> Men are choosing not to work for a society that hates them > Women most affected You can't make this up.

1) Americans no longer have anything in common with each other thanks to mass migration 2) the internet and social media are addicting people and cause mass mental illness, especially among women 3) cost of living is out of control in desirable places to live 4) young kids can’t find employment yet have massive debt 5) minorities in cities are out of control and authorities won’t do anything about it 6) boomers can’t stop watching cable tv and spending their retirement bitching about made up problems (trump, no kings) 7) women are often more educated than men and now taking leadership roles in major companies and institutions. Their displacement of men in these situations makes far more women unwilling to date men beneath station and left competing for a dwindling pool of men. 8) society stigmatizes women staying at home and raising kids while making the cost of doing this next to impossible for most families 9) liberalism among educated women and its add on feminism make women miserable and men unwilling to date them 10) high housing prices (government regulation) 11) high healthcare prices (socialization of healthcare and mass migration) 12) high education prices (government subsidizing universities hiring practices and ongoing sinecures) I could go on and on. Most of it stems from easily avoidable problems

The average American with colonial ancestors going 300 years back is more British and has a more legitimate claim to British citizenship than the average londonite lol

The absolute darkest truth about how society views men is that we do not actually value male life; we only value what a man is willing to destroy himself to provide. Think about the male archetypes we actually celebrate. The soldier who doesn't come home. The father who works three grueling jobs until his heart gives out. The athlete who permanently destroys his brain and body for our entertainment. We only applaud masculinity when it is actively bleeding for the benefit of someone else. The exact moment a man decides he wants to step off the treadmill—to prioritize his own peace, his mental health, or his physical safety over his utility to the world—he is instantly branded as lazy, weak, or unambitious. We don’t want men to be whole, healthy, or at peace. We want them to be highly functioning shock absorbers. We demand they build the houses, fight the wars, and fund the lifestyles, and our only reward for this lifelong, crushing expectation is a quiet funeral when the stress finally kills them

GM everybody but HR generalists

MUST WATCH!

List of what Israel has given to America since 1948, the Nakba. Must watch and share.

This is also why leftists have such high rates of mental illness Imagine having no social circle outside of people who would abandon you if you ever disagree with them. Leftists are all suicidal because of the ideology they adhere to

🗣️"Stop coming to Ireland" An Indian student in Ireland complains about difficulties in gaining employment and obtaining sponsorship. She complains of sponsorship being awarded on meritocracy and not sympathy, I kid you not. I'm not sure what is worse, the overwhelming sense of entitlement or awful racism towards Irish. Wait for the end where the poster likes and posts laugh emoji at a certain comment.

Christianity didn't defeat "new atheism". It failed to win the war. It failed to win a single battle. "New atheism" was defeated by the most powerful force in politics, which has dominated human history since before we learned to bang the rocks together, and which will dominate human history while we explore the Lesser Magellanic Cloud. New atheism was defeated by horny. The sex drive of the young human male is the supreme force of civilization. It invented the technologies, it fought every war, it founded every nation, it built every empire. It drove new atheism to great heights, up until the moment new atheism declared war on it. Then it smashed the new atheism without mercy. Young men declared allegiance to atheism because they chafed at the restrictions of religious law which made it harder for them to get sex. And they would continue that allegiance so long as they believed that a world with Christianity overthrown would be a world where they could get laid. Rebecca Watson singlehandedly triggered the cascade that ended all that. When she summoned an internet lynch mob to punish a generic standard young male atheist for daring to make a pass at her in an elevator, this was an attack on two fronts. First of all, it aligned atheism, publicly, with the idea that a man pursuing sex is committing an offense, that even a verbal advance is, or at least often can be, a predatory, "problematic" act. Secondly, everyone knew that Generic Standard Young Male Atheist would not have been subjected to this treatment had she found him attractive. The first prong of this attack informed all the Generic Standard Young Male Atheists that their efforts to get laid would be scrutinized, not just for gross offenses against a woman's personal autonomy, but for anything and everything that accidentally gave her the ick. If he failed to read her accurately, the fault would be entirely his, and the punishment unlimited. The second prong of the attack created the widespread stereotype of the Generic Standard Young Male Atheist as an unattractive, stinky, socially awkward neckbeard. Now, the Christians had been trying to do this for some time, but without any real success. Young men did not care if boomer preachers with suspiciously expensive homes, or married church Karens, called them neckbeards. They were not trying to be attractive to either of these groups. They were trying to be attractive to young atheist women. The moment the young atheist women began to publicly feed the stereotype, it might as well have been carved on the cornerstone of the universe in flaming letters eleven light years tall. Now, most Generic Standard Young Male Atheists were not stinky neckbeards. They were just ordinary tribeless young men who didn't quite fit in. So long as they had the dream that a world dominated by secular atheist liberty of conscience would provide them with girls who were sometimes willing to have sex with them, they would support the movement. But now, in one stroke, Rebecca Watson revealed that atheist women did not desire them, and were perfectly willing to throw them under the bus for social status or google ad clickthroughs. Suddenly, saying "I am an atheist" at parties went from meaning "I am an independent sort of person who's not very religious" to meaning "I am socially awkward, unattractive, and cannot even groom myself properly". It didn't matter if all of these things were visibly untrue. Women are very susceptible to group suggestion in what they find attractive. So all the young men left the movement. They didn't suddenly start believing in god, or want to join a church, but they stopped pulling the chariot, drifted away, and began describing themselves as "not really religious" at those same parties. Which meant the same thing in terms of their personal beliefs, but meant something very different about who they would show up and fight for. You cannot go to war with horny. You can go to war with degenerate. You can go to war with promiscuous. You can go to war with perverted. You can even go to war with hedonistic. But you cannot go to war with horny. You will lose. Your movement, whatever it is, will fail if you do not offer young men a clear, understandable, viable path to women they actually want. The details don't matter. You can offer them inexpensive prostitutes, a hedonistic society full of sluts, or one adoring virgin bride. But you have to offer them something other than shame, celibacy, and the longhouse. Or they will spurn you as you would spurn a rabid dog. This post is not about the atheist movement.

In big 26 I feel simply darwinistic about life. I genuinely feel like an animal