Edited 200 Long-form Videos for Business Owners | Scaling My Content Agency to $10k MRR | Sharing What I've Learned by Editing 200 Videos

Joined August 2022
278 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Finally, I have time to upload my work How long do you think it took me to edit? Honestly, this isn’t the best. I edited it in early January and looking back after a month, I can already see so many areas where I can level it up
34
1
90
2,974
Now editors will quote this and say “I made this animation using one prompt” Lol
Introducing Claude Fable 5: a Mythos-class model that we’ve made safe for general use. Its capabilities exceed those of any model we’ve ever made generally available.
2
3
290
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted
Your retention graph is showing you a problem that has nothing to do with your edit After cutting hundreds of talking-head videos And watching drop-off on every single one I started noticing the same pattern The first 3-5 seconds look like every other talking head on the internet. I've figured out the edit is almost never the problem The truth? The camera has already lost them before a single edit lands Here are 5 physical things you can do on-camera to stop that: Visual Motion Interrupts 1. Sip or eat something at the start. Eyes follow movement, and a cup being raised in frame gives the brain something to track before you've said a word 2. Use an unusual object as a "mic." An AirPods case, a marker, a TV remote. The visual absurdity creates a beat of confusion the brain needs to resolve, so it stays. Spatial Energy Shifts 3. Sit down into frame on the first word. Start standing, sit as you speak. The downward movement is a natural eye anchor that most talking heads never have. 4. Lean hard into the lens. Not a slight tilt, a committed lean like you're about to say something nobody else will. It creates a push-zoom feel without touching the camera. Background Pattern Interrupt 5. Place one irrelevant high-contrast image behind you. A movie still, a random graphic, a meme. The viewer's first second is spent figuring out why it's there, which is exactly long enough for your hook to land (I tried this and felt ridiculous, tbh, until I saw the retention stay flat instead of diving). None of these require gear, plugins, or more editing time And you'll fix more retention problems faster than any B-roll pack or transition effect ever could
1
1
5
513
AI is not going to replace video editors Wait, let me be specific AI is going to replace video editors who keep treating AI like a threat instead of a tool → 58% of creators already use AI-assisted editing in some part of their workflow → AI video tools are growing at 42% per year → And the editors getting the most work right now are the ones who know how to use both Here's the thing, the fear is real but it's pointed at the wrong target The danger is not AI getting better at editing. The danger is staying exactly where you were 2 years ago while the industry around you rewired itself. So what does the shift actually look like? AI right now handles rough cuts, auto-transcription, noise removal, B-roll matching, and motion graphics templating. It's genuinely good at this. The editor's job becomes the creative director's job. Someone who knows which AI output is worth keeping, how to push it further with manual skill, and how to shape raw material into something that actually holds an audience. That gap between "AI-generated" and "actually good" is still entirely human work. And that's exactly where the value is concentrating right now. The hybrid editor is who clients are looking for. Not the one who avoids AI and not the one who only uses it. P.S. The fastest way to figure out where AI fits your workflow is to spend one week actually using the tools you've been avoiding. Real projects, real edits, see what breaks :)
10
10
468
The last 3-4 weeks were crazy for me I really appreciate all your support guys
10
1
19
1,061
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted
Most video editors try to force one workflow onto every project But the truth? Consistent editing process doesn't mean consistent output Different video styles need different starting points entirely. After years cutting viral talking heads, cinematic pieces and vlogs And editing across all three for clients with completely different goals I've watched editors waste time because they picked the wrong first step. (took me way too long to figure this out tbh) I've figured out the three starting patterns that actually work Cinematic 1. Lock in the story first 2. Choose the music next 3. Edit to the story and music together The emotion and pacing are determined by the narrative and the track Start cutting before you know the story and you'll be re-cutting everything Viral Talking Head 1. Start with the raw content. Cut bad takes, dead air, and filler first 2. Do the primary cuts and tighten the pacing 3. Layer in graphics and animations last Motion graphics sit on top of a clean, tight edit Start with them and you'll lose the structure under all the layers Vlog 1. Write the full storyline and objective first 2. Select footage that serves the story 3. Build the structure around the narrative arc A vlog lives or dies by the story. Go in without a clear arc and you'll end up with beautiful B-roll that leads nowhere. Start at the right point for the right video type and you'll cut real time off every edit. And you'll wonder how you ever forced one process onto all of them.
5
1
7
281
Everyone keeps saying raise your prices and you'll land good clients But do you think clients are stupid? When you charge higher, they also see what value you're actually bringing to the table The price going up means your responsibility goes up too You're not just acting like an employee You're acting like a partner So before you just raise your rate Master the service Get the results first Then raise the price Good clients don't show up because your rate is high They show up when every puzzle piece actually matches Raise your price without the rest of it and you're just setting yourself up to disappoint someone paying $1000 or $2000 That's what I learned the hard way
8
12
150
This is huge 🔥
Higgsfield plugins for Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects are live. Generate images, videos, and transitions. Drag them into your timeline. Reframe aspect ratios without cropping. Remove backgrounds from footage. Draw on a clip to edit what you want. Upscale to 4K on export.
2
1
7
222
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted
In 2026, video quality matters as much as audio quality If you’re convincing yourself to just focus on audio, something is going wrong Creators invests in a $200 mic Records on Zoom (I literally saw this) Blurry. Pixelated. Unwatchable But the audio? Crystal clear Everyone expects: - Clean visuals - Sharp framing - Intentional pacing That’s the baseline now. When someone sees video below that, they don’t think “Let me give this a chance.” They leave. And if your audience has to force themselves to watch, you’ve already lost Stop optimizing for audio and ignoring video They’re equally important
12
1
14
569
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted

6
3
18
2,474
Seeing your old work hits differently. I wasn't satisfied with the quality I was producing because I kept comparing it to top guys back then. But now, looking back on those times, it feels great. It really helped improve my skills a lot. If you’re starting, compare your work to the top one, not to the guy at a similar level. Anyway, it still looks good even after a year. Doesn't it?
Intro part from an edit I made last week My client is quite impressed with the output, but I am not Now after a week, I'm starting to feel like things could be better, lol Can you rate this video out of 10?
6
10
309
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted
YouTube rewards watch time. YouTube rewards session time. YouTube rewards like to view ratio. YouTube rewards click through rate. YouTube rewards viewer satisfaction. YouTube rewards positive comment sentiment. YouTube does not reward how expensive your camera is. YouTube does not reward how hard you worked on the edit. YouTube does not reward how long you've been on the platform. YouTube does not reward how many videos you upload per week. The algorithm only cares about one thing: Whether viewers are happy they clicked on your video.
4
11
203
26,594
Ananda | Video Editor retweeted
For months I edited videos for $150 And no matter what I did, they never treated me like a partner I used to procrastinate a lot, thought the problem was me Watched hundreds of videos, asked AI tools and every answer pointed at the same thing, "You don't have fucking knowledge." I was seriously fucked up that time But as time goes by, I eventually raise my price. Now I charge $500, $1000 per video And shit, something weird happened They stopped treating me like an editor. Now they ask my opinion, they involve me in decisions And I'm slowly becoming their actual partner. But that's not because I magically got better overnight. But because price signals how you see yourself, and they follow that lead Don't blindly charge $1000 if you're not there yet. Maybe $200 is right for you right now, that's fine But keep improving, and raise your price as you do Because at $150, there's always someone cheaper ready to take your job Raise your price and build the skill to back it
6
1
9
227
The fastest way to kill the potential of your YouTube video? Asking for a like & comments Like & comment CTAs are a waste of your viewer's time YouTube doesn't care about likes It doesn't rank on comments It ranks based on whether people clicked and how long they stayed. Simple. Asking for a like wastes the 5 seconds you could have used to move someone toward something that actually matters Please don’t chase vanity metrics
1
3
193
Simple but requires a lot of efforts And that’s why most people fail to stand out
To stand out on YouTube just do the basics properly: • One video per week, every week • Spend more time on research than production • Find your idea in a different niche before your niche sees it • Make the thumbnail win attention before it wins clicks • Hook the viewer in the first 30 seconds • Push them to another video at the end Nobody does all of these consistently. The ones that do own their niche.
2
2
217