FACT CHECK The Biological Threat Reduction Programme (BTRP) is the biological branch of the DOD's Cooperative Threat Reduction programme. It was implemented by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). 1. "dangerous Gain-of-Function research" ❌ The project table lists avian flu diagnostics, swine fever risk analysis, and glanders serology. These are surveillance and diagnostic activities, not gain-of-function research. DTRA has explicitly stated that the BTRP sponsors no gain-of-function research. 2. "new details on clinical trials... raising significant ethical, financial, and security concerns" ❌ Not mentioned anywhere in these four slides. 3. "knowingly withheld... intentionally covered up" ❌ The programme has been in congressional budget requests, DOD fact sheets, and GAO reports for years. DTRA publishes its own fact sheets on it. The Russian disinformation campaign around these labs is itself documented in these slides and has been tracked publicly since at least 2022. The IC was warning about Russian exploitation of these labs, not hiding the labs themselves. Russia's allegations have also been formally tested twice in international proceedings: at a Biological Weapons Convention Formal Consultative Meeting in Geneva in September 2022, attended by 89 countries, which ended with no consensus supporting Russia's claims; and at the UN Security Council in November 2022, where Russia's resolution failed, with multiple delegations stating that no credible evidence had been presented. 4. "with very little visibility or oversight" ❌ The slides show an Especially Dangerous Pathogen certification process, US bio-containment training, and biosafety assessments. The programme has been subject to congressional oversight throughout its existence, with the DoD holding audit rights over every facility receiving assistance under the 2005 bilateral agreement. Under US federal law (18 U.S.C. § 175), any official knowingly sponsoring weapons-related biological work in Ukraine would be committing a federal felony. 5. "a US-funded biolab in Ukraine likely housed dangerous pathogens and remained vulnerable to Russian attack, seizure, or damage" ❌ The slides do say IECVM in Kharkiv likely houses dangerous pathogens and is vulnerable to seizure or damage. But IECVM is a Ukrainian-owned and operated institute that received US assistance. It is not a "US-funded biolab" in the sense the press release implies. Every facility that receives BTRP assistance is owned, operated, and staffed by the Ukrainian government. The DoD's own fact sheet states: "The Ukrainian laboratories are owned and operated by the government of Ukraine." 6. "Russia accused the U.S. of BW work in a basement lab" treated as a finding ❌ The slide frames this as an example of long-standing Russian disinformation targeting IECVM, not as something the IC is confirming. 7. "more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries" ❌ The slides cover Ukraine only. BTRA does operate in over 30 countries, but that has been publicly documented on DTRA's own website for years. The 120-lab figure does not appear in these slides. Conclusion: The slides describe a previously known US assistance programme to secure and monitor Ukrainian labs holding Soviet-era pathogen stocks, with the IC's actual concern being Russian seizure and disinformation, not a hidden US bioweapons network. Russia's specific allegations about these labs have been examined and rejected in two formal international proceedings.

2022 Fact Sheet on DoD Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program: Biological Threat Reduction with Partner Countries geneva.usmission.gov/2022/04…

Ballot curing letters ≠ rejected votes 🟦 LA County v 🟥 Placer County show the same story across past elections: 98% of mail ballots are counted. Curing allows voters to address missing or non-matching signatures. Rejected ballots due to signature issues were <0.6%.