A reminder as we wait for SCOTUS to deliver its opinion in United States v. Rahimi—a case that will determine whether governments can continue to prevent domestic abusers from possessing firearms—that women’s bodies are more regulated than guns in America.
Nearly 18 months ago, the 5th Circuit, which presides over federal lawsuits in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, vacated a 1996 law prohibiting anyone under a civil domestic violence restraining order from possessing a gun. As a result, those federal protections have not been enforced in those three states ever since—a death sentence for women and children.
This case never should have even made it to SCOTUS in the first place. Not only is the 5th Circuit ruling absurd, but the defendant—Rahimi—is a violent criminal. He once fired a shot at someone who saw him shove his girlfriend in a parking lot, and then threatened to shoot his girlfriend if she told anyone; he fired an AR-15 into the home of someone who posted about him online; he shot at a driver after a car accident; he shot at a truck that flashed its lights at him on the highway; and he shot his gun into the air after his friend’s credit card was declined at a Whataburger. THIS is who extremists want to arm. And yet:
* Nearly two-thirds of domestic homicides in the US are committed with a gun
* Over 70 women are shot and killed by an intimate partner each month
* Up to 20 percent of violent deaths of intimate partners also involve deaths of children or other family members
* Homicide is the leading cause of maternal death in the US, most of it with firearms
We can’t elect SCOTUS justices, but we can elect a President and Congress that will check its worst decisions. If you are watching these rulings—like unbanning bump stocks—in dismay and wondering what you can do, remember the best way to combat SCOTUS overreach is to vote in November for Democrats who will work to prevent gun violence and fight for democracy.