Lovely sentiment from Korsgaard, from towards the end of her Dewey lecture (cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.…). One of my ambitions in philosophy is to develop something like an interesting personal style of writing, as arrogant or pretentious a goal as that may be. I would value it.
ALT Philosophy is very hard, but it is not inevitable that philosophy should be esoteric; we just need to keep in view a certain conception of our reader. Our reader, our proper audience when we write philosophy, is not a journal referee, looking for a reason to reject our paper. Our reader is not a harsh philosophical critic, eager to catch us out in contradiction. Our reader is not someone who is unwilling to entertain a surprising hypothesis long enough to see where it goes. Our proper audience in philosophy is a reflective human being who is puzzled and confounded by her own condition, and who seeks understanding, meaning, and moral clarity. Philosophy is so difficult that we are afraid to try to address ourselves to readers conceived simply as human beings prone to philosophical perplexity. But if you think about it, you’ll realize that you understand the needs of that reader, because that reader is you.
I'm making a reading list for my transition from post doc to assistant prof. Is there anything you've read that really helped you think about teaching, research, and/or mentoring at the faculty level? Top 2 on my list are currently bell hooks' Teaching to Transgress and...
My paper "When the Beauty of Images Exemplifies: Considerations About Scientific Images and Understanding” has won the Teorema Essay Prize for Young Scholars 2022!
This paper wouldn't have been possible without the extremely valuable feedback from my beloved @LogicalAnalysis 🫀
My paper discussing some worries I have with implementing enactive psychiatry is now out in @JournalPHP. I apply here some insights from feminist philosophy of science and social epistemology to critique enactive accounts of mental disorder: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…
I talk a little bit here about a paper I’ve been working on for some time heavily inspired by Hacking’s looping effects of human kinds.
Listen in for my one/two hot takes! 🔥
The way we conceptualize mental disorders shapes the way people perceive themselves and their disorders.
In an interview with @BennettwKnox, @josarisoy1, and @ninasdeboer Edinburgh's @jelliedsours tells us the pros and cons of so-called mind-shaping.
philosophyexchange.org/podca…
The way we conceptualize mental disorders shapes the way people perceive themselves and their disorders.
In an interview with @BennettwKnox, @josarisoy1, and @ninasdeboer Edinburgh's @jelliedsours tells us the pros and cons of so-called mind-shaping.
philosophyexchange.org/podca…
The Winter program of the Philosophy of Psychiatry Webinar is out! 🥳
First talk of this series by Robyn Bluhm on January 26th (12PM EST) on zoom.
abstract and registration: philosophyofpsychiatry.com/
Worth listening to hear me try and ask @ninasdeboer mean questions which she replies to with absolute ease and grace (also Nina’s work is just the best)
New year = new podcast episode on philosophy of psychiatry!!
@BennettwKnox, @josarisoy1 and @jelliedsours interview @ninasdeboer about her work on network models of psychological disorders and their pros and cons with regard to traditional models.
philosophyexchange.org/podca…
New year = new podcast episode on philosophy of psychiatry!!
@BennettwKnox, @josarisoy1 and @jelliedsours interview @ninasdeboer about her work on network models of psychological disorders and their pros and cons with regard to traditional models.
philosophyexchange.org/podca…
Philosophy Exchange's Karl Reimer discusses the concept 'horizoning' - explored by Adriana Petryna in her new book "Horizon Work: At the Edge of Knowledge in an Age of Runaway Climate Change" - in his book review @LSEReviewBooksblogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci…
What role does aesthetics play in science?
With @alicemurphs we started out with aesthetics as a motivation for science, talked about possible epistemic roles aesthetics could fill in science and ended with surprising elements of scientific practice:
philosophyexchange.org/podca…
One of our founding members, @lore_sarto (PhD-student @LSEPhilosophy) just published his first paper. 🥳 Congratulations!
It is on external validity in thought experiments.
Check it out!
Link to preprint: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/215…
I had a great time talking about my @aapp_PhilPsych Jaspers Award paper (imminently forthcoming in @philpsychpsy) on the @PhilXchange podcast! So glad they are doing this miniseries on philosophy of psychiatry, and looking forward to subsequent episodes!
Today our first ever episode on philosophy of psychiatry came out!
Join in on a conversation about including pathologized individuals in the conceptualization or definition of mental disorders. Discussion with @BennettwKnox, @ninasdeboer and @josarisoy1philosophyexchange.org/podca…