Ethical soldiers are more resilient than non-ethical ones.
If your leaders are making unethical decisions during simulations then yes, that should be tested and corrected. Because train as you fight.
Fighting ethically doesn’t mean you don’t throw a punch when it’s needed.
Ethics ethics ethics what is this fucking obsession with ethics?
I was talking to some officers about testing leadership in simulations recently.
The first question I got from some major after talking about LARGE SCALE COMBAT was “the first thing we should look to test is ethical decision making”.
I was beside myself.
This overly feminized society that has become brittle from political correctness is obsessed with ethics and virtue signaling.
To the point where they don’t even realize that the main thing the military needs to do is throw a punch.
Like we’re talking about testing because we question the ability of many officers to be able to throw that punch. And yet still we get met with ethics ethics ethics.
Are we unethical or something? Are there mass US war crimes I’m unaware of that actually fit the definition and not just how some soy latte drinker feels?
You want to talk about “ethics”? Start with fucking readiness and the metrics you lie about every single day in an effort to not rock the boat and keep your jobs.
Spare me.
War on the rocks is a filthy rag anyway. I’m just here to point it out.