People need to get informed of the facts and stop buying into the bullshit being spread by politicians and folk with vested interest in making it happen.

“Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards” And this is what it’s really all about. Disgusting

You can do it quietly and stealthily or you can do it loudly and proudly while fighting off cops

SOURCE: reclaimthenet.org/uk-wants-m…

JUST IN: UK police launch criminal investigation into officer accused of using AI to “create evidence”

We used to write dystopian science fiction about this, you know.

👁️Guilty until proven innocent. ‘I wanted to die on the spot. He was loud and aggressive and acted like I was the biggest criminal. I just broke down in tears.’ A woman was wrongly accused of being a criminal in a @SportsDirectUK shop using facial recognition. "The idea that we are all one facial recognition mistake away from being falsely accused of a crime, thrown out of a store and blacklisted without explanation should send a shiver down the spine" - Jasleen Chaggar Read⤵️ metro.co.uk/2026/06/10/mum-w…

If a BLM protector painted “No Whites Allowed” or someone had put “Sharia Zone” up there you’d be seeing a shot of it on the rolling news every four seconds

The UK government spyware demand means that the government decides exactly what should be censored on every mobile device. They say they will start with nude pictures (if you don’t identify yourself as an adult). But it could at any time be expanded to anything the government disapproves of. Today, 30 people are arrested every day in the United Kingdom for writing something online that the government classifies as "grossly offensive". It is obvious that they will use this tool to restrict free speech. Currently, there appears to be no requirement to report findings outside the device. However, with both legal and technological decision-making power taken away from individuals and transferred to the government, that is only a pen stroke away. This means that the government could also use this system for total mass surveillance. And they can do so in secret. The government recently, in secret, tried to pressure Apple (which is now agreeing to client-side scanning) to build backdoors into its end-to-end encrypted cloud service. They can do this under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, also known as the "Snoopers' Charter" – a law that makes it illegal for tech companies to disclose secret demands from the government.

... We would be very concerned about the creation of a fast lane for censorship that can be activated at times that are politically convenient for the government. It's right that illegal content is taken offline but that responsibility has to be paired with strong protections /1

It’s obviously a long way from the most important point, but I think someone who thinks the correct response to witnessing an attempted beheading is to film it and post it on social media also comes from an alien culture

Because the English riots never got this violent. Nobody was burning shit down etc. Worst the English could manage to do was throw a single bin.

It doesn’t make sense to destroy their own community.

Everything on the internet will require an ID check soon. And the government will monitor everything you do, pretending they don't need a warrant because you "voluntarily" gave your data and identity information away.

Starmer Calls for Spyware on All Phones reclaimthenet.org/starmer-ca…

“Prevent nude images” at device level implies checking private photos/messages If it’s built into phones, it’s not just for kids, it’s for everyone Parents already have easy controls anyway Warnings about this were clear

He does. He just refused to acknowledge it because he's pushing a blatant agenda. x.com/i/status/2064278306195…

Remember that the first four big U.S. based targets of the UK Online Safety Act were not “child safety” targets but rather plaintext discussion forums that hosted wrongthink. Every interaction I have with the UK’s censorship apparatus, forever, will be colored by this fact.

Australia's Social Media Ban didn't work, over 70k people's ID were stolen from a Discord data breach, Yoti was fined 950k Euros by Spain for breaking GDPR laws. I do NOT trust anyone who pushes age/ID verification to use social media or ANY service, it's more harm than good.

Will you present identification if it’s required to use this platform? Voting is anonymous so please be totally honest! I’ll start: never! Not in a million years.

Countries are doing this in lockstep. It's coordinated and it's not about keeping kids safe at all. Western countries just want a Chinese style controlled and de-anonymized internet and this is the path they're taking to that.