AVS evaluation continues with one critical question: 👉 What kind of slashing mechanism is implemented? The structure of a slashing mechanism defines how reliably and fairly slashing is enforced. Some are fully automatic, while others rely on human judgment. Restaking.risk classifies AVSs into three types based on their slashing logic: ⚙️ Deterministic 👋 Challenge-Period 👥 Committee-Based 🚨 Surprisingly, as of now, there are no AVSs with fully disclosed and verifiable slashing mechanisms that we can evaluate. Your AVS type will directly influence its risk rating — and yes, it can be updated anytime. Got questions? Missing data? Submit a PR. Let’s make it accurate, together. 👇 1/

AVS evaluation starts with one simple question: 👉 Do slashing and reward policies exist? 🤔 Checking for slashing and reward policies is the starting point of AVS evaluation.If slashing exists, it should be transparent. If not, that absence is the risk. Restaking.risk assigns a risk signal based on policy visibility. 🔴 Got a red light? Don’t panic — we’re just waiting for your PR. restaking.dotrisk.xyz/eigenl… 👇 1/

🔍 Why Risk Analysis Matters for Restaking-Secured Services (ex. AVS…)? Restaking extends Ethereum’s security assets to external services — a powerful model for shared security. But with this new model comes new and hidden risks. 👇1/

AVSs built on EigenLayer adopt varied slashing mechanisms: ✅ Most are not standardized ❌ Many are not transparently disclosed Slashing design impacts AVS reliability, transparency, and staker protection. But today, there is no consistent framework for comparing these risks objectively.🤔 2/

What is Restaking.risk? restaking.dotrisk.xyz/ Restaking has ushered in a new era of shared security. But with innovation comes hidden complexity and risk. We asked ourselves a simple question: “How secure are AVSs, really?" 👀 Here’s what we’re building to answer that 👇 1/

💡 Who is it for? 🔹Stakers → to identify and mitigate risks. 🔹Protocol Developers → to assess and improve design. 🔹Infra Providers & Researchers → for structured AVS comparisons. 3/