20,002 Photos and videos
Japan vs Netherlands today at 1pm at sold out 85K stadium in Dallas should be epic. #WorldCup2026
1
1
2
158
The Gaslighting resulting from this one ref is next level. My entire feed is Africans and Europoors calling America racist because a man with Terrorists connection was refused entry.
UPDATE: Omar Artan, the facts moved and the outrage cycle did not.
THE VISA POINT
A US visa is not an entry pass. It authorizes travel to a port of entry and a request for admission. Artan had a valid visa, issued last week. The admissibility decision happens on arrival, by CBP. Not new, not Trump-specific.
THE EXEMPTION POINT
Somalia is on the travel restriction list, but the list has explicit World Cup exemptions for athletes, officials and staff. That exemption is why he got a visa at all. What it does not waive is individual security vetting. Nobody's does.
THE STATED REASON
The "no reason given" framing needs an update. CBP stated on record he was inadmissible over vetting concerns. A US official told the AP the basis was association with suspected members of terror organizations, anonymous because visa privacy law bars saying it publicly. Unproven, but a stated reason exists. What Artan was told at the airport is a separate question.
THE CELEBRITY POINT
The loudest framing is that turning away a famous, credentialed FIFA official is the injustice. Flip it. If vetting bends for celebrities and FIFA VIPs but holds for ordinary Somali travelers, that is the unequal outcome. Even application is the fairer principle.
FIFA'S OWN POSITION
FIFA's statement: it is not involved in host country immigration, and a host government ultimately determines who is admitted. True of every World Cup. Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022 both refused entries. Nobody called those tournaments illegitimate. Infantino himself called this "unfortunate" and told critics to chill, because screaming has the opposite effect of finding a solution.
THE EUROPE POSTSCRIPT
UEFA just handed Artan the Super Cup final, PSG vs Aston Villa in Salzburg, Aug 12. Good for him, genuinely. But notice what it proves: every country and confederation applies its own entry rules. Austria will vet him too. Sovereignty is not an American invention. The US made an admissibility call under its published rules. Europe made a different call under its rules. Both are allowed to. If the UEFA appointment is being sold as a moral verdict on America, ask what evidence UEFA reviewed that CBP did not. The answer is none. It is a football appointment, not an acquittal.
BOTTOM LINE
The denial might still be wrong. An anonymous official's claim is not proof, and Artan deserves better than trial by leak. But a country screening one match official out of roughly 170, under published rules, with a stated national security basis, is border enforcement working as designed. That is not the scandal it is being sold as.
92
UPDATE: Omar Artan, the facts moved and the outrage cycle did not.
THE VISA POINT
A US visa is not an entry pass. It authorizes travel to a port of entry and a request for admission. Artan had a valid visa, issued last week. The admissibility decision happens on arrival, by CBP. Not new, not Trump-specific.
THE EXEMPTION POINT
Somalia is on the travel restriction list, but the list has explicit World Cup exemptions for athletes, officials and staff. That exemption is why he got a visa at all. What it does not waive is individual security vetting. Nobody's does.
THE STATED REASON
The "no reason given" framing needs an update. CBP stated on record he was inadmissible over vetting concerns. A US official told the AP the basis was association with suspected members of terror organizations, anonymous because visa privacy law bars saying it publicly. Unproven, but a stated reason exists. What Artan was told at the airport is a separate question.
THE CELEBRITY POINT
The loudest framing is that turning away a famous, credentialed FIFA official is the injustice. Flip it. If vetting bends for celebrities and FIFA VIPs but holds for ordinary Somali travelers, that is the unequal outcome. Even application is the fairer principle.
FIFA'S OWN POSITION
FIFA's statement: it is not involved in host country immigration, and a host government ultimately determines who is admitted. True of every World Cup. Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022 both refused entries. Nobody called those tournaments illegitimate. Infantino himself called this "unfortunate" and told critics to chill, because screaming has the opposite effect of finding a solution.
THE EUROPE POSTSCRIPT
UEFA just handed Artan the Super Cup final, PSG vs Aston Villa in Salzburg, Aug 12. Good for him, genuinely. But notice what it proves: every country and confederation applies its own entry rules. Austria will vet him too. Sovereignty is not an American invention. The US made an admissibility call under its published rules. Europe made a different call under its rules. Both are allowed to. If the UEFA appointment is being sold as a moral verdict on America, ask what evidence UEFA reviewed that CBP did not. The answer is none. It is a football appointment, not an acquittal.
BOTTOM LINE
The denial might still be wrong. An anonymous official's claim is not proof, and Artan deserves better than trial by leak. But a country screening one match official out of roughly 170, under published rules, with a stated national security basis, is border enforcement working as designed. That is not the scandal it is being sold as.
1
2
982
1/ Update on the Omar Artan story, because the facts moved and the outrage cycle did not. A US visa is not an entry pass. It authorizes travel to a port of entry and a request for admission. Artan had a valid visa, issued last week. The admissibility decision happens on arrival, by CBP. Not new, not Trump-specific.
2/ Somalia is on the travel restriction list, but note: the list has explicit World Cup exemptions for athletes, officials and staff. That exemption is why he got a visa at all. What the exemption does not waive is individual security vetting. Nobody's does.
3/ The "no reason given" framing is now dead. CBP stated on record he was found inadmissible over vetting concerns. A US official then told the AP the basis was association with suspected members of terror organizations. Anonymous because visa privacy law bars officials from saying it publicly. Unproven, but it is a stated reason.
4/ The loudest framing is that turning away a famous, credentialed FIFA official is the injustice. Flip it. If vetting bends for celebrities and FIFA VIPs but holds for ordinary Somali travelers, that is the unequal outcome. Even application is the fairer principle.
5/ FIFA's own statement: it is not involved in host country immigration, and "a host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country." That has been true of every World Cup. Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022 both refused entries. Nobody called those tournaments illegitimate.
6/ The denial might still be wrong. An anonymous official's claim is not proof, and Artan deserves better than trial by leak. But a country screening one official out of roughly 170, under published rules, with a stated national security basis, is border enforcement working as designed. That is not the scandal it is being sold as.
2
5
630
Every sovereign state decides who crosses its border. A visa is permission to travel, not a right to enter. CBP makes case-by-case admissibility calls, the way the UK, the EU, Japan, and yes China do every day. The US applying its own border standard is not a scandal. It is Tuesday.
1
1
200
Every post on my timeline is Gaslighting about this one Somali ref.
1/ Quick reality check on the Omar Artan story before the outrage cycle sets the facts.
A US visa is not an entry pass. It authorizes you to travel to a port of entry and request admission. The admissibility decision happens on arrival, by CBP. This is not new and not Trump-specific.
2/ Somalia is on the current travel restriction list. You can think that list is too broad (reasonable debate). But the list exists. The question is whether it gets applied evenly or only to people without connections.
3/ Artan reportedly traveled on a diplomatic passport arranged through an embassy precisely because of those restrictions. A diplomatic passport does not bind the US. The receiving country has to recognize the status. It is not a skeleton key around immigration law.
4/ The loudest framing is that turning away a famous, credentialed FIFA official is the injustice. Flip it. If the rule bends for celebrities and FIFA VIPs but holds for ordinary Somali travelers, that is the unequal outcome. Even application is the fairer principle.
5/ And notice what nobody actually has: the reason. CBP does not disclose the basis for individual denials. The only on-record voices here are Somali football officials, who only know their side. Assuming bad faith from a process built to be confidential is a leap.
6/ None of this means the denial was definitely correct. It might not have been. But a country deciding who enters its borders, under a published policy applied without exception, is not the scandal it is being sold as.
175
1/ Quick reality check on the Omar Artan story before the outrage cycle sets the facts.
A US visa is not an entry pass. It authorizes you to travel to a port of entry and request admission. The admissibility decision happens on arrival, by CBP. This is not new and not Trump-specific.
2/ Somalia is on the current travel restriction list. You can think that list is too broad (reasonable debate). But the list exists. The question is whether it gets applied evenly or only to people without connections.
3/ Artan reportedly traveled on a diplomatic passport arranged through an embassy precisely because of those restrictions. A diplomatic passport does not bind the US. The receiving country has to recognize the status. It is not a skeleton key around immigration law.
4/ The loudest framing is that turning away a famous, credentialed FIFA official is the injustice. Flip it. If the rule bends for celebrities and FIFA VIPs but holds for ordinary Somali travelers, that is the unequal outcome. Even application is the fairer principle.
5/ And notice what nobody actually has: the reason. CBP does not disclose the basis for individual denials. The only on-record voices here are Somali football officials, who only know their side. Assuming bad faith from a process built to be confidential is a leap.
6/ None of this means the denial was definitely correct. It might not have been. But a country deciding who enters its borders, under a published policy applied without exception, is not the scandal it is being sold as.
2
1
1
911
They told us this would be China's century. Instead: the lowest growth target in its history, property down 65%, a record-low birthrate, deflation setting in. The US still owns AI, its own energy, and the world's reserve currency. One nation builds the future. The other manages its decline.
1
2
418
Quiet lesson of the Iran strikes: China buys more Gulf oil than anyone and contributed exactly nothing to the security outcome there. The US still projects decisive force into the region the whole world depends on. That asymmetry, not GDP charts, is what hegemony actually is. The customer can't defend the store.
13
5
921
China has roughly 8 months before the 2027 defense ban and the next wave of US rare earth processing scale up. China could have managed a soft glide path over decades. Instead they coerced Japan, Australia, Lithuania, Canada, then openly weaponized REE exports. Every squeeze accelerated reshoring. One-child policy class of error.
30
14
72
7,418
6). Circular Argument - When a person’s argument is just repeating what they already assumed beforehand, it’s not arriving at any new conclusion. Example, “According to my brain, my brain is reliable.” , “According to my brain, my brain is reliable.”
1
2
6
1). Ad Hominem. Example attacking a woman and using 'hormones' as an excuse is a type of ad feminam fallacy. Or you are just a Trump supporter. Study found that attacks on positions based on ad hominem fallacies were just as effective as attacks based on evidence
1
1
4