Not affiliated with Project Libertarian. We’re way cooler and more principled than they are.
Joined May 2026
- Tweets 1,385
- Following 254
- Followers 481
- Likes 5,767
289 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Jun 12
"Nationalism isn't compatible with libertarianism" is something I've been seeing a lot of libertarians on X repeating again.
I recommend Rothbards Nations by Consent
cdn.mises.org/11_1_1_0.pdf
Nationalism is not only compatible with libertarianism, but is important to understand.
"when the 'nation' has been thought of at all, it usually comes attached to the state, as in the common word, 'nation-state'... The 'nation' of course, is not the same thing as the state, a difference that earlier libertarians and classical liberals such as Ludwig von Mises...
2
4
15
543
as a libertarian 'techbro' i actually despise LLM subsidies far more than i despise many other subsidies bc they directly hurt me and my field.
Jun 14
Bangalore libertarian techbros want farmers to forego government subsidies because free market is best.
But somehow government must fund their shitty LLM that nobody will ever use. Why no free market here my brother?
1
3
ProjectAncap retweeted
>makes up scenario in head
>gets mad over it
??
Jun 14
Bangalore libertarian techbros want farmers to forego government subsidies because free market is best.
But somehow government must fund their shitty LLM that nobody will ever use. Why no free market here my brother?
1
3
8
77
oh thank god, california isnt that bad, yet.
JUST IN: Billionaire wealth tax no longer projected to be on California ballot, as billionaires worth a combined $1 trillion flee the state in historic wealth exodus.
2
29
ProjectAncap retweeted
Do we thank these patriots now or later..?
JUST IN: Billionaire wealth tax no longer projected to be on California ballot, as billionaires worth a combined $1 trillion flee the state in historic wealth exodus.
5
16
441
11,159
>not an economist
>never used it
wrong on both accounts lmao.
Ronald Reagan ran on that in the 1973 Proposition 1 campaign
14
122
>nazism above classical liberalism
what the fuck are we doing here chat
4
34
577
ProjectAncap retweeted
14h
If you're an adult raging on X about the ban on social media for under-16 kids, then you need your hard drive checked.
Community note
Opposition to the UK's under-16 social media policy stems from documented concerns over mandatory age verification, privacy risks, and enforcement inconsistencies, per official briefings and consultations.
commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief…
gov.uk/government/con…
7
41
482
its genuinely crazy how much of left-wing thought comes down to denying supply and demand.
1
7
98
ProjectAncap retweeted
Communists started a whole organization centered around abolishing age of consent. Popular communist writings advocate for the same. Famous communist leaders raped children. Pedophilia is inherently communist, and vice versa.
Projecting child molestation because that's what all right-wing politics ultimately revolves around
7
11
97
1,611
ProjectAncap retweeted
Jun 14
The only good reason to be angry about Elon becoming a trillionaire is due to it symbolizing how debased the dollar is. Inflation is theft.
But that would mean knowing that rich people existing isn't inherently bad, which is contrary to both communist ideology & State interests.
Jun 14
The libs are angry at Elon becoming a trillionaire because he provides useful services
We should actually angry about the existence of a trillionaire due to inflation
15
29
322
6,911
ProjectAncap retweeted
Jun 11
trump rn:
Jun 10
JUST IN: Trump reveals the U.S. has secretly been taking out “millions of barrels” of oil from Iran every night.
27
291
6,848
238,105
ProjectAncap retweeted
Famously, no one ever had to work a day in their lives until evil billionaires invented capitalism.
Jun 13
120
525
11,029
138,297
A libertarian recognizes that defamation* is not aggression.
A libertarian also realises that defamation is not a part of civil society.
A libertarian will disassociate from defamers.
*minus that which is covered by fraud.
1
1
29
286
🧵[1/3]
I put forth the following pro-praxeological and anti-empiricist argument against natural monopolies:
Either one must work within the a priori reasoning of praxeology and accept that natural monopolies cannot exist, or one most work within the a posteriori.
2
2
20
480
🧵[3/3]
In addition, this ruins **ANY** empiricist arguments against ancap **IF** one tries to claim that "bc a natural monopoly never existed* means it **CAN'T** exist", as they must cede the same argument within the a posteriori for ancap.
1
14
84
🧵[2/3]
doing so results in a stalemate, as no natural monopoly has ever existed*.
*feel free to try prove me wrong
6
18
146