New Wolfage Update! Emotes are now LIVE! Customise your pup during fights/battles/dungeons with the custom emotes based on your spirit Find them in shop

🚀 Just got paid $35.30 today on @wolfswapdotapp! Earned 322,636 $PACK tokens from my activity between June 8–15. These rewards keep hitting different every week 🔥 Who else is stacking $PACK and getting real payouts? Drop your wins below @wolfswapwolfies 👇

What does "focus on the NFTs" mean? Price go up? Because if then, the price go up over night, after a couple of years of work Once a project gets out of the "euphoria" period that it is at the mint/token launch or first days of product; it enters the build phase Where no matter what you put out, you won't be able to match the energy of the euphoria phase That's where legends are born and true hard work and passion is it seen That "work" can be in different forms: > TCG, IP, Anime > Games, Toys > DeFi > Web3/Web2 etc. It can take literally any form. The only thing is that the work HAVE to incorporate the NFT into it in a way or another (yes IP do incorporate it) What's the best way to bring value? I think there's no "BEST WAY". Its just adaptability

i hear ppl say that projects need to "focus on the nfts" a lot. it's weak feedback because it implies that there's a successful blueprint for how to build a sustainable business off of "focusing on nfts" when the data clearly shows that there isn't. therefore, i believe projects should play to their own strengths, write their own playbook, be clear about their path, and then holders can decide if they want to be along for the ride or not. more thoughts below:

main question is: why did we fail to get the attention of CT on our crypto games while more degen ones succeed to do so well... CT doesn't care about gaming Kintara isn't fun at all (happy to be proven wrong) yet, everyone (=holders) act like if it is fun, and a novative gaming experience it's because those holders only need a "why" - why buy and hold a (meme)coin: a thesis and "omg a memecoin wrapped under a gamified exp"?? "the next axie!!" so cool, let's moon that!

Would the product marketing/road affect the token price directly? We have a clear example here, @R2D2zen presented it well, and honestly all the takes are legit As someone heavily invested time & money wise on Cronos, CryptoCom's descentralized chain, I was always aware of this discrepancy CryptoCom as a business grew beautiful in the past 2-4 years; From multiple licenses, to direct exposure to President Trump; to UAE and Asia; from institutions and OTC desk; The @cryptocom business is thriving in any shape or form Are all of these marketing campaigns working? Yes, for product. The KPIs for the marketing person are hitting, we can all see that But is that affecting the crypto-com-chain:native price ? Well....Not that much, because the token is not (yet) introduced in any way shape or form in the business operating plans to require buyback or add pressure into it (e.g. binancecoin:native on Binance) The first initiative for this will come with @CronosApp launch, that @Fwiz is now leading and (hints) showing launching June/July? Revenue from Cronos App will be used to buyback crypto-com-chain:native, so that will directly affect crypto-com-chain:native As the market matures, we will see more direct token exposure to the business growth, especially now that the SEC in US is more crypto friendly But so far, CryptoCom played on the very very safe (for business) side with the token, it being used especially f or card rewards, marketing exposure and few events

Would the product marketing/road affect the token price directly? We have a clear example here, @R2D2zen presented it well, and honestly all the takes are legit As someone heavily invested time & money wise on Cronos, CryptoCom's descentralized chain, I was always aware of this discrepancy CryptoCom as a business grew beautiful in the past 2-4 years; From multiple licenses, to direct exposure to President Trump; to UAE and Asia; from institutions and OTC desk; The @cryptocom business is thriving in any shape or form Are all of these marketing campaigns working? Yes, for product. The KPIs for the marketing person are hitting, we can all see that But is that affecting the crypto-com-chain:native price ? Well....Not that much, because the token is not (yet) introduced in any way shape or form in the business operating plans to require buyback or add pressure into it (e.g. binancecoin:native on Binance) The first initiative for this will come with @CronosApp launch, that @Fwiz is now leading and (hints) showing launching June/July? Revenue from Cronos App will be used to buyback crypto-com-chain:native, so that will directly affect crypto-com-chain:native As the market matures, we will see more direct token exposure to the business growth, especially now that the SEC in US is more crypto friendly But so far, CryptoCom played on the very very safe (for business) side with the token, it being used especially f or card rewards, marketing exposure and few events

Over 1 billion dollars in marketing spending. This probably represents the largest marketing experiment in crypto history. @cryptocom Publicly disclosed numbers add up to: >Arena naming rights: $700M >UFC: $175M >Formula 1: $100M >Matt Damon campaign: $100M That’s already over $1 billion before FIFA, UEFA, Coppa Italia, Copa Libertadores, AFL, and dozens of other partnerships over the years. crypto-com-chain:native