🚨 HISTORIC MOMENT 🚨
🏛️ The true name of PubPeer, i.e., “PubSmear,” originally coined by
@Kevin_McKernan, has for the first time entered the United States Congressional Record.
The term appeared through the inclusion of Dr.
@MaryanneDemasi’s article, entered into the record by
@SenRonJohnson.
The article examines concerns that PubPeer’s unchecked anonymity can be weaponized to harass, discredit, defame, and intimidate researchers who challenge established narratives.
The debate over anonymous, coordinated so-called post-publication criticism on the compromised PubPeer—and the perpetrators (approximately 30 individuals, as documented by the ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team) operating the network mob behind it under the guise of research integrity—has now reached the halls of Congress.
It is time to investigate the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status of the fraudulent PubPeer Foundation.
It is also time to examine the institutional arm of the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob, Retraction Watch (also referred to as “Retraction Mob”), and its parent organization, the Center for Scientific Integrity (CSI), both of which operate under the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.
đź”— Link to the article in the first comment.
đź”± We at
@SciGuardians thank all those who continue to stand against abuse, intimidation, and censorship in science and to work tirelessly in support of genuine research integrity and accountability.