BTC key posts summary since Jul 2025. I cannot clarify individually so putting all together. - never talked about a new high since Jul 2025. - highlighted weakness since Jul 2025. - not said cycle is over because it didn't break the monthly support. Jul 2025 at $116k: 👉"Sudden sign of weakness in BTC weekly! .... I'm on high alert!" x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… Oct 2025 at $106k 👉"Currently, BTC’s trend is showing weakness. It will need to break above $116K to escape the downside pressure otherwise a risk of trend reversal." x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… Nov 2025 at $102k: 👉"A negative divergence is observed on the oscillator, signaling weakness in the trend" x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… Dec 2025 at $87k: 👉 "it’s weak but not dead. It’s still in an uptrend." x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… 1st Feb 2026 at $76k 👉"For the BTC uptrend, I’m tracking the April 2025 low ($74k) as the last support. A weekly close will tell us whether this is a breakdown or a bounce. I'm with the happy path simply because the last support is not broken yet." x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… 👉 5th Feb 2026 at $63k with support at $60k "The current retracement is the deepest so far. The last hope for the bulls is the $60k–$62k support range." x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… 👉4th Jun 2026 near $60k - retest of Feb low x.com/RhythmicAnalyst/status… #BTC $BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto

US Treasury 10y yields: I’ll keep tracking this because it gives a solid read on where interest rates are headed. Rates drive the lending business, and crypto is extremely sensitive to them — that’s why this matters. The moving average (especially the green one) has very little lag. The green line is sitting near 5%, and with yields currently below it, there’s no red flag yet. A break below the purple line would signal weakening yields — exactly what the crypto market is looking forward to. #Crypto #Treasury #Yields

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

BTC got a nice-looking weekly green candle. Oscillator is showing positive divergence (refer yellow path on a price chart and oscillator - the price is flat and oscillator started moving up). Pullback was the deepest — rested at the Feb low. However, there was no lower close. 👍 The ongoing bounce has to break above $88k to regain strength. So far, so good. #BTC $BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin

SpaceX stock is expensive. SpaceX YoY (2025 vs 2024): 👉Revenue: $18.7B ( 33% YoY from ~$14B) 👉Net earnings: -$4.9B (vs $791M profit in 2024) {making loss} 👉 Current market cap (June 12, 2026 post-IPO): ~$2.2T (trading ~$165-170/share after $135 IPO).

A true market mover!

I wont be surprised if the Fed does the same. Who knows, that could be the trigger for booming stock market! 👀

More wars higher inflations… Tariff policies have backfired already. The market is up only because of AI boom. Politicians are taking huge risk by ignoring domestic economic implications.

Silver indicated weakness below $68 USD. However, its last weekly trend support S4 on this indicator is at $54 USD. #Silver #Commodities

Gold is approaching the S4 weekly support level at $3,971. The weekly trend indicates weakness below $4,400. This month will tell us more about its reaction near the support. #Gold #Commodities

DRV: Good volume, near breakout. #DRV $DRV #Crypto

Has Crypto market reacted to this update in last one hour?

ZEC has seen a sharp move lower due a critical bug found this week, and it’s natural to feel frustration or disappointment after such volatility. Stepping back, however, technical analysis on the weekly timeframe offers helpful clarity. On this chart: • The green circle marks the breakout that launched the uptrend last year. • The white circles highlight successive lows and key support levels along the blue and yellow lines (including the current weekly low). As long as price holds above the $188 level on the weekly chart, the broader uptrend structure remains intact. What’s your view on ZEC right now? #ZEC $ZEC #ZCash #Crypto

ZEC - refer yellow circles.

If claude could do this for ZCASH then it’s logical to think about vulnerability in other platforms. Probably, that explains why so many Altcoins went down and BTC held up with a higher BTC dominance.