I disagree, and I think many Pioneers are missing the real issue.
How different is this Launchpad from existing crypto launchpads, really?
Most Pioneers are not learning complex DeFi mechanics from these tests. The differences between the first and second Launchpad tests are minor and difficult for average users to understand. Claiming that repeated tests are "education" only works if users are actually learning something meaningful and practical.
The problem is timing.
If the first Launchpad was released in March, the ecosystem should have seen continuous progress afterward. One token launch every month would have made sense.
Instead, we are being told that this is only the second Launchpad test after three months, while the discussion focuses on technical differences that most ordinary Pioneers neither understand nor care about.
This is already the second Launchpad.
When will the third and fourth Launchpads happen?
And more importantly, when will Pi DEX finally launch?
The community is not asking whether Launchpads are useful. The community is asking for a roadmap toward real utility and real infrastructure.
Pioneers are not the only stakeholders in the ecosystem.
There are developers, hackathon teams, NFT projects, wallet builders, DeFi teams, and app creators who invested years building for Pi.
How many of those teams are still actively waiting?
How many have already reduced development, paused operations, or left entirely?
They are also part of the Pi ecosystem, and their patience is not unlimited.
As a community leader in Korea, I believe one of the biggest problems is blind defense of every Core Team decision.
Supporting Pi does not mean defending every delay.
A healthy ecosystem requires constructive criticism, accountability, and urgency.
Please stop looking only at the Pioneer side.
Look at the entire ecosystem.