Glory to Lord Parshurama
Joined March 2024
- Tweets 2,282
- Following 283
- Followers 657
- Likes 5,579
754 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
14 Apr 2025
🧵-Misr Diwan Chand, a Saraswat Brahmin, was the chief of artillery and the Commander-in-Chief of the Khalsa Army. He played a significant role in the conquest of Multan and Kashmir. He successfully suppressed the rebellion of Nawab of Mitha Tiwana and forced him to pay tribute
6
26
65
9,127
GarudDhwaj retweeted
A few people think the ancient kings of Gilgit-Baltistan as purely "Hindu" or "Indian" dynasties. The historical evidence tells a far more complex story. Let's dig into the Patola Shahis and Daradic rulers.
🔥𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐚 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐡𝐢 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧 & 𝐊𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐖𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐎𝐟 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚.
The patola shahis were Buddhist Kṣatriya's who ruled during the Later Gupta age of 500—700 CE in The northern Kashmiri plains.
1
4
9
426
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 14
A stronghold of Saraswat Brahmins 20 kms from LOC with 90% Hindu population.
Jun 12
Ironically, the most naturally beautiful and aesthetic regions in India are either Muslim or Christian majority or significant.
The dirtiest states are Hindu majority. (1/4)🧵
1
4
14
398
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 13
Per Ain e Akbari, Sadharan the Father of Zafar Khan, the Founder of Muzzafarids had "been" a "Brahman".
Rajputs as a clan based group only claim Kshatriya Varna, hence they cannot be outcastes, where as Muzzafarids were outcastes from Varna per Ain and by Tribe per Mirat.
Jun 13
If a historian argues for a Tank Rajput background based on Sikandar’s account, regional politics, genealogy, and the poem’s symbolism, that is still a source-based historical argument.
2
6
16
1,512
GarudDhwaj retweeted
You are a very retard person in case of sahis you make kalhan your baap but in case of karkotas you reject him, moreover Al beruni indirectly accepted that Lalitaditya has won over the whole india rejecting his foreign conquests.
In history, the value is of evidence not hearsay conspiracy theories, I am still asking contemporary source chachnama even if accepted doesn't mentions Lalitaditya, it's a conjecture & alberuni ( your baap for shahis ) rejects it as myth so it all comes down to nill.
3
2
19
871
GarudDhwaj retweeted
In 1428 CE, during the reign of Sultan Zain-ul-Abidin, a Sanskrit inscription was carved at Khonamuh in Kashmir.
What makes it extraordinary is not the ruler's name, but the name used for the land he ruled:
Satisara.
A name that reaches back into Kashmir's oldest traditions <1>
1
20
42
1,415
GarudDhwaj retweeted
1964 :: Funeral Procession of PM Jawaharlal Nehru
181
611
6,098
108,904
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
Imagine taking charge of a nation left bankrupt by colonialism, bleeding from Partition, buried under mass poverty, then building dams, IITs, AIIMS, ISRO & PSUs, only to be compared to a leader who counts medals and gifting Melody as nation-building
165
1,098
5,608
150,371
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
Now,imbecile,
1)Bhatti heartland is the Bhattiana tract in Punjab,haryana,rajasthan,they or any other rajput has nthng to do with Gandhara or swat where Shahis were from.
2)That text says Bhat not Bhatti
3) U have no knowledge of persian,arabic or any other language.
Now fuck off
Jun 11
Asshole I was talking about Muhammad Baqir in that tweet who translated the Persian passage of Adabul Harb wash Shuja'a and that Arabic snippet was uploaded to counter your Brahman claim, you don't even know the difference of Arabic and Persian and here you are arguing with me.
2
1
15
1,320
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
"Nowhere Al-Biruni calls him Brahmin directly"
Once again,he does,quite LITERALLY.He first calls Kallar a brahmin and then at the end of the passage refers to all the others including Jaipal as Brahman Kings. And Jaipal was called a Bhat,not Bhatti,bhat being a synonym of brahmin
Jun 11
Nowhere Al-Biruni calls him a Brahmin directly, he tells us after Laghaturman Brahmins started ruling (then he closes the sentence and mentions some names of which we aren't certain whether all were brahmin or not). Secondly Bhima's inscription has nothing to do with Jaipal 1/2
1
7
35
1,328
GarudDhwaj retweeted
More gov sources on Brahmin ancestry of Pandit ram prasad bismil
source - Dictionary of Martyrs
Jun 10
महान क्रांतिकारी पंडित राम प्रसाद बिस्मिल जी का पूरा नाम पंडित राम प्रसाद बिस्मिल तिवारी है। वो राजपूत नहीं हैं हो सकता है कि उनके नाम का कोई क्रांतिकारी रहा हो जिनका उपनाम तोमर हो।
पंडित राम प्रसाद बिस्मिल तिवारी जी के प्रमाण जोकि पुराने हैं इस प्रकार हैं।
3
27
85
5,341
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
Bhai we discovered and posted Adab al-Harb first, back in 2024. They didn’t even know the name back then. First they made up the Bhatti, then the Janjua two fathers' thing, then came the Varman claim. Varman means Kshatriya. Hiuen Tsang called the Shahi Kshatriya First of all, they don’t even know that the Hindu Shahi dynasty hadn’t even started at that time. Second, the same Hiuen Tsang called the king of Assam, Bhaskarvarman, a Brahmin. Then how did 'Varman' become Brahmin?
In Adab al-Harb' itself, when Anandapala goes to conquer Lahore, drums are beaten and it’s proclaimed King of the Brahmins Jayapala'. Why wasn’t Rajput said anywhere here? Now don’t say 'it was for the protection of Brahmins 😂.
Then comes their biggest fraud from Kalhana’s Rajatarangini, where he mentioned some Kshatriya clans that claim descent from the Shahi dynasty. Even their Chauhans used to claim descent Prithviraj III is an incarnation of Lord Ram, and in Kali Yuga Ikshvaku got 4 pravars, so did Chauhan become 4 pravars? What nonsense is this. And who is he even arguing with, bro? He’s just an idiot, he copy pastes. Even people from his own community have insulted him.
2
5
155
Jun 11
🤙
Duryodhan Punjab ka Issar Baman tha 🤟
1
9
47
3,151
Jun 11
II may have many disagreements with Khatris, but it is a fact that Khatris are the Kshatriyas of Punjab
Jun 11
All scholars agree that Panjābī Khatris are Vaishya Or Shudras and descendants of Kshattri bastard caste of Manusimriti while moving out of Panjāb Khatri isn't a caste it is a Persian / Prakrit form of Kshatriya. Writing your personal opinions won't prove Panjābī Khatris warriors
2
20
1,018
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
Hindus shahis used to write brahman shahi on their coins , here is the coin of bhimadeva, predecessor of jaipala. The shahis were a brahman dynasty.
Jun 11
This Fake Jatt, Rakhelpoot of Saroha Rājputs think I am semi-intellectual like him. While I am quoting a Contemporary citation of Jaipal's Court which is recorded in Adabul Harb wash Shuja'a. I ain't a Dalit Kammi like you Jhatore. Bhattaraka was his title, while Bhattī was clan
4
32
1,707
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
This sad dalit is claiming to be tank rajput (they dont exist) clearly made this page to kang. Rajput is recent caste didnt existed in ainakbari. In swat inscription of jaipal he is written bhattaraka a brahmin as well all contemporary sources call him brahmin. Bhati r rajhstanis
Jun 10
Muslim Rajputra kanger,like his fellow hindu Rajputra kanger is either lying or being dumb,YET AGAIN. Is lying/being dumb a pre-requisite of joining the unionist gang? The text says Bhat which means Brahmin and not Bhatti. No rajput existed in Gandhara. QUIT COPING
2
2
15
619
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 11
The word used is Bhatt not Bhatti. That's what "sic" implies,that the word has been translated verbatim as in the text. While -an would denote plural,use of -yan/-ian too is common. It's a case of wrong interpretation.Bhattis never had any existence in that region,neither did
Jun 11
The plural of Bhatt is Bhattān not Bhattīan! The source is clearly calling him a Bhatti when the source uses the word بہتیست Bhattīsat which is a compound of Bhattī & (-ast) prefix, (-ast) means " Belonging to ", Bhattī (-ast) = he belonged to Bhattī tribe. Learn Persian first.
2
4
20
1,123
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 10
Jun 10
post a celebrity with the strongest aura ever.
2
2
17
455
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 10
Inbreeding has fried their prefrontal contex
Jun 9
It's always funny when Indians talk about colour.
Not that it makes anyone superior or inferior, but you're more likely to find fair-skinned people in Pakistan than in Hindustan.
Simply because the people of West Eurasia and the Steppe moved from North West to South East, first coming into contact with the Indus region before heading further East.
Indo-Aryan and West Eurasian/Iranian-related ancestry is more prevalent in the Pakistan region.
The second reason is UV radiation.
India is based at a lower latitude, while Pakistan is based on a higher latitude; hence, Pakistan's geography better protects its people from being exposed to UV radiation.
You can find similar-looking people in both countries, especially in the bordering regions, as no civilisation lives in complete isolation, but that's the general idea.
That said, let's hope our girls perform well, the real reason why everyone watches cricket, but Indians pollute everything with their inferiority complex.
4
12
168
5,785
GarudDhwaj retweeted
Jun 10
Military administrator Major General JN Choudhury and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru addressing public meeting in 1949 after Police Action in 1948 at at Fateh Maidan in Hyderabad.
1
6
21
923