1. With less than a week to go before Election Day, let’s talk about expectations, specifically the common expectation that this shouldn’t be a close race.
f anyone has forgotten Trump's previous [Fascist] record in the White House, esp his dealings with the DOJ, The
@guardian
has a recap, (with references to 1984)
theguardian.com/commentisfre…
Oh, the simple days of yesteryear, when we believed the American Fascists would not be "stupid or naive", but would claim to support the constitution...
More from "Army Talks" (thanks to @HC_Richardson )
archive.org/details/ArmyTalk…
Should've had this in high schools for 30 years:
"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022.
newsweek.com/donald-trump-ca…
The question is not "current % ownership".
the question is: "recent % of purchases".
That vast majority of homes are off-market for decades.
So you can buy 20% of "on-market stock" and still own only 1% of the total housing stock.
NEW: I have just finished a line-by-line comparison between the original trump coup indictment and the new one issued today. You can see what's been stricken, what's new, and why: muellershewrote.com/p/trumps…
Venezuela’s highest court ruled on Thursday that the country’s authoritarian leader, Nicolás Maduro, won the July 28 presidential election, despite overwhelming evidence that his opponent garnered the most votes. nyti.ms/3yFAz1h
"you suspect"
Go read the literature (maybe start with the Torah and other ancient religious texts)
The current push is a twist of the Catholic (popes/bishops) desire to increase there power/population/wealth by enforcing growth of their subjects.
Which is why I don't discuss "climate change" but rather I'm talking about actual "global warming" caused by increased CO2 in the atmosphere.
Other sources/causes of "climate change" may exist, but are not the problem we are currently facing.
re-posting this here, for reference; as it seems representative of Paul's posts about inflation.
And is from "a few weeks ago" :)
x.com/paulkrugman/status/153…
So the economy needs to cool off, which probably means some rise in unemployment. I still don't see the case for a deep recession; despite an uptick in survey numbers, inflation doesn't seem embedded in the economy. But a rough patch for sure 2/
Presumably since Paul said it (& 6 weeks ago) it is demonstrably false? or roses are blue?
Does Kyle *already* see a case for deep recession?
Or that there's not a rough patch?
(note: the mentioned uptick [expectations] survey was later revised down...)