If a hindu girls is famous and holds even slightly secular views, she is bound to fall in love with a Muslim man and Nikah also with them.
This story repeats the same sentiment often expressed by Hindu girls: "My Abdul is different from the rest." To this day, such girls have not been able to convert Abdul to their religion. On the contrary, it is those very girls who have had to change their religion and customs. Take this story, for example.
In the first frame, social media influencer Shilpa Khetwani is seen with her father, while the person in the second frame is Mohammad Sajid.
By entering into a *Nikah* (Islamic marriage) with each other, they try to project themselves as "liberal" and modern-thinking individuals, whereas the reality is quite different.
As per news, Before marriage, Shilpa observed Hindu rituals and celebrated Hindu festivals at her parents' home. However, after marrying Sajid, she is never seen performing *puja* (worship) at her husband's house. In fact, whenever a Hindu festival arrives, she has to visit her parents' home to celebrate it. Conversely, Eid and other Islamic festivals are celebrated at her husband's home with full adherence to religious customs.
They have given their children Islamic names, and not a single idol of any Hindu deity is to be found in her Muslim husband's home.
This raises a straightforward question: if 'Abdul' is not engaging in 'Love Jihad,' why doesn't he marry Muslim women? If he preferred a Hindu woman, why didn't he renounce his own religion for her? If they are truly "liberal," why does the compromise happen in only one direction? Why don't Muslim men make compromises for the sake of love—why is it always Hindu women who do so?