- Tweets 1,167
- Following 213
- Followers 1,210
- Likes 115
ALT “Identifying Information” shall be construed broadly to include any record or information that reveals a name, date of birth, social security number, personal identifying information, personal or business contact information, or professional qualifications. The term “identifying information” also includes any residential or business address; any residential, personal, or business telephone number; any residential, personal or business facsimile number; any residential, personal, or business email address; and any residential, personal, or business social media account or username.
ALT A person shall not knowingly disclose the identifying information of a current or former member of an execution team or disclose a record that would identify a person as being a current or former member of an execution team. Any person and his immediate family, or entity whose identity is disclosed in violation of this section shall have a civil cause of action against the person who is in violation of this section and may recover actual damages and, upon a showing of willful violation of this section, punitive damages. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection also must be imprisoned not more than three years.
ALT page one of the order
ALT page two of the order
ALT one of the Murdaugh case dockets. An order that was filed on June 10 at 10:35 AM is highlighted red
ALT one of the Murdaugh case dockets. An order that was filed on June 10 at 10:35 AM is highlighted red
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-10-01
ALT Page 1 of the opinion Corley v. Palmetto Bluff Development
ALT Page 2 of the opinion Corley v. Palmetto Bluff Development
ALT Page 3 of the opinion Corley v. Palmetto Bluff Development
ALT Page 4 of the opinion Corley v. Palmetto Bluff Development
ALT Page 1 of the opinion Antoinet Moore v. Green's Grocery
ALT Page 2 of the opinion Antoinet Moore v. Green's Grocery
ALT Page 3 of the opinion Antoinet Moore v. Green's Grocery
ALT Page 4 of the opinion Antoinet Moore v. Green's Grocery
ALT press release from SC Supreme Court regarding McCaslin's appointment
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT Page 2 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT Judge Debra R. McCaslin was born in Tampa, Florida, but is a life-long resident of Chapin, South Carolina. She is married to Michael W. McCaslin, a retired engineer with the South Carolina Department of Transportation, and together they have two children. After graduating from Chapin High School, Judge McCaslin was employed by Senator Strom Thurmond before attending the College of Charleston and graduating in 1990 with a degree in Political Science. Judge McCaslin earned her Juris Doctorate from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1993, and was subsequently admitted to the South Carolina Bar the same year. She was also admitted to the U. S. District Court in November 1993; the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in November 1993; and the United States Supreme Court in April 1999. Following law school, Judge McCaslin worked as a law clerk for J. Preston Strom, Jr., Attorney-at-law. In 1993, Judge McCaslin began working at the Leventis Law Firm as an Associate, before ult
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT Page 2 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT Page 2 of the order 2026-06-08-01
ALT A table of filings filed in SC Supreme Court cases on June 5, 2026
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-05-01
ALT In State v. Blackwell, appellant filed the motion seeking to unseal records after the opinion and remittitur had been issued. See Appellate Case No. 2014-000610. The request in that case,though, involved a witness's still privileged medical records and the request was denied. In contrast here, the Juror had previously moved to intervene and modify the consent order protections to have the transcripts deemed open. Moreover, Appellant did not object but took no position on the Juror’s previous request, and the State's objection to modification was conditionally given based on the procedural posture of the appeal. Here, a new trial has been granted to Appellant. There should be no prejudice to any party at this time. Consequently, the scales should now tip to unsealing and removing restrictions
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-04-01
ALT Page 2 of the order 2026-06-04-01
ALT Page 3 of the order 2026-06-04-01
ALT Page 4 of the order 2026-06-04-01
ALT Page 1 of the order 2026-06-03-01
ALT Page 2 of the order 2026-06-03-01