Thanks to Matt Brown (from Extra Points) & others for pointing out the revenue disparities between EADA and MFRS reports. In general, the MFRS data is more detailed and trustworthy, but is not available for private schools. He provided a screenshot from his database and I fed that data and subsidies data (which includes student fees, government &/or institutional support, etc...) into ChatGTP to create the following graphic.
New EADA Grand Total Revenue for FY 2025 for Big12 schools (FY 2024 figures) :
Kansas $173.7 ($215)
Colorado $ 161.7 ($147)
TCU $ 156.0 ($142)
Ok St. $ 153.7 ($132)
BYU $ 153.4 ($130)**
ASU $ 149.3 ($127)
Baylor $ 144.1 ($148)
Arizona $ 132.7 ($139)
Texas Tech $ 128.8 ($115)
Utah $ 125.2 ($112)
Cincy $ 119.3 ($90)**
WVU $ 117.4 ($106)
UCF $ 108.9 ($93)**
Iowa St. $ 103.9 ($101)
K-St. $ 103.0 ($106)
Houston $ 100.1 ($99)**
**Half-share Big12 payouts
Full-share payouts for BYU, Cincy, UCF & Houston will be reflected on next year's reports
BYU on-pace to be at the top of Big12 Revenue by next year's reports (meaning when they start receiving the full-share payouts this summer)
Cincy & UCF also on strong upward trajectories not Houston yet
Only 2 schools to report less revenue this year than last were Kansas and K-State
After 2 years above $200M (Booth/Stadium donations?), Kansas has "come back down to earth" at $173M
Texas Tech not looking fiscally dominant on these reports, but would expect to see big jumps on the next report(s)
^^^^ALL schools (public & PRIVATE) are required to self-report these EADA (US Dept of Education) figures each year. Other revenue figures obtained from public school's financial and tax documents (FOIA requests) may vary from these numbers for some schools. However, this EADA database is worthwhile to report since it is standardized and includes all private schools as well.