echoesofeternity.substack.co… True conservatism is the defense of eternity. As eternity is the soul of the world, revolution is always a return to eternal source. That's why conservative revolution is the way.

The right has a serious problem: good altar boy syndrome. I’ve lost count of how many times little bitches have come at me like despotic school headmistresses, scolding me about “good manners,” “degeneracy,” “swearing,” “rock is demonic,” etc. Let me tell you something: our enemies in history executed nuns and priests, slaughtered princes and princesses in cold blood, created enormous systems of political terror - and your “great political revolution” is policing the behavior of adult men who are on your own side? Literally: go fuck yourself! Yes, I’m not well-behaved, respectable, clean-cut, or from a good family. I am a political soldier of my faith and my tribe. My bloodline is that of men who opened the oceans and imposed the cross at the edge of the sword to the four corners of the world. Those men were criminals, degenerates, conquerors, adventurers who drank, smoked, fucked, and made any bitch pay dearly when he stepped out of line. Our enemies are monsters. And only even more terrifying monsters will triumph over the left. Good little boys, priests, nuns, and school girls don’t make political revolutions! I, and every man who honors his backbone, accepts only God as his judge - not old moralist hags posing as men.

Women react to what they feel, not to logical coherence. This does not mean they are incoherent, but that they follow the coherence of affections. Otto Weininger in Sex and Character demonstrates how the feminine mind is incapable of separating the analytical dimension from the affective one: everything in a woman has an emotional reverberation. This is different from man, who is capable of separating the analytical dimension from the affections. This is why women support the feminist and progressive ideology that the regime sells, while at the same time dreaming of being oppressed by vampires, werewolves, aliens, criminals, etc. Both dimensions, which are logically incoherent, make them feel - this is the central term - good and alive.

Nothing is faker than the World Cup. Football has become a spearhead and vehicle for globalist propaganda. Once upon a time, football was a pastime for British men to entertain themselves while they subjugated the world to their global empire. Today, it is nothing more than a space for careerist players with zero sense of ethnic or cultural belonging and no real love for the sport - a perfect tool for big brands to spread progressive ideological garbage. Do yourself and Western culture a favor: boycott this shit.

Make Federal Buildings Deco Again.

Modernity is only seen as "decadence" in the eyes of "Perennial Tradition," just as Middle Ages is viewed as "darkness" by the shallow Enlightenment perspective. Both visions are imbecilities. No historical period can be entirely corrupt or entirely progressive. Only certain ascensional or entropic forces become dominant or recessive. But exists a Counter-History of Modernity: neither scholastic orthodoxy nor militant materialism, but the Christian Neoplatonism of Marsilio Ficino, Pico della Mirandola, Cornelius Agrippa, and Giordano Bruno. The Christian Neoplatonic tendencies within modernity were reduced to "witchcraft" by the Church and to "magic" by materialism. Yet they simply represented an aristocratic and idealistic impulse of a modern world that saw itself as the continuation of the classical and medieval world. This false struggle between "tradition" and "progress" ceases to be a problem once we understand that the eternal order manifests within historical time, and that all true progress is a return to that eternal source.

Intellectual vagabonds always seize power. The dominant ideas of a future era have always been the work of thinkers and individuals who were not politically and socially integrated into the order in which they lived. Rousseau and Marx came to be considered founders of political regimes; but during their lives, they were persecuted pariahs. The same can be said of the beatniks and hippies of the recent past. In their time, boomer hippies risked everything - career, family, respectability - in the name of values ​​that seemed like madness to the dominant order. However, today, such boomer and hippie values ​​are the very substance of the dominant ideology. The right confuses the capacity for political action with political hegemony. The two do not necessarily go hand in hand. It is possible to have one and not the other. That is, the dominant political power of an era was at some point conceived and lived by rebellious and vagabond subjects in the eyes of the established order. If we consider Christianity beginning with twelve disciples wandering the world and preaching the Gospel, this becomes even clearer.

First, if any person can claim to be a woman, feminism has literally ended as political cause. Second, those who think there will be some miraculous reaction from entertainment industry based on economic rationality can forget it: the goal is to shove down everyone's throat an ugly, talentless, unbearable woman whose only function is to "educate" us politically. Hollywood, universities, and the media - all of it has been lost forever. They are now identitarian fiefdoms. What we need are filmmakers, think tanks, and alternative right-wing media outside the dominant cultural circuit.

The Struggle for the Cultural Soul of the West. Bourgeois thought hates the soul because it worships the intellect. The intellect is analytical; the soul is synthetic. The intellect divides; the soul unifies. The intellect is mechanical; the soul is organic. Under the aegis of bourgeois intellect - in both its liberal and Marxist versions - the soul of the West has been lacerated and shattered in the name of rationalist abstractions such as “equality,” “human rights,” and “democracy.” Yet these theoretical fetishes were born from a unique spiritual soil: the European soul that has always dreamed of a freedom befitting its condition as creator of culture. Outside that ground, such abstractions have served only the enemies of the West. It is necessary to restore the authority of the soul over the intellect. The intellect is necessary and important - through it we produce science, engineering, technology, and so on. But without the higher ends that the unity of a soul grants to a people and a culture, mere intellectual power is reduced to technical - military and economic - domination, while the soul withers. And thus a civilization dies.

"She walks in Beauty, like the night Of cloudless climes and starry skies; And all that's best of dark and bright Meet in her aspect and her eyes: Thus mellowed to that tender light Which Heaven to gaudy day denies. And on that cheek, and o'er that brow, So soft, so calm, yet eloquent, The smiles that win, the tints that glow, But tell of days in goodness spent, A mind at peace with all below, A heart whose love is innocent!" - George Gordon Byron, 'She Walks In Beauty'

“All these noble ideas about equality and fraternity are lies. They exist to make fools march in line.” — Louis-Ferdinand Céline

At least in my city - but I believe this is true of all major cities in the West - proportionally beautiful and elegant couples have completely disappeared. Zero! Nowadays it’s always the same image: a beautiful, well-groomed woman standing next to a physically ruined man who is dressed aesthetically like a servant - sneakers, shorts, and a t-shirt. The very image of male servitude. The worst part is that this has become a social pressure: men must not be “toxic” or sexually assertive, while the woman expresses her independence by being beautiful and well-dressed. It’s a comfortable aesthetic cage that men have willingly stepped into. Meanwhile, handsome, elegant, and intelligent men find themselves isolated at home, training and reading Schopenhauer and Spengler, because their mere existence is seen as an existential threat to feminist and progressive lies.

The main reason why modern state denies natural inequality between men is that the idea of equality serves to break the natural bonds of fidelity between masters and servants - between those born to command and those born to obey. In place of these feudal bonds, the modern state puts fidelity to abstract principles - equality, human rights, progress - which in reality mask the reduction of man to a servant stripped of all personal value, whose only usefulness is to serve the state and the market. The "equality of all men" can only be guaranteed by the servitude of all before the state: both natural masters and natural servants. Kant said that man is the animal that needs a master. The choice in any political order is who that master will be: the natural lords or the bureaucratic state ruled by bureaucrats castrated of all vitality and culture.

When we use the term “left,” it gives the impression that there is a defined set of values that the left defends. There isn’t. That’s why Dostoevsky used the word “movement” to refer to the revolutionary nihilist spirit. Marx himself used to say that the criterion of truth was revolutionary praxis. In other words, the true goal is the infinite destruction of every single difference in the name of egalitarian abstractions. The “utopia” of the left is merely the image of an unburied corpse that decomposes endlessly.

Politics has nothing to do with hate, but with the preservation and affirmation of ways of life. A lion does not “hate” a rat. He is indifferent to a rat. The existence of a rat infestation would compel a lion to act, but not out of “hate”, but to guarantee the integrity of his territory. A right-wing man does not “hate” - he fights for his way of life and culture. He has read Thucydides, Xenophon, Aristotle, Hobbes, Machiavelli, and Schmitt, and he knows that politics is a science, not a space for resentful people “hating.” The idea that political action exists because certain people “hate” other groups is a leftist therapeutic myth that the right must reject violently.

Hell is not the place of total freedom, but of absolute control. “Racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “transphobia,” etc. - none of these terms were created with the goal of making the world better, but to establish total control over minds. Think about it: “phobia” is a clinical psychopathology. If I have a psychopathology regarding the idea of sexual practice between people of the same sex, why on earth should I then be treated as a moral and political pariah? A sick person deserves understanding and care, not political intimidation and moral blackmail. The issue was never about making the world better. It was always about restraining the human soul by prohibiting any distinction between virtue and vice, sin and holiness, morality and immorality; thus creating the conditions for a fully anti-Christian society. This photo perfectly reveals the nature of the political order they seek to build: a society of total control, total obedience, and total servitude, where the human soul that recognizes values and meanings beyond the State will be persecuted and hunted down precisely because it refuses to renounce the vertical impulse of the spirit. The militants of May ’68 used to say: “It is forbidden to forbid.” No slogan more totalitarian and tyrannical than this one has ever been created.

Entertainment executives: "our product would only appeal to those who appreciate our product, so in the name of those who don't appreciate our product, we won't launch our product." We live in an era where the surface preaches diversity and plurality, but underneath it all there is the most complete uniformity, based on numbers and algorithms. This applies to everything. Our time hates originality, intelligence, difference, and hierarchy. Because all of these things imply that some people are capable of loving certain things more than others. The obsessed Star Wars or Star Trek fan is a kind of aristocrat in his private world, devoted to a pleasure that few can access. So our era demands that this too be “democratized,” and thus everything is reduced to numbers and statistics - the favorite metrics of slaves.