كلمةٌ أخيرةٌ إلى دُعاةِ العصبيّةِ والعِرْقِ والقَبيلة يا مَن يَحمِلُ رايةَ الجاهليّةِ في زمنِ الإسلام، يا مَن يَزِنُ الرجالَ بالأنسابِ والقبائلِ والألوانِ والألسنة، اسمَعْ قولَ مَن أُرسِلَ رحمةً للعالمين، محمدٍ ﷺ. قال ﷺ فيمَن يَفخَرُ بدعوى الجاهليّة: «مَنْ تَعَزَّى بِعَزَاءِ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ فَأَعِضُّوهُ بِهَنِ أَبِيهِ وَلَا تَكْنُوا» وقال ﷺ في حَجّةِ الوداعِ على مسمعِ الأممِ المُجتمعة: «يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ، أَلَا إِنَّ رَبَّكُمْ وَاحِدٌ، وَإِنَّ أَبَاكُمْ وَاحِدٌ، أَلَا لَا فَضْلَ لِعَرَبِيٍّ عَلَى أَعْجَمِيٍّ، وَلَا لِعَجَمِيٍّ عَلَى عَرَبِيٍّ، وَلَا لِأَحْمَرَ عَلَى أَسْوَدَ، وَلَا أَسْوَدَ عَلَى أَحْمَرَ، إِلَّا بِالتَّقْوَى» وقال لأبي ذرٍّ رضي الله عنه حين بَدَرَتْ منه نَخوةُ النَّسَب: «انْظُرْ فَإِنَّكَ لَيْسَ بِخَيْرٍ مِنْ أَحْمَرَ وَلَا أَسْوَدَ إِلَّا أَنْ تَفْضُلَهُ بِتَقْوَى» وقَضى القرآنُ بما لا يَنقُضُه ناقِض (الحجرات: ١٣): «يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُم مِّن ذَكَرٍ وَأُنثَىٰ وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوبًا وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا ۚ إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ» فانظُرْ أين وَجَّهَ النبيُّ ﷺ أشدَّ كلامِه وأصرَحَه: ما وَجَّهَه إلى العاصي المُقبِلِ على التوبة، بل إلى المُنتفِخِ بأنسابِه، المُتطاوِلِ بقبيلتِه. فأغلَظُ زَجْرٍ في السُّنّةِ إنّما ادُّخِرَ لفَخْرِ العِرْقِ والقَبيلة. وهذا هو الداءُ الذي يَنخُرُ في جسدِ الأمّةِ اليوم. العصبيّةُ والعنصريّةُ والقوميّةُ تُمزِّقُ صفَّ المؤمنين، وتُطمِعُ فينا أعداءَنا، وتُحارِبُ الأساسَ الذي جَمَعَنا عليه الإسلام: التوحيدَ والتقوى. فما العِزُّ موروثًا في الدماء، وإنّما يُنالُ بتقوى اللهِ وحدَه. فارجِعْ إلى السُّنّة، وإلّا فاعلَمْ أنّ زَجْرَ النبيِّ ﷺ قائمٌ عليكَ لا تَملِكُ له رَدًّا. واللهُ أعلم.

When Wahhabis have their beliefs criticized by Muslims outside the Gulf - these Muslims are told that Gulf Arabs own Islam and that no one else is capable of genuinely understanding it or caring about it. The Persian who criticizes Wahhabism is labelled a secret Rafidi kafir, and a son of Mut'a. The Egyptian who criticizes Wahhabism is labelled a Copt, and an African n--ger slave. When thousands of Wahhabis constantly post comments of this type, how can it then be claimed that contemporary Wahhabism has nothing to do with Gulf nationalism or racism?

A supremacist undercurrent just unmasked itself. I baited the Arab nationalist Najdists in their own tongue, and they did not disappoint. Out poured the contempt: Arab blood exalted, non-Arab believers from Africa to Asia to the West cast as second-class, their cultures branded corruptions of the faith. Not every Khaleeji. Many recoil at this. But a racism festers in those lands, and it is that same racism that lets them shrug at Palestinian and Yemeni blood, the poorest of Arabs and the noblest. This was never fringe. It is the creed’s logical end. Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was refuted in his own lifetime, even by his own brother Sulayman, who rebuked him for his recklessness in takfir, and by towering scholars after him such as al-Shawkani and Ibn Abidin. He survives today not on scholarship but on political utility and tribal pride: a tool to Arabize Islam, hoard power, and sideline the global Ummah. And mark the hypocrisy of his defenders. Many of the loudest among them are regulars at the brothels of London, men who shed every mask of piety the moment they land for holiday and sink into the most hedonistic Western excess, disgracing the image of Arabs across the West. The mask did not slip. It shattered, before the English-speaking world and the whole Ummah. Point proven, beyond reasonable doubt. History will not forget.

كثير من العرب العنصريين ينعتونني بـ"النيغر" و"العبد" فقط لأنني مصري وأحمل حوالي 20 بالمائة من الدنا الإفريقي جنوب الصحراء. أسألكم بكل صدق ومباشرة: هل تعتقدون حقاً أنكم أحرار أكثر من شعوب إفريقيا جنوب الصحراء؟ قد يكونون أفقر مادياً، لكن من الذي يواجه قيوداً أكبر عندما يريد أن يعبر عن رأيه بحرية في السياسة أو الدين، أنتم أم هم؟ كم قاعدة عسكرية أمريكية توجد في بلدانهم مقارنة ببلدانكم؟ من الذي يحتاج أكثر إلى حماية "الرجل الأبيض" واستجداء رضاه، أنتم أم هم؟ الشعوب السوداء، خاصة في إفريقيا، من أكثر الناس تواضعاً على وجه الأرض. وقد حذرنا النبي ﷺ من أن يكون في القلب مثقال ذرة من الكبر. قد تظنون أن ما أنعم الله به عليكم من موارد طبيعية يجعلكم أفضل من غيركم، لكن هذا وهم. إنما التفاضل بالتقوى فقط. أنا أفضل أن أكون 100 بالمائة أسوداً وخالياً من هذا الكبر، على أن أشبه العنصريين منكم بأي شك

In Islam, God can save humans by simply forgiving their sins, without first slaughtering his innocent son (who is also somehow himself) as a human sacrifice at a Jewish temple.

Our audience is not leftists, it's Muslims.

Yea.... you learn alot.

In a recent post seemingly directed at Mohammed HIjab and me, "S-tier" Wahhabi polemicist Bassam Zawadi writes the following: "A polemical argument raised against Salafis that is gaining traction is the claim that they apply double standards in matters of kufr and theological deviation. Critics argue that Salafis are often willing to describe certain beliefs held by groups such as the Ash‘aris, grave-venerating Sufis, and others as kufr or shirk, yet supposedly become hesitant when controversial positions are attributed to figures they deeply revere, such as Ibn Taymiyyah. The issue is commonly framed around the question of fana’ al-nar, the alleged belief that Hellfire’s punishment will eventually cease. Critics argue that denying the everlastingness of Hell’s punishment is a kufri position, and therefore Salafis should at least concede that Ibn Taymiyyah “fell into kufr” if he truly held such a view. .... "Even assuming Ibn Taymiyyah inclined toward that position, he did not arrive at it by rejecting revelation, dismissing consensus arrogantly, or attempting to undermine the religion’s foundations. Rather, he genuinely believed that some reports and narrations from the Salaf indicated such a position, alongside certain Qur’anic texts containing language of exception and divine will. "In other words, his methodology itself remained rooted in appeal to revelation, transmitted reports, and perceived athar from the Salaf. The alleged error, according to this framing, would therefore lie in the application and conclusion, not in the underlying usul or methodology itself. "This distinction matters enormously. There is a major difference between someone whose methodology systematically subordinates revelation to philosophical premises or compromises tawhid al-ibadah itself, and someone who reaches an erroneous conclusion while sincerely attempting to follow revelation and the understanding of the Salaf." -end quote Bassam's arguments are ad hoc, illogical, and misleading. First of all, he claims that Ibn Taymiyya's affirmation that the hellfire will end is somehow acceptable because it derives from sound methodology which bases theological claims on scripture and the statements of the Salaf. Many of those who deny that istighatha is known with certainty to be shirk and kufr (like myself) also base their views on scripture and statements of the Salaf. The Quran, hadith, and statements of the Salaf provide some support for the view that one may call out to jinns, angels, and even the dead for certain limited forms of aid. Such a view is NOT BASED ON PHILOSOPHICAL PRINCIPLES. It is also the dominant view of Atharis/Hanbalis throughout history. Nevertheless, Wahhabis claim that this view is outright kufr and shirk, or amounts to a defense of kufr and shirk. Bassam himself has specifically attacked me on these grounds, and sought to cancel me, despite the fact that I have continuously affirmed the Athari creed and rejected basing theology on abstract philosophical principles. So he cannot claim that Wahhabis have a consistent policy of excusing those who reject such principles. Rather they viciously attack anyone whose views differ from their own, even when these views are justified purely on the basis of scripture and statements of the Salaf. This is not surprising. Ibn Abd al-Wahhab takfired and attacked the Hanbali scholars of his day for rejecting the view that istighatha is known with certainty to be shirk and kufr. He attacked them despite their Athari methodology. Bassam follows in Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's footsteps. Bassam also says  "A speculative interpretive error in a transmitted eschatological matter [i.e., denying that hellfire is eternal] is not viewed [by Sunni scholars] in the same way as doctrines that directly compromise tawhid al-ibadah." This claim is idiotic for two reasons. First of all, it implies that denying the eternality hellfire is a minor secondary matter whereas in reality it directly relates to one of the six pillars of iman. Second, what is Bassam's evidence that Sunni scholars view denying the hellfire as different from compromising tawhid al-ibada? Here what Bassam is actually arguing is that Sunni scholars think that denying the hellfire is less of a problem than belief in the validity of tawassul and istighatha. Which Sunni scholars is Bassam talking about? Does he simply mean Ibn Taymiyya himself and Ibn Abd al-Wahhab? Or does he mean other scholars? If so, who are these other scholars? In reality, Bassam does not (and cannot) quote any other Sunni scholars with the view that denying the hellfire is less of a problem than belief in the validity of tawassul and istighatha. Actually, they have the opposite view. Premodern Sunni scholars usually do not takfir those who believe in tawassul and istighatha but do takfir those who deny the hellfire (or deny its eternity). This is obvious to anyone who possesses the most basic familiarity with the Sunni tradition. But Bassam's wahhabitard followers apparently lack this knowledge, and so are easily deceived by his baseless arguments. Perhaps someone more sympathetic to Bassam might respond: "It is fine if you disagree with Bassam's view, but there is no need to express this disagreement with such a harsh tone." But such an opinion misses the point. Bassam himself coordinates attacks on me, directly participates in smear campaigns which label me a deviant shirk apologist or kafir, and then wants to claim that others are being "unfair" to Wahhabis by criticizing them for their harshness and double standards in matters of takfir and tabdi. If Bassam wishes to engage in this type of behavior, then so be it. But it is hypocritical for him to claim that Wahhabis do not engage in such behavior, and that Wahhabis are being criticized unfairly as a result. S-tier btw

Salafi/religious burn out is real Even the prophet warned against it Practice Islam with balance and easy not hardship

Didn't Sneako risk getting banned by promoting you on his channels when you were relatively unknown, and since then you go around calling him an idiot and mocking him behind his back? What kind of person does that?

Looking forward to discussing Iran tomorrow inshaAllah with brother Uthman bin Farooq. Should be a good exchange! @ONEMESSAGEFDN

To Anti-Islam Channels: Use my content without permission and expect a copyright strike no exceptions. To Pro-Islam Creators: This is a public permission for anyone who is pro-Islam, Muslim, and not engaging in disparagement: you may create clips of up to 60 seconds from my content, on any platform (X/Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc.) and in any language. You hereby have my permission.

> we’re not doing it > if you say we’re doing it you’re antisemitic > we are doing it and that’s a good thing > if you don’t think it’s a good thing you’re antisemitic

Gazalogy is better than your Holocaustianity slop that you've imposed on the West like a mandatory religion.

I destroyed this NYpost journalist so hard they had to scrap the entire podcast and write an article calling me an antisemite. Nobody is falling for this cancel culture anymore. We are at war, that era is over.

Sneako is right. Talking trash publicly but apologizing privately is a fag move.

If Salahuddin Ayyubi were alive to liberate Al-Quds, he would first start with countries like the UAE.

I think Salahuddin would first destroy Wahhabis like you and your UAE masters. Thankfully, most of that job is being done right now with Iran controlling Hormuz and collapsing the petro dollar. Your deviant movement is being flushed down the toilet as we speak alhamdulillah.