Great questions. I’d be happy to answer both.
1st Play: There is no such thing as an “over the back foul”. We aren’t going to penalize a player just for being taller or jumping higher than their opponent, if they don’t create illegal contact. So we are looking to see if there is a push, or an impede with an extended arm. Wemby jumps straight up within his vertical plane to compete for the rebound. He does not hinder KAT’s ability to jump with an extended arm over him, nor does he jump into KAT and dislodge him. Actually, if there was a foul on this play, it would be for KAT backing into Wemby as Wemby jumps, and/or him hooking Wemby’s right arm, and hindering him from competing for the rebound. Wemby was the one potentially disadvantaged by KAT’s actions here, but since the rebound went to a Spurs player, it’s deemed incidental contact.
2nd Play: As Wemby is moving up the floor in a straight line path, Shamet slides into Wemby’s path in an attempt to draw a charge, but by the time he obtains a position on the floor in Wemby’s path, he doesn’t afford Wemby an opportunity to avoid contact, which is a prerequisite for obtaining a legal guarding position on a moving opponent without the ball (NBA Rule in Pic below). So by rule, Shamet is responsible for this contact. If Wemby had been disadvantaged by this contact (trip & fall, not been able to get to a potential pass in his direction, etc) then this would’ve actually been called a blocking foul on Shamet.
Can someone explain to me how this is not an over the back foul on wemby, and how this is not a offensive foul on wemby when he pushes Shamet from the free throw line to under the basket?
#PorVida #AlwaysKnicks