roles in three clubs • A part-time job before school every morning Then a teacher made one suggestion: Apply to Harvard. Dawn laughed. Then thought: "Why not?" She became the first student in Burns High School history to apply. Months later, an envelope arrived. Harvard College. Accepted. Full tuition. Full room and board. Everything covered. On graduation day in 2012, when her name was announced, the entire gymnasium stood and applauded. Teachers cried. Students cheered. The girl who cleaned their hallways before sunrise was heading to Harvard. When asked about her parents, Dawn didn't speak with anger. She simply said: "I love my parents. I disagree with the choices they've made." Then she added something even more powerful: "If I had not had those experiences, I wouldn't be such a strong-willed or determined person." Burns High School had over 1,000 students. Dawn Loggins became the first ever accepted to Harvard. Proof that the circumstances you're born into are not the same thing as the future you're capable of building.

The year is 1949. The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain. The year is 1956. Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over. The year is 1966. A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots. The year is 1979. Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005. The year is 1985. Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning. The year is 1992. There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with. So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now. Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one. It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.

DUTCH COURT MOVES FORWARD: COVID JABS OFFICIALLY LABELED BIOWEAPONS in Historic Case Against Bill Gates & Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla! For the FIRST TIME EVER, a Dutch court has heard sworn evidence that the mRNA “vaccines” are **military bioweapons** — not medicine. The late Professor Francis Boyle — the world’s top bioweapons expert who literally **drafted the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act** — was set to testify against Gates, Bourla and the rest of the “Architects of the Great Reset.” In his damning affidavit, Boyle called the COVID injections “franken-shots” — synthetic biological weapons packed with illegal gain-of-function spike proteins and Pentagon/DARPA nanotechnology delivery systems designed to cause massive injury and death. Then, just days after agreeing to testify under oath in this very case… Professor Boyle was found dead. Coincidence? Or convenient silencing of the one man who could legally define these shots as bioweapons under international law? His final testimony is now **court evidence.** Plaintiffs injured (and one now dead) from the jabs are suing Gates, Bourla, former Dutch PM Mark Rutte and others for **crimes against humanity** under the Rome Statute. The court has ordered Gates and Bourla to appear and answer for this. NEXT COURT DATE: OCTOBER 22, 2026. **WHAT WAS CALLED “CONSPIRACY THEORY” IS NOW OFFICIAL COURT EVIDENCE.** This is Nuremberg 2.0 unfolding in real time. The Great Reset is crumbling. The architects are being dragged into the light.

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Tens of thousands of Spencer Pratt voters are now receiving rejection letters from the county clerk saying that their ballots were not counted due to signature irregularities. Yet, Governor Gavin Newsom just passed legislation that would make it illegal for anyone conducting oversight, to contest signatures that they deemed fraudulent. Democrats allow ballots to be signed with an X, a -, or a 🙂 to pass and count, but all of a sudden, only Republican signatures are being flagged for irregularities, rejected, and not counted. 🤔 One of these California Republican voters said that his signature has been on file for over 20 years and there has never been an issue until he voted for Spencer Pratt. Nithya Ramen has beaten Spencer Pratt by less than 3000 votes. There are at least 18,000 Pratt voters who received this letter saying their votes were rejected.

Sheryl. Your article exemplifies the biased reporting we have come to expect from you and @nytimes. It was unfair, inimical, and inaccurate. All one needs to refute your argument is to glance at my publicly available calendar and to review my unprecedented list of accomplishments on a wide range of issues, all of which I drove. You evidently never undertook these foundational due diligences. Why let facts obscure a good story? You fault me for missing a couple of monthly counselor meetings. However, I meet one-on-one with my counselors every day to decide policy and strategy. We schedule the monthly meetings to give the divisions a chance to keep each other informed about HHS-wide policies with which I’m already intimately familiar. Had you read my calendar, you would have seen that I have back-to-back meetings all day, every day, with both career and political staff, with my counselors and with outside stakeholders, interspersed with press conferences and other policy announcements. I am knowledgeable and active on every issue in every division of my department, and I always make the final decisions. I meet with the principals at FDA, NIH, CDC, and my senior counselor every morning, something, I’m told, is unprecedented in HHS history. I try to get out of the office between 4:30 and 6:00 PM, so that I can spend three hours, in quiet, responding to emails. I normally work until 11 PM every night, mostly on phone calls to staff. In order to prove your preconceived case for my disengagement, you quote anonymous employees, some of whom I fired or who quit to avoid being fired. You also deceptively quote HHS employees without identifying whether they were among those I fired, thereby depriving your readers of the opportunity to make an independent judgment about their credibility. I came into this job to change the culture of a broken agency that has presided over the worst decline in public health in American history. Of course I fired people—lots of them! It's an easy task for even the laziest journalist, to comb that flotsam and jetsam for malevolence toward the Trump administration. And of course, this species of journalist will always be able to find disgruntled individuals among the 70,000 employees of the Department from whom to cherry pick "facts" to flesh out a preordained hit piece. All that is required for this brand of journalism is the ethical elasticity that you seem to have in spades. You had a preconceived thesis, and you set out to prove it. This is a widely accepted technique in journalism today, but I grew up in an era when it would not have been tolerated by the New York Times. Ultimately, God puts us all on this earth to search for existential truths. I've tried to instill this mission at HHS by implementing gold standard research to end the regime of politicized science that COVID exposed to the American public. There was a time that journalists were proud to be the fearless and uncompromising champions of truth. Standards have devolved, and journalism is dead. The Times now employs propagandists. Your capitulation to partisanship further compounds your journalistic challenges; since we all are aware of your predictable bias, we at HHS are unwilling to talk to you about the topics that are important. The fact that you have minimal access to decision makers leaves you covering trivia and relying on your own capacity for invention. Btw. When I took this job, the building was empty. About 90% of the employees were not coming to work. I changed that, but your newspaper never covers my reforms. Nor did you cover the fact that my predecessor almost never showed up for work here during his four years in office. When we came in, there were still artifacts from the first Trump administration in many of our office drawers because no one showed up for work during the Biden years. Just as Rochelle Walensky spent her entire term as CDC Director in Cambridge, Xavier Becerra reportedly spent most of his term as HHS Secretary in California. (I live in California, but I’ve only been there once in fifteen months). His only notable accomplishments here were losing 300,000 children, referred to HHS for custody and care, to human traffickers and drug runners, encouraging transgender surgeries, and disabling the entire program-integrity apparatus, allowing hundreds of billions of dollars of theft from my agency. I have set out to find the children Becerra lost. He is now the front-runner for the governor of California. These are not invented stories; they are genuine scandals that the Times will never cover, presumably, because the malefactors are Democrats. Finally, you criticize me for spending time with the Indian tribes in Alaska. I consider that part of my job. I run the Indian Health Services, and I’ve had unprecedented success in transforming IHS from a backwater to a top priority for this department. I’ve made more trips to Indian country and to Indian health clinics and hospitals than any HHS secretary in history, and I’ve brought Indians into high positions on the sixth floor for the first time in agency history. This is another success story that the Times will never cover.

BOMBSHELL report might FINALLY put Anthony Fauci behind bars A new Senate report from @RonJohnsonWI EXPOSES how Biden officials COVERED UP flaws in the COVID-19 vaccine. "This is the biggest government scandal in my lifetime because Americans across the globe deserve accurate information. These folks were supposed to be looking for my new safety signals to warn doctors. At least not the public. Instead, they were shown the safety signals. They denied them. They ignored them. They lied to the American public." Johnson tells @LarryOConnor that this should OUTRAGE every American. "Can you imagine being a parent who listened to Peter Marks and Anthony Fauci and President Biden, you know, say this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated? These injections are safe and effective. The adverse events are rare and mild. And so you listen to all that. And then you had your child vaccinated because you didn't want that child to get COVID and then pass it on to their grandparent and kill a grandparent because that's what they're being told." "But now we know that as of March 1st, 2021, Peter Marks, who heads up the division, an FDA that approves vaccines and is supposed to surveil, say, safety systems, was warned that the algorithm they used to analyze various vaccine adverse event reporting systems." "That algorithm was going to mask the safety signals because he had two similar injections, Moderna and Pfizer, and you compare one to the other, equally safe, equally dangerous. And so those things are masked. Twenty-six days later, using an up-to-date algorithm, they were showing 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell's palsy, and different types of strokes." "Dr. Szarfman, she's the data mining expert, was warning them to continue to do data runs, which showed more very serious adverse events, and they blew her off. They told her to cease and desist." "Let me add, the CDC used a different technique for data mining and called proportional reporting ratio and a bunch of us in 2022 were asking to see that data, the results of it. Finally, they released through the Epoch Times, showing that the PRR was showing all kinds of safety signals, and they just blew it off. And what they told us all this is too noisy. It's simply not working. We're going to use the FDA's empirical Bayesian data mining, that is the algorithm, that is the system that they knew was hiding and masking safety signals." In light of this report, Johnson recognized that Biden-era officials like Peter Marks and Anthony Fauci would demand definitive proof that these maskings resulted in vaccine deaths and injuries. "You can always say, well, people die. You know, people have heart attacks, people have strokes. You can't prove the vaccine caused this. I’ll give you one proof: 39,000 deaths are right now reported worldwide on the VAERS system, 39,000. 24% of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within 1 or 2 days. I know this doesn't prove causation. That's a correlation that's been concerning to me since, oh, I don't know about March, April 2021, when I started looking at VAERS."

DISTURBING: Canada is now on the verge of classifying some Bible passages as “hate speech.” A new law just passed, and if sharing your faith offends the wrong person, you could face up to 2 years in prison. Canadian politicians voted to strip away a good-faith religious text protection that existed in law. This means that anything said by a Christian—whether in a church service, while reading the Bible, sharing their faith on YouTube, or even in a private conversation—could be scrutinized, investigated, and potentially punished if some cog in the machine decides it is hateful. They haven’t defined which Bible passages could be targeted. But even if they did, this is the government inserting itself into matters of faith and potentially paving the way for Christianity to be treated as a criminal offense. That’s where this is headed. Joining us to discuss is citizen journalist and content creator Tajana Cekic (@TruthSeek01011).

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary

Nithya Raman overtakes Spencer Pratt — but watch out | CA Post Editorial Board, New York Post Socialist Nithya Raman might be familiar with a phrase widely misattributed to Joseph Stalin: “It’s not the people who vote that count, it’s the people who count the votes.” Not much voting went on in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, so Stalin probably didn’t say that. But the point about counting the vote stands. On Sunday evening, Raman overtook challenger Spencer Pratt for second place in the race for LA mayor. The trend seems likely to continue. We would like to report the ballots counted thus far as a percentage of the total cast, but unfortunately, we cannot: ballots are still being accepted, if they were postmarked by June 2. So no one knows exactly how many ballots there are, because the number keeps growing. They aren’t being counted at the precinct level, but in a massive, centralized counting facility. And, of course, they have to get there, first. There’s no evidence of fraud. Just proof of a massively flawed design. There’s not one other democracy in the world that runs this way. Nor is there another state within the US that does. But California stands by its system. And why wouldn’t it? Everything about it suits incumbents just fine. Remember that in 2022, voters who wanted to recall unpopular LA County District Attorney George Gascón handed in 26% more than the required number of signatures. County officials then reported that 27% of the signatures were invalid — just enough to disqualify the recall. What a coincidence. And observers weren’t allowed to watch the signature verification process. Surely another coincidence. In the end, Gascón lost his re-election campaign in a landslide, to Nathan Hochman. Ultimately, the will of the people prevailed. But that margin was so huge — almost 20 points — that there was no room for doubt. In a close election, we cannot have a process that works this way. The people defending the system today — because they like the result — will one day be on the receiving end. Especially if it is a fight among Democrats, who know all the tricks. Raman, despite being seven points behind on June 2, has now made up that seemingly insurmountable margin. If she qualifies for the general election, congratulations and good luck. One word of advice: remember that there are hundreds of thousands of Pratt voters. They could be the swing voters in this election. Mock their disappointment at your political peril. nypost.com/2026/06/07/opinio…

CALIFRAUDIA? Steve Hilton Says Whistleblower Claims of Separate Post Office “Buckets” for Ballots Arriving After Election Day — Handwritten Dates Reportedly Accepted | Jim Hᴏft, The Gateway Pundit California gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton unloaded on the Golden State’s election system during an appearance on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle this week, describing California’s vote-counting process as “insane” and alleging that a whistleblower exposed a troubling ballot-handling scheme inside a U.S. Post Office after a previous election. Hilton joined host Laura Ingraham as outrage continues to grow over California’s notoriously slow vote-counting process. As of election night, millions of ballots remained uncounted, with state officials warning that final results could take days—or even weeks—to be certified. Hilton revealed that during a previous election cycle, a courageous post office whistleblower reached out to him with a terrifying account of blatant, organized corruption happening right under the noses of voters. According to the whistleblower, postal workers were instructed to sort mail-in ballots into separate “buckets” after Election Day had already concluded. Even worse, supervisor instructions completely obliterated the rule of law regarding postmarks. Steve Hilton: “It’s insane. This election system that they’ve created here is just another monument to their uselessness, another version of high-speed rail. And just to really underline the point that you made about the corruption, I remember last time around, during the last elections we had here, I had a whistleblower who contacted me from a post office. They described how there were different buckets they were supposed to put the ballots in after they came in after Election Day, and they were explicitly told that it didn’t just have to be a postmark that was on or before Election Day that qualified. If the date was handwritten, that would be okay as well. And you think, what? It’s just unbelievable. And, of course, that’s why so many people don’t believe the results. It undermines confidence. So I completely agree with you. There is a case out of Mississippi that I think might help with this, that’s before the Supreme Court. But the whole thing is insane. I mean, the fact that you’re sending out mail ballots to every single person on a voting roll that is wildly inaccurate, even though it’s being cleaned up because the Trump Justice Department, thankfully, is bringing lawsuits against California to clean up the voter rolls. There’s still a long way to go there. The whole thing is a joke, just like pretty much everything else they try to do here.” As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, California’s election system is a national disgrace built for fraud and opacity: In February 2026, investigative reporter Nick Shirley traveled across the state and exposed how California’s lack of voter ID, mass unsolicited mail ballots, ballot harvesting, and “curing” combine with wildly inaccurate voter rolls to make fraud almost inevitable in the one-party state. Shirley found dead people on the rolls, a dog registered to vote, voters listed at 125 years old, and dozens of registrations tied to single addresses like a mail store. Earlier reporting detailed how Los Angeles County alone had to scrub over a million ineligible voters from bloated rolls, and how non-citizens and even foreign nationals have ended up on the rolls and received mail ballots. President Trump sounded the alarm on California on Thursday, telling reporters, “They’re rigging the election,” as counting continues across the state and key races for California governor and Los Angeles mayor remain undecided. Trump announced an investigation had been launched by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in LA. thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06…

According to artificial intelligence, the statistical probability of Spencer Pratt getting 0 out of 24,000 votes in last nights late night Los Angeles ballot drop is “1 in trillions” California Democrats are rigging the election

Just a reminder that the ONLY Republican running for Mecklenburg County (Charlotte NC) District 1 dropped out of the race... ...BECAUSE NOT A SINGLE PERSON WAS ARRESTED FOR FIRING SHOTS AT HIS HOME WHILE HIS WIFE AND KIDS WERE INSIDE!!!!! Local police SPECIFICALLY CONFIRMED the attack was targeted at Aaron Marin. Bullet holes can be seen in trees, cars, mailbox, and his kid's basketball hoop. Marin's ENTIRE FAMILY was forced to leave their home and Aaron says they live in, "constant fear." He says his kids no longer even feel safe to play outside and they are moving now. CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN WHY ZERO MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLET COVERED THIS??????!!!!!! REPUBLICANS ARE LITERALLY BEING SHOT AT AND THERE IS SILENCE FROM THE MEDIA!!!!!! WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?!!!!!!

🚨 ONE YEAR ON: DEION SANDERS’ “TURBO CANCER” FORCED TOTAL BLADDER REMOVAL — NOW BATTLING BLOOD CLOTS AGAIN IN 2026! Deion Sanders — Hall of Famer, Coach Prime, father — had his entire bladder ripped out in May 2025 and replaced with a section of his small intestine after doctors found an aggressive tumor. ZERO family history of bladder cancer. But he DID push the COVID shots… took multiple doses… and has suffered recurring blood clots ever since (toes amputated, another procedure just weeks ago in April 2026).Dr. Peter McCullough called it exactly what it is: turbo cancer — the explosive, post-mRNA form exploding across the country. Thousands of studies link these shots to aggressive cancers, spike protein damage, and SV40-driven tumors. His doctors declared him “cured” last summer… but still refuse to test the tumor for vaccine mRNA or spike. This isn’t coincidence. This is the pattern we’ve seen over and over. Coach Prime is back on the sidelines fighting — but the truth about what caused this must come out. Pray for Deion and his family. Demand the testing. Demand accountability.The shots were never “safe and effective.” They’re still destroying lives in 2026. @DeionSanders @P_McCulloughMD

🚨 BREAKING OVERNIGHT: The SAVE America Act GOT 50 VOTES thanks to Sen. Susan Collins voting in favor of Mike Lee's amendment THEY JUST PROVED IT CAN GET 51 VOTES, with JD Vance as a tie-breaker! This version of the bill still contains voter ID and proof of citizenship 🔥 But it needed 60. SO NO MORE EXCUSES! Nuke the filibuster. Lee says this is the HOUSE-passed version of SAVE America, which still secures our elections to a VERY strong degree.

Dear @WhiteHouse, my name is Rodney Smith Jr., founder of Raising Men & Women Lawn Care Service in Huntsville, Alabama. Through our 50 Yard Challenge, over 6,000 kids across the country have signed up to mow free lawns for the elderly, disabled, veterans, active-duty military, first responders, and single parents. With America celebrating its 250th birthday this year and me also being born on July 4th, I wanted to humbly ask if a few kids from our program and myself could travel to Washington, D.C. to help mow the White House lawn for this historic celebration. More than anything, I want these kids to see how a simple act of service something as ordinary as mowing a lawn for someone in need can lead to extraordinary places. What better lesson in community service than showing them that helping others can take them all the way to our nation’s capital? I’d also love to bring my American flag-themed mower in hopes that the President might sign it, so I can later auction it off and donate 100% of the proceeds to a nonprofit supporting veterans. It would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to highlight the importance of service, patriotism, and the impact young people can have when they choose to make a difference. 🇺🇸

The age of the Democratic Party blocking fringe outsiders is officially over | David Marcus, Fox News There were two events on Tuesday that offered more proof of a national Democratic Party establishment that has lost control: One was a meeting, one an election, and both are harbingers of real danger on the American left. The meeting took place in Washington, D.C., between presumptive Maine Democratic Senate nominee, the Nazi tattoed, serial sexter Graham Platner and members of his party in that body. Some, mostly through wishcasting, thought this would be the end of the alleged oysters farmer’s run. Instead, it was a coronation, as was predicted in this column last week. A decade ago, one phone call from a party leader could have ended Platner’s run, but those days are gone. Today, the Democratic Socialists of America will no longer allow it. Here is what brave Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer had to say about the scandal-ridden candidate: "I met with Graham Platner today. We’re going to beat Susan Collins and take back the Senate." No, if, ands, or buts. This was echoed by almost every smiling Democrat leaving the meeting. There will be no last-minute coup to oust the socialist. Instead, the party is pretending to be one big happy family. That, as they say, is that, and the reason for it is clear. Schumer and grand poobahs of the party simply no longer have any leverage over the socialist candidates storming their keep. Platner doesn’t need establishment endorsements. He has Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and commie podcaster Hasan Pike. He doesn’t need establishment money, as there are progressive billionaires more than happy to donate. Even the left-leaning media, always in lockstep with the establishment, have little influence over voters these days. As in Maine, in New Jersey’s 12th congressional district, the Democratic Party elites were unable to fend off the radical Muslim (and socialist) candidate Adam Hamawy, who not only testified on behalf of the terrorist behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but also volunteered for an Al Qaeda-linked group in Eastern Europe. At best here, the Democratic primary voters in the Garden State are trying to send a terrorist sympathizer to the halls of Congress. At worst, he is just a flat-out terrorist. At his point, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who has been sounding the alarm about the craziness overtaking his party, isn’t just on an island. He’s on a whole different planet. Put bluntly, the far-left socialist extremists, with their Nazi and radical Islamic ties, are outflanking, often outspending, and absolutely outperforming the terrified geriatric leadership of the party. It’s become such a party of lunatics that, among the only partial wins the establishment notched Tuesday, in the primary to replace former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th district, was a weak first place finish for Scott Wiener, himself a leftist lunatic, now headed to a runoff. Wiener thinks that putting people on sex offender lists after sexual crimes is somehow anti-gay and would trans your toddler at the drop of a hat. But among his opponents was the former chief of staff for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Democratic Socialists of America star Saikat Chakrabarti, who finished in third, failing to make the runoff. Even this seeming victory is hollow, though. Pelosi endorsed Wiener just two years after she wielded the power to tell then-President Joe Biden that his career was over. Today, she can’t get the candidate she endorsed in her own district over 50%. This realignment of Democratic Party power, away from the old-school, Ivy League establishment, into the hands of the socialists, the radical Muslims and the guys with Nazi tats, will have profound implications for the 2028 presidential race. In the last two competitive Democratic Party primary cycles, 2016 and 2020, Bernie Sanders was iced out by party leadership. Remember how, in 2020, after Biden’s surprise win in South Carolina, all the non-socialist candidates suddenly dropped out? That is how it used to work. A decade ago, the Republican Party was overtaken by Donald Trump, and the GOP establishment was left like Wile E. Coyote frantically running in the air, unaware it was already over the cliff. But Trump was part of something much bigger. In fact, he had been a member of the Reform Party, founded by H. Ross Perot in his historic 1992 third-party run and later championed by Pat Buchanan. This was a long-running populist ascendency. Today, it is the Democratic Party establishment losing touch and losing power, seeing their neoliberalism fade next to leftist populism, a populism of wealth redistribution, antisemitism and, to quote Trump, "Trans for everybody." Biden was fond of saying that today’s GOP is not "the Republican Party of your grandfather." Well, I have some news for you, Grandpa Joe: The socialist Democratic Party you left behind and the socialist barbarians you have left at the gates, don’t look a whole lot like the party that made Bill Clinton president, either. And likely, it never will again. foxnews.com/opinion/david-ma…