Joined January 2022
8,257 Photos and videos
Read the replies and quote tweets. The BIP-110'ers are now trying to cancel @Braiins 😂😂 And their reaction only proves @turtlecute33's point.
Knotzies are the woke people of Bitcoin. Everything offends them. Filters, spam, OP_RETURN, your node settings, your opinion. They cry, they lecture, they demand everyone comply. Bitcoin is a free market that self-regulates through game theory. You don't get a veto. Cope.
2
1
14
1,127
It's called spend and replace. As long as you work a job and earn income, you can replace the the money you spent. You don't see suitcoiners educating their followers about this because they want you to buy their stocks...
If you use your $BTC as “money” and spend it, you part with generational wealth. If you use your $BTC as “collateral” and intelligently borrow USD to spend, you retain generational wealth.
9
3
34
8,083
Anyone else disturbed at how Silicon Valley is portraying Trump as a badass for falliing for EA/AI safetyism garbage? The focus is all about how Anthropic "deserved" what they had coming, instead of the fact the Trump admin is perpetuating it....
6
631
"Digital Credit" sounds like it belongs to the "DAT" (Digital Asset Treasury) family of terminology. It's like when Brian Armstrong says "Crypto" instead of bitcoin. Why not say "Bitcoin Credit"?
4
28
1,960
What happens if Tom Lee launches a preferred equity and co-opts the term "Digital Credit"? Due to the nature of Proof of Stake, they can probably offer higher yields. The suitcoiners need to emphasize the soundness of BITCOIN SPECIFICALLY is what allows for this scheme to work
2
11
868
Does anyone have any explanation for why @Truflation believes CPI should be 1.88%, when the official number is 4.2%?
🇺🇸 Truflation Daily US CPI is 1.88% YoY today, ⬆️ 0.09%.🇺🇸 Claim FREE CREDITS NOW and explore more bit.ly/4tjSiBF
3
11
1,671
Hey @Grok, are preferred stocks that pay a dividend classified as "credit"?
Digital Credit. Digital Money. Digital Equity. Digital Treasury. My conversation with @ColeMacro at @BTCPrague on the future of capital markets, followed by Q&A on the nuances of Bitcoin-backed securities and corporate finance.
4
1
23
11,334
It's so hard for these people to conceptualize a reality where the bitcoin price would be higher today if @Strategy and all the other treasury companies didn't exist.
23
1
80
12,942
Bitcoin is an asset that doesn't like when leverage is applied to it. I remember when @CorySwan tried to popularize the term LBE (Leveraged Bitcoin Equity), presumably because what made $SQNS stand out against the rest was that it had more debt than the others. I thought LBE was terrible branding because all it did was advertise the weakness and froth in this market. The company had no revenue, was leveraged to the tits on an asset that also has no revenue, so guess what the short sellers did? They shorted the stock into oblivion so they couldn't raise more capital, and then stop hunted their liquidation price on the underlying BTCUSD, and they essentially got liquidated. The truth is nobody wants to allocate to bitcoin when you hear about all these zombie companies with no revenues levering up their balance sheets. It just sounds like a frothy overhang that needs to be cleansed, and it scares people away. And I honestly believe the only reason the suitcoiners have been able to buy so BTC, was because they co-opted the narrative and degraded the culture so much, that the OGs and true believers got demoralized and sold. If the suits didn't come in, I bet most of those OG coins never would've hit the market and we wouldn't have all this sell pressure. Not to mention, these treasury cos are extremely capital inefficient vehicles to buy bitcoin. If you want BTC price appreciation, you want Wall Street capital flows to come into the ETFs, because at least with those $1 invested actually represents $1 dollar of spot volume.
4
1
16
1,344
Correct. Which is why @Saylor @PunterJeff @ColeMacro @IIICapital @AdamBLiv's assertion that these securities should back stablecoins and become a medium exchange is Do Kwon levels of irresponsible. These guys are total clowns who need to be laughed out of our ecosystem.
Replying to @Vladcostea
Except $MSTR won't be liquidated, they will just abandon the $STRC price stability mechanism instead
2
38
2,516
Pretty spot on tbh
32 bitcoin is nothing, but Saylor demonstrated he bleeds. Gods don't bleed.
3
32
4,119
We've likely hit the blowoff top on @Saylor's reign as bitcoin's main character. Of course he still has 800k BTC and still has 5 million followers so he will always retain relevance. But his larger than life persona is gone and his words won't carry the same weight anymore.
9
1
45
1,916
And not just @Saylor, but Saylor-ism as an ideology is likely out the door too. All of his mini-mes, @PunterJeff @IIICapital @ColeMacro @AdamBLiv totally jumped the shark this week by positioning their stocks as being the true digital medium of exchange, not BTC
10
648
"no company has the debt structure which would cause the firm to puke BTC on a drop" -Steve Lubka, VP of Investor Relations, @Nakamoto, June 2025 ...1 year later:
Treasury companies either accelerate a Bitcoin sell off *or* buffer a sell off in a bear market Which path this will take relies heavily on the financial structure of these firms But so far no company has the debt structure which would cause the firm to puke BTC on a drop
8
2
54
6,418
BTW, there was sooooo much FOMO "it's early" "there's no signs of froth" "the mania is yet to come" etc. style promotion for BTCTCs coming from that account back when his stock was trading at like 20x mNAV. His aggressive promotion was extremely irresponsible, especially because it was all during that period when the PIPE investors hadn't got their shares and the stock was super illiquid. People called me a "hatooor" at the time, but all I did was get a calculator out and did the math. 🤷‍♂️ x.com/DzambhalaHODL/status/1…

Replying to @RoaringRagnar
My personal view is that we are just entering the early ramp into what becomes a mania Reasons 1) Almost no large crypto traders have stated talking about Treasury companies. If the people closest to Bitcoin aren't watching it hasn't spread further 2) Bitcoiners are still extremely divided on these, the early traction is almost entirely from MSTR investors 3) Concepts like mNAV are still polarizing, I would expect people writing essays justifying 20x mNAV near the top 4) There are only two real Treasury companies operating at scale: Strategy and Metaplanet. Everything is a half measure of still ramping up from a tiny base. The three big entrants (NAKA, CEP, ASST) haven't even completed their mergers - and these are the early movers
2
13
1,386