Joined January 2013
- Tweets 67,727
- Following 5,423
- Followers 5,447
- Likes 55,970
16,458 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
4 Nov 2024
I fully expect DMs, EMs, etc to blow up in the next 48 hrs
If I don't respond, don't worry. I know who has supported my work and I won't lose sight of that
If you'd like to join me in developing a set of unified scientific standards for this field, my book is available in bio
11
1
69
46,929
I like how far right scientific illiterates ask "what is a woman?" As their favorite debate question.
The fact that they don't think a person who has birthed multiple children is a woman illustrates their confusion over sex is projection.
1
188
Jun 7
Donald Trump lies like he breathes.
Constantly, but not very well.
1
2
160
May 30
"Top 1% pay 40% of taxes!"
You've heard it regurgitated, but I bet you've never analyzed it.
Turns out, it's a lie.
Top 1% of income earners pay 40% of income taxes.
Bet you don't even know the difference.
Because you're easily misled.
2
204
May 29
MAGA: unlike the rest of you snowflakes we believe in Merit
Also MAGA: hahahahaha vegan!
2
158
May 29
Hey @MLBPA
Hearing talk of a cap/floor as part of negotiations
Fair warning:
Without a VERY dramatic restructuring of "rookie" contract structure where a team "owns" the player for 3 years at league min salary, it will be abused and be terrible for players - esp. pitchers
1
175
May 20
Real people really believe that this guy offered meaningful arguments and insights
1
1
2
271
May 18
Good choice
11 Nov 2025
You may speak when you acknowledge who has the burden of proof
Until then, you have disqualified yourself from a rational discussion
Source cited
1
2
305
May 16
Why "40% of the (statewide) vote should yield 40% of the state's Representatives" has nothing to do with "fairness" nor anything to do with #gerrymandering.
In two sentences, I explain a concept that the @washingtonpost article and graphics actively misinformed readers about.
5
315
May 14
This is one of many reasons why people who work in this field should be ashamed.
They teach that you can compare the poll spread to the election spread and that the difference is poll error.
And that's not right.
"Outside the margin of error"
@AAPOR
275
May 12
Guess in comments
Assume this map is divided into 5 contiguous districts of 5 units each without any consideration (or knowledge) of partisanship
Contiguous meaning they touch at a side - not diagonal
Of all possible maps, in what % does blue win exactly 3?
#gerrymandering
401
May 7
Reminder that so-called conservatives have been on the wrong side of every social and civil rights movement in history.
You can't prove me wrong
1
6
254
May 7
Democrats in 2021: "the President does not control the weather"
Republicans after the Republican President drops a nuke causing a nuclear winter
"Democrats used to say the President doesn't control the weather what changed?"
1
216
Apr 25
This has been the most unbelievable day I've had betting, and it's not close.
Not pictured: a bunch
1
1
480
Apr 25
All available pregame, all free.
If I didn't post publicly, no one would believe it. I only post to prove I can.
I'll be switching to subscription soon lmao
hrtd.substack.com/
2
258
Apr 24
People like @AndrewCFollett proudly admit they have no idea what gerrymandering is without realizing it, also proving they're bad at math
Watch this
In a state w 5 Reps and a totally non-gerrymandered map:
How many Reps would a party with 60% statewide be expected to receive?
4
558
Apr 23
Hey here's a fun fact. Massachusetts voted 36% Republican, and has nine representatives.
And there is literally no way to draw maps in Massachusetts that would guarantee Republicans even ONE district.
I dare anyone to try and prove me wrong. Then tell me what happens.
3
463