Joined October 2021
482 Photos and videos
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
One day, everyone will hear about Banknotes The difference is that some will have to pay much more to become holders
6
14
46
1,012
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
It’s refreshing to see @banknotes_btc not giving a damn and cooking despite Ordinals & BTC being rekt. We need more of this. It’s no longer enough to say your pixelated monkey collection is inscribed on L1 forever. That was cool 3 years ago.
7
8
45
1,415
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
🚽600 pieces. One giant canvas When every square is filled, we'll freeze the wall, inscribe the complete artwork forever on Bitcoin, and airdrop it to everyone who helped build it Your piece is still editable. The snapshot date will be announced beforehand You still have time🫶 Draw something legendary. Draw something stupid. Draw something that future holders will laugh at 100 years from now History is watching✨
🚨Now the Hub has wallet connection Check the gallery, create a PFP with your Banknotes, and leave your mark on our first collaborative experiment 🚽The Collaborative Bathroom Wall is BANKNOTES first experiment a shared digital canvas accessible exclusively to collection holders. Each holder receives a fixed piece to draw on, leaving their mark on a collective artwork built by the community os.banknotesbtc.com/
35
18
97
11,137
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
wee seeen many new followers today thanks for da support. u still early on t00ns cause we not l00nching s00n as for collabs: all u've seen on the timeline is purely organic. we collected a few addys in the last months, we also messaged a few br0s that have been active u want to be considered for collabs yhh? pr00f of contribution is da way. post about t00ns, do sumthin bout t00ns, and we put u on da list. easier for us wen the time comes. if u message us just askin for collabs, with a template copy pasted 99999 times, b0000ring if it wasn't clear: we don't care if u a big r sm0l account, we want to see ur soul at wurk sum people changed their pp to t00ns, funny cause our design not final. we been in this nft game since 2019, we t00k lots of inspiration from og collections, new ones, failed ones, gud success story yada yada yada rite now, we having massive f00n. after 5 months of being active/inactive, it's heartwurming to see the support from the community but yhhhh, we not minting s00n, be chill, be nice, be t00ns about it* *this artwork is not contractual. the final collection may or may not include this piece. we explorin new leads, new designs, shapes, digging through art b00ks. this one was inspired by nigo and bape, iykyk
375
183
1,393
107,679
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Jun 4
polyscam
69
25
683
39,893
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
🚨Hub updates Gallery now supports wallet connection, so holders can view their own notes Trade button added to each note Coming soon: Top Sales, back side of the notes, and much more Send Notes higher and higher os.banknotesbtc.com/
16
17
67
5,435
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Here's my honest opinion on the MSTR market resolution. It will close NO. This is because UMA is forced to respect the rules as written by Polymarket. Polymarket changed the rules, and now the outcome is literally in the rules. Even if UMA voters think that this outcome is ridiculous... they are forced to ratify it. They must abide by the rules that Polymarket wrote. So really... in 5 hours, we simply receive confirmation that UMA is forced to follow centralized Polymarket decisionmaking. Polymarket can change the rules, at any time, for any reason, and UMA are forced to respect it. No voting needed. So is UMA really that independent? Does UMA hold any power whatsoever? Not really. It's puppet decentralization so that Polymarket can shift dispute blame onto a separate entity. This market most likely closes NO in 5 hours. But that doesn't change anything. The scam already occurred. Clearly, the way that this gets solved will not be through Polymarket's internal processes. So let's take it to the next level. In my opinion, Polymarket made a massive mistake here by changing the rules so brazenly. They fucked up... BAD. If you're going to rely on a system that offloads dispute blame to another entity, you shouldn't take it upon yourself to cut that entity out of the resolution process. Now, the blame falls entirely on Polymarket's shoulders. This really isn't a difficult argument to make. Any rational individual who looks at this market can conclude that Polymarket themselves now have the responsibility of this market's resolution. Big mistake, and that's what makes this case very different from prior UMA voting disputes. You can't hide behind UMA now. Polymarket markets are resolved according to a set of pre-defined and stated rules. Polymarket themselves modified these market rules. The clarification materially changed the conditions for a Yes outcome after trading had already occurred. Polymarket's own documentation says clarifications "cannot change the fundamental intent of the question." Clearly, this one did. Polymarket, your time is running out.
46
27
371
30,631
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
This MicroStrategy market is exposing the biggest problem with Polymarket If Strategy sold BTC on May 26, why is this still being treated like some philosophical debate? The rule was simple: “MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026” But now the outcome depends on UMA voting? So basically, the final truth is not only about facts, filings, or on-chain data, but also about who has enough UMA voting power? That is not the clean “decentralized prediction market” experience users were promised If whales can influence resolution through token-weighted voting, then small traders are not just betting on the event They are betting against market wording, oracle politics, and voting power This is exactly how trust dies @Polymarket @shayne_coplan @mustafap0ly @UMAprotocol prediction markets need clear rules, strict cut-off times, and neutral resolution Not “who can vote harder”
18
11
83
5,257
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
🚨 UPDATE 🚨 Official Statement on the Polymarket MicroStrategy Market I have formally served a legal demand letter - prepared together with legal advisors and counsel - on Adventure One QSS Inc., doing business as Polymarket, the Panama-incorporated entity publicly associated with Polymarket's international platform. This matter will be pursued under applicable Panamanian law and any other relevant jurisdictions. The written rule said "sells." It did not say "discloses." I will keep pursuing every lawful avenue available until this market receives a fair review. IN PROGRESS: I have also formally filed a complaint with the CFTC regarding the disputed market, "MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?" The rule said "sells," not "discloses." This dispute now warrants regulatory scrutiny, proper documentation, and an impartial review. I will continue preserving evidence and exhausting every lawful path open to me.
22
24
360
27,397
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
I have now sent the Polymarket evidence brief by email to: @CoinDesk @dlnews @CryptoSlate @FT @washingtonpost If you care about fair markets, please like, repost, and comment so more people can see this. If any journalist, editor, crypto researcher, legal analyst, or media friend is willing to review the evidence and write about this publicly, I would be deeply grateful. This should not fade away quietly. Too many users trusted the written rules. Too many people are now being ignored. We have to keep pushing. We have to fight this to the end. Rule before trade.
14
26
219
4,819
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
I’m 20 years old, still a university student. Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule. The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31. It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31. That is the whole issue. If you want to help: Repost this. Tag a journalist. Tag a lawyer. Send this to a crypto researcher. Submit your case if you were affected. polymarketfraud.xyz Silence is what platforms count on. Don’t give them that.
181
282
2,576
172,456
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
I still don't know who the biggest holder is, but I noticed that he has a passion for dollar banknotes. That's why this plaque will go directly to him🫶
24
26
108
3,496
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Thanks are due once again to the Airdrop Queen - @ElienMosk Beautiful @banknotes_btc added to the collection 🔥 🙏🙏🙏
6
6
68
1,029
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Jun 2
how can you not be bullish on @banknotes_btc? 2,000 banknotes no more, no less, permanently inscribed on the motherchain an eternal reminder of what banknotes will be like in 10–20 years the magic of ordinals: preserving art, banknotes, and doodles while keeping them intact! i want even more banknotes, damn it!
12
10
73
1,929
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Jun 2
The notes are on the move again 💶💷💵 5x @banknotes_btc just swept on ◉RD 🫡
13
16
89
1,720
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
BITCOIN ORDINALS
7
12
71
928
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Gm Gm believers
17
6
44
769
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
马斯克:Bound to happen $BOUND 社区:收到,马上安排起飞。🐰🚀 老马也在关注BTCFI,关注 BOUND!
Bound to happen. And now it’s happening on Bitcoin. 🐰🟧 Trade. LP. Grow. Choose the platform. Choose $BOUND. #btc #btcfi #runes #Ordinals
5
7
33
2,552
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
Big Sale 100 Dollars Sold for 0.007 BTC Available to trade on @Satflow satflow.com/ordinals/banknot…
16
14
92
1,760
PixelDaddy_⛩️ retweeted
We did it. Physical money is fragile. It burns, fades, gets lost, and is eventually destroyed. But Banknotes are eternal Every one of you is a legend. Together, we preserved a piece of history forever on Bitcoin. We made history, and future generations will remember what we built History is no longer stored in vaults. It's inscribed forever SEND NOTES
42
30
133
5,117