Decoding hair loss papers into actionable data. 🧬 📉 Self-Experimenting: Minox 1.5mm Needling. 🧪 Goal: Regrowth via Science, not Hype. Not medical advice.

Joined January 2026
57 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Many hair growth supplements pass right through your system unabsorbed. Your body absorbs nutrients from real food 10x better than from a pill. Here are my Top 5 vitamins and minerals for hair density, where to find them, and the when you should supplement. Enjoy the read 👇
5
23
192
11,226
The biggest event in hair science just wrapped. The 14th World Congress for Hair Research (Seoul, May 28-31) drew a record 1,700 researchers from across the globe. Theme: “Awakening the Soul of Hair Science.” Here’s a roundup of what actually mattered 👇
1
1
208
On the natural side: A Korean team (Aekyung) unveiled L-THP, a compound from corydalis, as a hair-loss-relief candidate. Historically studied for anti-inflammatory effects, now explored for follicles. Early-stage and industry-led, so file under “watch,” not “proven.”
1
87
Bottom line: No cure was announced, nothing changes your routine tomorrow. But the through-line was clear: the field is shifting from slowing hair loss to regenerating follicles, with Korea driving it. Pipeline’s the healthiest in 30 years. Follow @RootScientist for more.
1
1
91
5 food-based hair growth remedies you’ve seen on X. None of them regrow a single follicle, and the biology for why each one fails is genuinely simple. Quick rundown 👇
1
3
374
Myth #5: Green or black tea rinses block DHT and regrow hair. Mechanism is real. EGCG (in tea) inhibits 5α-reductase in lab dishes. The problem is delivery. A 2-3 minute rinse can’t get enough EGCG through the scalp to reach follicles meaningfully. Lab petri dish ≠ human scalp.
1
138
The pattern across all 5: hair grows at the follicle, 3-4mm below the skin. To reach it you need molecules that penetrate (minoxidil) or controlled injury (microneedling). Eggs, rice water, and ACV do neither. Follow @RootScientist for more science.
140
A new device class for hair loss just got fresh clinical data at ASLMS this week. It’s not LLLT. It’s not microneedling. It’s NAFL: non-ablative fractional laser. Here’s what it is, what the science says, and whether it’s worth the money 👇
1
1
4
368
Practical reality: 4-6 monthly clinic sessions to start, then 2-3 maintenance sessions yearly. Not a DIY treatment. Side effects include redness, temporary shedding, and possible pigmentation change. Best framed as an adjunct, not a replacement for finasteride or minoxidil.
1
168
Bottom line: NAFL is legit. New device class, FDA-cleared, real mechanism. ASLMS data is promising but thin on detail. Treat as emerging adjunct, not breakthrough. Fundamentals (finasteride, minoxidil) still do the heavy lifting. Follow @RootScientist for more science.
140